Estudo comparativo entre certificações ambientais aplicáveis a edifícios residenciais
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Trabalho de conclusão de curso |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/4291 |
Resumo: | One of the permanent challenges of this century is undoubtedly to break the conflicts between development and environment preservation or at least settle the demands of both and address the construction impacts on the environment. The concern with the impacts caused to the environment and the use of natural and non-renewable resources reached greater proportions in the 90’s. Several countries showed fully committed to the ideal of developing methodologies for the environmental performance of buildings since the construction sector consumes a big amount of natural resources and is responsible for generating significant environment impacts during the process and the activities related to the entire construction chain, operation and demolition services. The objective of this research is to assess the minimal requirements to obtain the five most usual environmental certifications in civil engineering – LEED, AQUA-HQE, EDGE, PROCEL Edifica and SELO AZUL CAIXA – and the degree of rigor for the qualification and what the consequences of obtaining each certification seeking to identify the extent of adequacy for the construction industry. For this, was developed a comparative analysis between the required indicators and parameters of the certification systems and the environmental assessment. The methodology resulted in a proposal of a common organization system that was able reconcile the structure of certification and evaluation systems. From the compatibility of the structure of the evaluation systems of each environmental certification to meet a single parameter of benchmarking, in general terms, it remained possible the comparative analysis, identification of the common subcategories from the analyzed systems and which one of them meet the requirements of environment adequacy conditions. |
id |
Ânima_40561521e38d16d8ddee0b3c3a0eced0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/4291 |
network_acronym_str |
Ânima |
network_name_str |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Estudo comparativo entre certificações ambientais aplicáveis a edifícios residenciaisCertificação ambientalSustentabilidadeLEEDOne of the permanent challenges of this century is undoubtedly to break the conflicts between development and environment preservation or at least settle the demands of both and address the construction impacts on the environment. The concern with the impacts caused to the environment and the use of natural and non-renewable resources reached greater proportions in the 90’s. Several countries showed fully committed to the ideal of developing methodologies for the environmental performance of buildings since the construction sector consumes a big amount of natural resources and is responsible for generating significant environment impacts during the process and the activities related to the entire construction chain, operation and demolition services. The objective of this research is to assess the minimal requirements to obtain the five most usual environmental certifications in civil engineering – LEED, AQUA-HQE, EDGE, PROCEL Edifica and SELO AZUL CAIXA – and the degree of rigor for the qualification and what the consequences of obtaining each certification seeking to identify the extent of adequacy for the construction industry. For this, was developed a comparative analysis between the required indicators and parameters of the certification systems and the environmental assessment. The methodology resulted in a proposal of a common organization system that was able reconcile the structure of certification and evaluation systems. From the compatibility of the structure of the evaluation systems of each environmental certification to meet a single parameter of benchmarking, in general terms, it remained possible the comparative analysis, identification of the common subcategories from the analyzed systems and which one of them meet the requirements of environment adequacy conditions.Um dos desafios permanentes deste século é, sem dúvida, superar o conflito entre desenvolvimento e preservação do meio ambiente ou, no mínimo compor ambas as necessidades de modo a equacionar os impactos construtivos sobre o meio. Tal preocupação com os impactos causados ao meio ambiente, o consumo de recursos naturais e não renováveis atingiu na década de 90, efetivamente, maiores proporções. Diversos países se mobilizaram no ideal de desenvolver metodologias para o desempenho ambiental das edificações diante da construção civil, por se tratar de um setor que além de consumir grande quantidade de recursos naturais é o responsável por gerar expressivos impactos ambientais durante as atividades relacionadas a toda a cadeia de construção, operação e demolição. Este trabalho, portanto, tem como objetivo avaliar os requisitos necessários para obtenção das cinco certificações ambientais mais utilizadas na engenharia civil – LEED, AQUA-HQE, EDGE, PROCEL Edifica e SELO AZUL CAIXA – em projetos de engenharia civil, qual o grau de rigor para a qualificação e quais decorrências da obtenção de cada certificação, buscando identificar qual grau de adequação para a construção civil. O método de pesquisa adotado foi uma revisão bibliográfica