The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ortiz, Bruno Martins Duarte
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Fé, Marcelo de Alencar Moura, Medina, José Miguel Garcia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24361
Resumo: The present work aims to analyze the evidence protection technique and its effectiveness in forensic practice. Approach the origins and historical evolution of the temporary protections, focusing on the evidence and its legal evolution. Aim to inquire the low usage reasons of the institute. Its presented some ways examples that law operators can use the institute to achieve more effectiveness in judicial proceedings. The study is based on deductive methodology by bibliographics and legislation. At the end of the study, it concludes that even though the institute exists for a long time, probably its disuse relates to a cultural issue, since the most part of the legal community just remembers the urgency protection and forgot about the evidence protection and its effectiveness.
id UNIFEI_0df1eadc5c7352cfe10714684ac1f286
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24361
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus DisuseCustodia de Evidencia: Efectividad versus DesusoTutela da Evidência: Efetividade versus DesusoTemporary ProtectionEvidence ProtectionSummary CognitionEffectivenessCPC/2015.Custodia TemporariaCustodia de EvidenciaCognición SumariaEfectividadCPC/2015.Tutela ProvisóriaTutela da EvidênciaCognição SumáriaEfetividadeCPC/2015.The present work aims to analyze the evidence protection technique and its effectiveness in forensic practice. Approach the origins and historical evolution of the temporary protections, focusing on the evidence and its legal evolution. Aim to inquire the low usage reasons of the institute. Its presented some ways examples that law operators can use the institute to achieve more effectiveness in judicial proceedings. The study is based on deductive methodology by bibliographics and legislation. At the end of the study, it concludes that even though the institute exists for a long time, probably its disuse relates to a cultural issue, since the most part of the legal community just remembers the urgency protection and forgot about the evidence protection and its effectiveness.Este trabajo tiene como finalidade examinar el instituto de la custodia de evidencia y demostrar su eficacia juridica. Trata de la origen y evolucion historica de las custodias temporarias, con foco en la custodia de evidencia y la evolucion legislativa del instituto. Con el objetivo de descobrir las razones por las cuales el instituto es tan poco usado. Se presenta varios ejemplos de custodia de evidencia e cuales formas los profesionales de derecho pueden valerse para mayor efetividade de la tutela jurisdicional. El estudo se basa en metodología dedutiva de bibliografía y legislaciones. Al final de la pesquisa, se concluye que por más que el instituto exista hace mucho tempo, quizás su desuso se asigna a una cuestión cultural, ya que la maioría de la comunidade jurídica cuando se depara com custodias temporarias, solo se recuerdan de las custodias temporarias de urgência, se olvidando de las custodias de evidéncia y su efetividad.O presente ensaio tem como finalidade analisar o instituto da tutela de evidência e demonstrar a sua eficácia na prática forense. Aborda-se a origem e evolução histórica das tutelas provisórias, com enfoque na tutela da evidência e a evolução legislativa do instituto. Objetiva-se averiguar as razões de o instituto ser tão pouco utilizado na prática forense. São apresentados diversos exemplos de tutela de evidência e de qual maneira os operadores do direito podem se valer do instituto para maior eficácia da tutela jurisdicional. O estudo baseia-se na metodologia dedutiva de bibliografias e das legislações. Ao final da pesquisa, conclui-se que apesar de o instituto já existir há tempos em nosso ordenamento, possivelmente seu desuso se atribui à uma questão cultural, já que a maior parte da comunidade jurídica ao se deparar em tutelas provisórias, apenas se recordam das tutelas provisórias de urgência, muitas vezes se esquecendo da tutela da evidência e sua efetividade.Research, Society and Development2021-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2436110.33448/rsd-v10i17.24361Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 17; e98101724361Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 17; e98101724361Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 17; e981017243612525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24361/21391Copyright (c) 2021 Bruno Martins Duarte Ortiz; Marcelo de Alencar Moura Fé; José Miguel Garcia Medinahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOrtiz, Bruno Martins DuarteFé, Marcelo de Alencar MouraMedina, José Miguel Garcia2022-01-01T11:11:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24361Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:42:56.629196Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse
Custodia de Evidencia: Efectividad versus Desuso
Tutela da Evidência: Efetividade versus Desuso
title The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse
spellingShingle The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse
Ortiz, Bruno Martins Duarte
Temporary Protection
Evidence Protection
Summary Cognition
Effectiveness
CPC/2015.
Custodia Temporaria
Custodia de Evidencia
Cognición Sumaria
Efectividad
CPC/2015.
Tutela Provisória
Tutela da Evidência
Cognição Sumária
Efetividade
CPC/2015.
title_short The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse
title_full The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse
title_fullStr The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse
title_full_unstemmed The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse
title_sort The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse
author Ortiz, Bruno Martins Duarte
author_facet Ortiz, Bruno Martins Duarte
Fé, Marcelo de Alencar Moura
Medina, José Miguel Garcia
author_role author
author2 Fé, Marcelo de Alencar Moura
Medina, José Miguel Garcia
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ortiz, Bruno Martins Duarte
Fé, Marcelo de Alencar Moura
Medina, José Miguel Garcia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Temporary Protection
Evidence Protection
Summary Cognition
Effectiveness
CPC/2015.
Custodia Temporaria
Custodia de Evidencia
Cognición Sumaria
Efectividad
CPC/2015.
Tutela Provisória
Tutela da Evidência
Cognição Sumária
Efetividade
CPC/2015.
topic Temporary Protection
Evidence Protection
Summary Cognition
Effectiveness
CPC/2015.
Custodia Temporaria
Custodia de Evidencia
Cognición Sumaria
Efectividad
CPC/2015.
Tutela Provisória
Tutela da Evidência
Cognição Sumária
Efetividade
CPC/2015.
description The present work aims to analyze the evidence protection technique and its effectiveness in forensic practice. Approach the origins and historical evolution of the temporary protections, focusing on the evidence and its legal evolution. Aim to inquire the low usage reasons of the institute. Its presented some ways examples that law operators can use the institute to achieve more effectiveness in judicial proceedings. The study is based on deductive methodology by bibliographics and legislation. At the end of the study, it concludes that even though the institute exists for a long time, probably its disuse relates to a cultural issue, since the most part of the legal community just remembers the urgency protection and forgot about the evidence protection and its effectiveness.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24361
10.33448/rsd-v10i17.24361
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24361
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i17.24361
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24361/21391
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 17; e98101724361
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 17; e98101724361
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 17; e98101724361
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052820113850368

Registros relacionados