Liquidity and asset pricing: evidence from the Brazilian market

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Machado, Márcio André Veras
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Machado, Márcia Reis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/354
Resumo: The article examines whether the two-factor model developed by Liu (2006) explains the variations in stock returns in the Brazilian market. We also compare the performance of this model with the CAPM and the three-factor model of Fama & French (1993) and investigate whether the two-factor model is robust to strategies based on size, book-to-market, momentum, earnings/price, cash flow/price, liquidity and leverage, called value anomalies. We used multiple regressions with time series to analyze the performance of the models in explaining the variations in stock returns of various portfolios. The population analyzed consisted of all the firms with shares listed on the BM&FBovespa in the period from 1995 to 2008. The two-factor model performed better than the CAPM and very near the three-factor model in terms of explanatory power. Therefore, the results obtained with the two-factor model are relevant, considering we worked with dynamic portfolios. Finally, even though the two-factor model was not able to explain some of the anomalies commonly documented in the literature, advances were evidenced, which can be considered an important step in the literature, even though much can still be accomplished.
id FBS-1_481d59450f091aaa5f4540d12201e3b3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/354
network_acronym_str FBS-1
network_name_str BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Liquidity and asset pricing: evidence from the Brazilian marketLiquidez e precificação de ativos: evidências do mercado brasileiroLiquidityAsset pricing modelsCAPMThree-factor model of Fama & French (1993)LiquidezModelo de precificação de ativosCAPMTrês fatores de Fama e French (1993)The article examines whether the two-factor model developed by Liu (2006) explains the variations in stock returns in the Brazilian market. We also compare the performance of this model with the CAPM and the three-factor model of Fama & French (1993) and investigate whether the two-factor model is robust to strategies based on size, book-to-market, momentum, earnings/price, cash flow/price, liquidity and leverage, called value anomalies. We used multiple regressions with time series to analyze the performance of the models in explaining the variations in stock returns of various portfolios. The population analyzed consisted of all the firms with shares listed on the BM&FBovespa in the period from 1995 to 2008. The two-factor model performed better than the CAPM and very near the three-factor model in terms of explanatory power. Therefore, the results obtained with the two-factor model are relevant, considering we worked with dynamic portfolios. Finally, even though the two-factor model was not able to explain some of the anomalies commonly documented in the literature, advances were evidenced, which can be considered an important step in the literature, even though much can still be accomplished.Este artigo teve por objetivo analisar se o modelo de dois fatores desenvolvido por Liu (2006) explica as variações dos retornos das ações no mercado acionário Brasileiro. Teve-se como objetivo secundário comparar o desempenho do modelo de dois fatores de Liu com o do CAPM e com o de três fatores de Fama e French (1993), bem como investigar se o modelo é robusto às estratégias baseadas nos efeitos tamanho da empresa, book-to-market, estratégia momento, lucro/preço, fluxo de caixa/preço, liquidez e alavancagem, denominadas de anomalias de valor. Para o desenvolvimento do estudo, optou-se pelo emprego de portfólios e, para analisar o desempenho do modelo na explicação das variações dos retornos das ações, foram utilizadas regressões múltiplas em série de tempo. A população analisada consistiu de todas as empresas com ações listadas na BM&FBOVESPA, no período de 1995 a 2008. Como resultados principais, percebeu-se uma melhora no poder explicativo do modelo de dois fatores em relação ao CAPM e um desempenho muito próximo ao modelo de três fatores. Dessa forma, os resultados obtidos com o modelo de dois fatores são relevantes, considerando que se trabalhou com portfólios dinâmicos. Por fim, ainda que o modelo de dois fatores não tenha explicado as anomalias comumente documentadas na literatura, avanços foram evidenciados, sendo um importante passo na literatura, mesmo havendo muito a evoluir.FUCAPE Business Shool2014-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleArtigo revisado pelos paresapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/35410.15728/bbr.2014.11.1.4Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2014): January to February 2014; 69-89Brazilian Business Review; v. 11 n. 1 (2014): Janeiro a Fevereiro de 2014; 69-891808-23861807-734Xreponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)instname:Fucape Business School (FBS)instacron:FBSengporhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/354/537http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/354/538Machado, Márcio André VerasMachado, Márcia Reisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-11-06T19:51:15Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/354Revistahttps://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/indexONGhttp://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/oai|| bbronline@bbronline.com.br1808-23861808-2386opendoar:2018-11-06T19:51:15BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Liquidity and asset pricing: evidence from the Brazilian market
Liquidez e precificação de ativos: evidências do mercado brasileiro
title Liquidity and asset pricing: evidence from the Brazilian market
spellingShingle Liquidity and asset pricing: evidence from the Brazilian market
Machado, Márcio André Veras
Liquidity
Asset pricing models
CAPM
Three-factor model of Fama & French (1993)
Liquidez
Modelo de precificação de ativos
CAPM
Três fatores de Fama e French (1993)
title_short Liquidity and asset pricing: evidence from the Brazilian market
title_full Liquidity and asset pricing: evidence from the Brazilian market
title_fullStr Liquidity and asset pricing: evidence from the Brazilian market
title_full_unstemmed Liquidity and asset pricing: evidence from the Brazilian market
title_sort Liquidity and asset pricing: evidence from the Brazilian market
author Machado, Márcio André Veras
author_facet Machado, Márcio André Veras
Machado, Márcia Reis
author_role author
author2 Machado, Márcia Reis
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Machado, Márcio André Veras
Machado, Márcia Reis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Liquidity
Asset pricing models
CAPM
Three-factor model of Fama & French (1993)
Liquidez
Modelo de precificação de ativos
CAPM
Três fatores de Fama e French (1993)
topic Liquidity
Asset pricing models
CAPM
Three-factor model of Fama & French (1993)
Liquidez
Modelo de precificação de ativos
CAPM
Três fatores de Fama e French (1993)
description The article examines whether the two-factor model developed by Liu (2006) explains the variations in stock returns in the Brazilian market. We also compare the performance of this model with the CAPM and the three-factor model of Fama & French (1993) and investigate whether the two-factor model is robust to strategies based on size, book-to-market, momentum, earnings/price, cash flow/price, liquidity and leverage, called value anomalies. We used multiple regressions with time series to analyze the performance of the models in explaining the variations in stock returns of various portfolios. The population analyzed consisted of all the firms with shares listed on the BM&FBovespa in the period from 1995 to 2008. The two-factor model performed better than the CAPM and very near the three-factor model in terms of explanatory power. Therefore, the results obtained with the two-factor model are relevant, considering we worked with dynamic portfolios. Finally, even though the two-factor model was not able to explain some of the anomalies commonly documented in the literature, advances were evidenced, which can be considered an important step in the literature, even though much can still be accomplished.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
Artigo revisado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/354
10.15728/bbr.2014.11.1.4
url http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/354
identifier_str_mv 10.15728/bbr.2014.11.1.4
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/354/537
http://www.bbronline.com.br/index.php/bbr/article/view/354/538
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FUCAPE Business Shool
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FUCAPE Business Shool
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Business Review; Vol. 11 No. 1 (2014): January to February 2014; 69-89
Brazilian Business Review; v. 11 n. 1 (2014): Janeiro a Fevereiro de 2014; 69-89
1808-2386
1807-734X
reponame:BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
instname:Fucape Business School (FBS)
instacron:FBS
instname_str Fucape Business School (FBS)
instacron_str FBS
institution FBS
reponame_str BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
collection BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv BBR. Brazilian Business Review (English edition. Online) - Fucape Business School (FBS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv || bbronline@bbronline.com.br
_version_ 1754732238491090944