The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24361 |
Resumo: | The present work aims to analyze the evidence protection technique and its effectiveness in forensic practice. Approach the origins and historical evolution of the temporary protections, focusing on the evidence and its legal evolution. Aim to inquire the low usage reasons of the institute. Its presented some ways examples that law operators can use the institute to achieve more effectiveness in judicial proceedings. The study is based on deductive methodology by bibliographics and legislation. At the end of the study, it concludes that even though the institute exists for a long time, probably its disuse relates to a cultural issue, since the most part of the legal community just remembers the urgency protection and forgot about the evidence protection and its effectiveness. |
id |
UNIFEI_0df1eadc5c7352cfe10714684ac1f286 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24361 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus DisuseCustodia de Evidencia: Efectividad versus DesusoTutela da Evidência: Efetividade versus DesusoTemporary ProtectionEvidence ProtectionSummary CognitionEffectivenessCPC/2015.Custodia TemporariaCustodia de EvidenciaCognición SumariaEfectividadCPC/2015.Tutela ProvisóriaTutela da EvidênciaCognição SumáriaEfetividadeCPC/2015.The present work aims to analyze the evidence protection technique and its effectiveness in forensic practice. Approach the origins and historical evolution of the temporary protections, focusing on the evidence and its legal evolution. Aim to inquire the low usage reasons of the institute. Its presented some ways examples that law operators can use the institute to achieve more effectiveness in judicial proceedings. The study is based on deductive methodology by bibliographics and legislation. At the end of the study, it concludes that even though the institute exists for a long time, probably its disuse relates to a cultural issue, since the most part of the legal community just remembers the urgency protection and forgot about the evidence protection and its effectiveness.Este trabajo tiene como finalidade examinar el instituto de la custodia de evidencia y demostrar su eficacia juridica. Trata de la origen y evolucion historica de las custodias temporarias, con foco en la custodia de evidencia y la evolucion legislativa del instituto. Con el objetivo de descobrir las razones por las cuales el instituto es tan poco usado. Se presenta varios ejemplos de custodia de evidencia e cuales formas los profesionales de derecho pueden valerse para mayor efetividade de la tutela jurisdicional. El estudo se basa en metodología dedutiva de bibliografía y legislaciones. Al final de la pesquisa, se concluye que por más que el instituto exista hace mucho tempo, quizás su desuso se asigna a una cuestión cultural, ya que la maioría de la comunidade jurídica cuando se depara com custodias temporarias, solo se recuerdan de las custodias temporarias de urgência, se olvidando de las custodias de evidéncia y su efetividad.O presente ensaio tem como finalidade analisar o instituto da tutela de evidência e demonstrar a sua eficácia na prática forense. Aborda-se a origem e evolução histórica das tutelas provisórias, com enfoque na tutela da evidência e a evolução legislativa do instituto. Objetiva-se averiguar as razões de o instituto ser tão pouco utilizado na prática forense. São apresentados diversos exemplos de tutela de evidência e de qual maneira os operadores do direito podem se valer do instituto para maior eficácia da tutela jurisdicional. O estudo baseia-se na metodologia dedutiva de bibliografias e das legislações. Ao final da pesquisa, conclui-se que apesar de o instituto já existir há tempos em nosso ordenamento, possivelmente seu desuso se atribui à uma questão cultural, já que a maior parte da comunidade jurídica ao se deparar em tutelas provisórias, apenas se recordam das tutelas provisórias de urgência, muitas vezes se esquecendo da tutela da evidência e sua efetividade.Research, Society and Development2021-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2436110.33448/rsd-v10i17.24361Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 17; e98101724361Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 17; e98101724361Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 17; e981017243612525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24361/21391Copyright (c) 2021 Bruno Martins Duarte Ortiz; Marcelo de Alencar Moura Fé; José Miguel Garcia Medinahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOrtiz, Bruno Martins DuarteFé, Marcelo de Alencar MouraMedina, José Miguel Garcia2022-01-01T11:11:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/24361Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:42:56.629196Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse Custodia de Evidencia: Efectividad versus Desuso Tutela da Evidência: Efetividade versus Desuso |
title |
The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse |
spellingShingle |
The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse Ortiz, Bruno Martins Duarte Temporary Protection Evidence Protection Summary Cognition Effectiveness CPC/2015. Custodia Temporaria Custodia de Evidencia Cognición Sumaria Efectividad CPC/2015. Tutela Provisória Tutela da Evidência Cognição Sumária Efetividade CPC/2015. |
title_short |
The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse |
title_full |
The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse |
title_fullStr |
The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse |
title_sort |
The Evidence Protection: Effectiveness versus Disuse |
author |
Ortiz, Bruno Martins Duarte |
author_facet |
Ortiz, Bruno Martins Duarte Fé, Marcelo de Alencar Moura Medina, José Miguel Garcia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fé, Marcelo de Alencar Moura Medina, José Miguel Garcia |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ortiz, Bruno Martins Duarte Fé, Marcelo de Alencar Moura Medina, José Miguel Garcia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Temporary Protection Evidence Protection Summary Cognition Effectiveness CPC/2015. Custodia Temporaria Custodia de Evidencia Cognición Sumaria Efectividad CPC/2015. Tutela Provisória Tutela da Evidência Cognição Sumária Efetividade CPC/2015. |
topic |
Temporary Protection Evidence Protection Summary Cognition Effectiveness CPC/2015. Custodia Temporaria Custodia de Evidencia Cognición Sumaria Efectividad CPC/2015. Tutela Provisória Tutela da Evidência Cognição Sumária Efetividade CPC/2015. |
description |
The present work aims to analyze the evidence protection technique and its effectiveness in forensic practice. Approach the origins and historical evolution of the temporary protections, focusing on the evidence and its legal evolution. Aim to inquire the low usage reasons of the institute. Its presented some ways examples that law operators can use the institute to achieve more effectiveness in judicial proceedings. The study is based on deductive methodology by bibliographics and legislation. At the end of the study, it concludes that even though the institute exists for a long time, probably its disuse relates to a cultural issue, since the most part of the legal community just remembers the urgency protection and forgot about the evidence protection and its effectiveness. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-21 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24361 10.33448/rsd-v10i17.24361 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24361 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i17.24361 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/24361/21391 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 17; e98101724361 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 17; e98101724361 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 17; e98101724361 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052820113850368 |