de cunho descritivo, exploratório e qualitativo. Para isto foi realizada uma análise comparativa entre os critérios e indicadores exigidos pelos sistemas de certificação e avaliação ambiental. A metodologia resultou na elaboração de uma proposta de uma estrutura em comum para organizar e compatibilizar os dados dos sistemas de certificação e avaliação. Com a compatibilização da estrutura dos sistemas de avaliação de cada certificação ambiental para contemplar a um parâmetro único de aferição dos critérios, em termos gerais, restou possível a análise comparativa, a identificação das subcategorias comuns aos sistemas analisados e quais contemplam os requisitos de adequação ambiental mais rigorosos.Schwinden, Norma Beatriz CamisãoBarcelos, Khétlyn Karolyne Rodrigues2019-06-27T23:03:28Z2020-11-26T23:31:50Z2019-06-27T23:03:28Z2020-11-26T23:31:50Z2019info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis90 f.application/pdfhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/4291Engenharia Civil - TubarãoTubarãoAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)instname:Ânima Educaçãoinstacron:Ânima2020-12-01T17:23:03Zoai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/4291Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/oai/requestcontato@animaeducacao.com.bropendoar:2020-12-01T17:23:03Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Estudo comparativo entre certificações ambientais aplicáveis a edifícios residenciais |
title |
Estudo comparativo entre certificações ambientais aplicáveis a edifícios residenciais |
spellingShingle |
Estudo comparativo entre certificações ambientais aplicáveis a edifícios residenciais Barcelos, Khétlyn Karolyne Rodrigues Certificação ambiental Sustentabilidade LEED |
title_short |
Estudo comparativo entre certificações ambientais aplicáveis a edifícios residenciais |
title_full |
Estudo comparativo entre certificações ambientais aplicáveis a edifícios residenciais |
title_fullStr |
Estudo comparativo entre certificações ambientais aplicáveis a edifícios residenciais |
title_full_unstemmed |
Estudo comparativo entre certificações ambientais aplicáveis a edifícios residenciais |
title_sort |
Estudo comparativo entre certificações ambientais aplicáveis a edifícios residenciais |
author |
Barcelos, Khétlyn Karolyne Rodrigues |
author_facet |
Barcelos, Khétlyn Karolyne Rodrigues |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Schwinden, Norma Beatriz Camisão |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barcelos, Khétlyn Karolyne Rodrigues |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Certificação ambiental Sustentabilidade LEED |
topic |
Certificação ambiental Sustentabilidade LEED |
description |
One of the permanent challenges of this century is undoubtedly to break the conflicts between development and environment preservation or at least settle the demands of both and address the construction impacts on the environment. The concern with the impacts caused to the environment and the use of natural and non-renewable resources reached greater proportions in the 90’s. Several countries showed fully committed to the ideal of developing methodologies for the environmental performance of buildings since the construction sector consumes a big amount of natural resources and is responsible for generating significant environment impacts during the process and the activities related to the entire construction chain, operation and demolition services. The objective of this research is to assess the minimal requirements to obtain the five most usual environmental certifications in civil engineering – LEED, AQUA-HQE, EDGE, PROCEL Edifica and SELO AZUL CAIXA – and the degree of rigor for the qualification and what the consequences of obtaining each certification seeking to identify the extent of adequacy for the construction industry. For this, was developed a comparative analysis between the required indicators and parameters of the certification systems and the environmental assessment. The methodology resulted in a proposal of a common organization system that was able reconcile the structure of certification and evaluation systems. From the compatibility of the structure of the evaluation systems of each environmental certification to meet a single parameter of benchmarking, in general terms, it remained possible the comparative analysis, identification of the common subcategories from the analyzed systems and which one of them meet the requirements of environment adequacy conditions. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-06-27T23:03:28Z 2019-06-27T23:03:28Z 2019 2020-11-26T23:31:50Z 2020-11-26T23:31:50Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
format |
bachelorThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/4291 |
url |
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/4291 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Engenharia Civil - Tubarão |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
90 f. application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Tubarão |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) instname:Ânima Educação instacron:Ânima |
instname_str |
Ânima Educação |
instacron_str |
Ânima |
institution |
Ânima |
reponame_str |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
collection |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
contato@animaeducacao.com.br |
_version_ |
1767415832620564480 |