Conciliação de metas, relevância e reestruturação cognitiva de crenças intermediárias

• Autor(a) principal: Bez, Andréia da Silva
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/3435
• topic: Pragmática Cognitiva; Teoria de conciliação de metas; Teoria da relevância; Terapia cognitiva; Reestruturação de crenças intermediárias

We claim in this study that the communicative interactions, which are necessary to restructure the intermediate beliefs in cognitive therapy, could be described and explained in the scope of plans of intentional actions. In those plans, the agent must mobilize ante-factual abductive hypotheses to both patient and therapist achieve goal empirical conciliations collaboratively, weakening the connection between antecedents and consequents of dysfunctional conditional assumptions, and strengthening the connection between antecedents and consequents of (more) functional conditional assumptions. In achieving this demand, we reviewed theoreticalmethodological notions of cognitive therapy (especially BECK, J., 2013; BECK, A.; ALFORD, 2000, BECK, A. et al., 1997), relevance theory (SPERBER; WILSON, 1986, 1995), and goal conciliation theory (RAUEN, 2013, 2014). Next, we analyse an extract of therapeutic session specifically designed to illustrate the modification of an intermediate belief (BECK, J., 2013, p. 236-237). The results point to goal conciliationtheoretic modelling (RAUEN, 2014) —integrated with relevance-theoretic modelling (SPERBER; WILSON, 1986, 1995) — allow describing and explaining pragmatic-cognitive processes in cognitive restructuring of a dysfunctional intermediate belief. Additionally, the results point that the communicative interaction in the therapeutic session is part of a complex plan of intentional action based on collaborative empiricism and guided by the theoretic notion of goal hetero-conciliation. This complex plan of intentional action consists of enabling antecedent actions specially designed to weaken the connection between the antecedent and the consequent of a dysfunctional conditional assumption to a tautological level firstly, and to strengthen the connection between the antecedent and the consequent of a conditional assumption (more) functional at least to a conditional level, secondly. Furthermore, the collaborative empiricism of this complex plan is made possible by communicative interactions, as enabling antecedent actions with three intentional layers. The first one is the communicative intention of making mutually manifest a set of information, the second one is informative intention of making manifest a set of information, and the third one is a practical or pragmatic intention of achieving goals or subgoals in the scope of hetero-conciliating chains of goals and sub-goals.