Genetic linkage maps of chicken chromosomes 6, 7, 8, 11 and 13 from a Brazilian resource population

• Autor(a) principal: Ambo, Marcel
• Data de Publicação: 2008
• Outros Autores: Campos, Raquel de Lello Rocha, Moura, Ana Sílvia Meira Tavares, Boschiero, Clarissa, Rosário, Millor Fernandes do, Ledur, Mônica Corrêa, Nones, Kátia, Coutinho, Luiz Lehmann
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Scientia Agrícola (Online)
• Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/sa/article/view/22320
• topic: Gallus gallus; locos de características quantitativas (QTLs); mapas genéticos; marcadores microssatélites; melhoramento animal; Gallus gallus; quantitative trait loci (QTL); genetic maps; microsatellite markers; animal breeding

A linkage map is essential not only for quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping, but also for the organization and location of genes along the chromosomes. The present study is part of a project whose major objective is, besides from construction the linkage maps, the whole genome scan for mapping QTL for performance traits in the Brazilian experimental chicken population. Linkage maps of chicken chromosomes 6 to 8, 11 and 13 were constructed based on this population. The population was developed from two generations of crossbreeding between a broiler and a layer line. Fifty-one microsatellite markers were tested, from which 28 were informative: 4, 8, 7, 4 and 5 for chromosomes 6, 7, 8, 11 and 13, respectively. A SNP located in the leptin receptor gene was included for chromosome 8. Ten parental, 8 F1 and 459 F2 chickens from five full-sib families were genotyped with these markers. The number of total informative meioses per locus varied from 232 to 862, and the number of phase-known informative meioses from 0 to 764. Marker orders in the chromosomes coincided with those of the chicken consensus map, except for markers ADL0147 and MCW0213, on chromosome 13, which were inverted. The reduced number of phase-known informative meioses for ADL0147 (150) may be pointed out as a possible cause for this inversion, apart from the relative short distance between the two markers involved in the inversion (10.5 cM).