Can continuous glucose monitoring predict cystic fibrosis-related diabetes and worse clinical outcome?

• Autor(a) principal: Zorron,Mariana
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: Marson,Fernando Augusto Lima, Morcillo,André Moreno, Gonçalves,Aline Cristina, El Beck,Mayra de Souza, Ribeiro,José Dirceu, Ribeiro,Antonio Fernando
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia (Online)
• Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132022000200203
• topic: Cystic fibrosis; Glucose intolerance; Glucose tolerance test; Diabetes mellitus

ABSTRACT Objective: To determine whether abnormal continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) readings (hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia) can predict the onset of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) and/or clinical impairment (decline in BMI and/or FEV1) in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Methods: This was a longitudinal prospective cohort study involving CF patients without diabetes at baseline. The mean follow-up period was 3.1 years. The patients underwent 3-day CGM, performed oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and had FEV1 and BMI determined at baseline. OGTT, FEV1, and BMI were reassessed at the end of the follow-up period. Results: Thirty-nine CF patients (10-19 years of age) had valid CGM readings at baseline, and 34 completed the follow-up period (mean = 3.1 ± 0.5 years). None of the study variables predicted progression to CFRD or were associated with hypoglycemic events. CGM could detect glucose abnormalities not revealed by OGTT. Patients with glucose levels ≥ 140 mg/dL, as compared with those with lower levels, on CGM showed lower BMI values and z-scores at baseline-17.30 ± 3.91 kg/m2 vs. 19.42 ± 2.07 kg/m2; p = 0.043; and −1.55 ± 1.68 vs. −0.17 ± 0.88; p = 0.02, respectively-and at the end of follow-up-17.88 ± 3.63 kg/m2 vs. 19.95 ± 2.56 kg/m2; p = 0.039; and −1.65 ± 1.55 vs. −0.42 ± 1.08; p = 0.039. When comparing patients with and without CFRD, the former were found to have worse FEV1 (in % of predicted)-22.67 ± 5.03 vs. 59.58 ± 28.92; p = 0.041-and a greater decline in FEV1 (−36.00 ± 23.52 vs. −8.13 ± 17.18; p = 0.041) at the end of follow-up. Conclusions: CGM was able to identify glucose abnormalities not detected by OGTT that were related to early-stage decreases in BMI. CGM was ineffective in predicting the onset of diabetes in this CF population. Different diagnostic criteria for diabetes may be required for individuals with CF.