Dolo eventual ou culpa consciente: análise dos julgados dos crimes de homicídio culposo na direção de veículo automotor estando o motorista sob influência de álcool ou outras substâncias psicoativas
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Trabalho de conclusão de curso |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/15455 |
Resumo: | This research aimed to analyze the judgments of the crimes of manslaughter in the direction of a motor vehicle when the driver is under the influence of alcohol or other psychoactive substances, especially after the insertion of § 3, article 302, of the Brazilian Traffic Code, the sentence passed to be imprisoned for five to eight years, causing divergence as to the principle of proportionality, compared to the penalty provided for manslaughter, typified in the Penal Code. A study was carried out based on the analysis of 20 (twenty) cases judged by several Federal Court of Justice. Data collection was performed by searching the website of this court, by searching for key words (drunkenness; wrongful death; article 302; possible fraud; conscious guilt). The results indicate that there is disagreement as to the characterization of eventual fraud or conscious guilt, since, depending on the subjective type, the judgment will be made in a totally different way. It was observed that, there is no “formula” to frame a situation in willful crime and another in culprit crime. It was found that drunkenness alone is not a reason to be brought to trial by the Jury Tribunal. The results showed that, among 20 (twenty) decisions, 7 (seven) were considered intentional crimes, while 13 (thirteen) judged were classified as culpable crime. Another point to be noted was that accidents occurred most often between Friday and Sunday, between 4:00 pm and 8:00 am. The main defensive thesis to try to disqualify the willful crime is that the conduct of drunk driving is found in the special legislation, coupled with the fact that it cannot conclude what the agent's will was at the moment of the accident, that is, if he acted with eventual intent or conscious guilt. Finally, it was found that the legislative change did not have a positive impact, given that the penalty is concise compared to the penalty provided for in the Penal Code. |
id |
Ânima_6a535fe3ef42a6660e8484419e7e9918 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/15455 |
network_acronym_str |
Ânima |
network_name_str |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Dolo eventual ou culpa consciente: análise dos julgados dos crimes de homicídio culposo na direção de veículo automotor estando o motorista sob influência de álcool ou outras substâncias psicoativasEmbriaguezHomicídio CulposoCódigo de Trânsito BrasileiroThis research aimed to analyze the judgments of the crimes of manslaughter in the direction of a motor vehicle when the driver is under the influence of alcohol or other psychoactive substances, especially after the insertion of § 3, article 302, of the Brazilian Traffic Code, the sentence passed to be imprisoned for five to eight years, causing divergence as to the principle of proportionality, compared to the penalty provided for manslaughter, typified in the Penal Code. A study was carried out based on the analysis of 20 (twenty) cases judged by several Federal Court of Justice. Data collection was performed by searching the website of this court, by searching for key words (drunkenness; wrongful death; article 302; possible fraud; conscious guilt). The results indicate that there is disagreement as to the characterization of eventual fraud or conscious guilt, since, depending on the subjective type, the judgment will be made in a totally different way. It was observed that, there is no “formula” to frame a situation in willful crime and another in culprit crime. It was found that drunkenness alone is not a reason to be brought to trial by the Jury Tribunal. The results showed that, among 20 (twenty) decisions, 7 (seven) were considered intentional crimes, while 13 (thirteen) judged were classified as culpable crime. Another point to be noted was that accidents occurred most often between Friday and Sunday, between 4:00 pm and 8:00 am. The main defensive thesis to try to disqualify the willful crime is that the conduct of drunk driving is found in the special legislation, coupled with the fact that it cannot conclude what the agent's will was at the moment of the accident, that is, if he acted with eventual intent or conscious guilt. Finally, it was found that the legislative change did not have a positive impact, given that the penalty is concise compared to the penalty provided for in the Penal Code.Esta pesquisa objetivou a análise dos julgados dos crimes de homicídio culposo na direção de veículo automotor estando o motorista sob influência de álcool ou outras substâncias psicoativas, principalmente após a inserção do § 3º, do artigo 302, do Código de Trânsito Brasileiro, a pena passou a ser de reclusão de 05 (cinco) a 08 (oito) anos, causando divergência quanto ao princípio da proporcionalidade, se comparado com a pena prevista para o homicídio culposo, tipificado no Código Penal. Foi realizado um estudo a partir da análise de 20 (vinte) processos julgados por diversos Tribunal de Justiça dos entes federativos. A coleta de dados foi realizada mediante busca no site deste tribunal, através de busca por palavras chaves (embriaguez; homicídio culposo; artigo 302; dolo eventual; culpa consciente). Os resultados indicam que há divergência quanto a caracterização do dolo eventual ou da culpa consciente, visto que, dependendo do tipo subjetivo, o julgamento far-se-á de forma totalmente diversa. Observou-se que, não há uma “fórmula” para enquadrar uma situação em crime doloso e outra em crime culposo. Verificou-se que a ebriedade por si só, não é motivo para ser levado ao julgamento do Tribunal do Júri. Os resultados apontaram que, dentre 20 (vinte) decisões, 07 (sete) foram considerados crimes dolosos, enquanto 13 (treze) julgados foram classificados como crime culposo. Outro ponto a ser observado foi que, os acidentes ocorreram na maioria das vezes entre sexta-feira a domingo, no período entre as 16h00 às 08h00. A principal tese defensiva para tentar desqualificar o crime doloso é que a conduta de dirigir embriagado encontra-se na legislação especial, aliado ao fato de não poder concluir qual a vontade do agente no momento do acidente, ou seja, se agiu com dolo eventual ou culpa consciente. Por fim, verificou-se que a mudança legislativa não causou impacto positivo, haja vista que a pena é concisa se comparada com a pena prevista no Código Penal.Lisboa, Silvio RobertoFirmiano, Vitor2020-12-14T13:20:30Z2021-08-04T16:21:50Z2020-12-14T13:20:30Z2021-08-04T16:21:50Z2020info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis92 f.application/pdfhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/15455Direito - TubarãoTubarão/SCAttribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)instname:Ânima Educaçãoinstacron:Ânima2021-08-06T07:40:36Zoai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/15455Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/oai/requestcontato@animaeducacao.com.bropendoar:2021-08-06T07:40:36Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dolo eventual ou culpa consciente: análise dos julgados dos crimes de homicídio culposo na direção de veículo automotor estando o motorista sob influência de álcool ou outras substâncias psicoativas |
title |
Dolo eventual ou culpa consciente: análise dos julgados dos crimes de homicídio culposo na direção de veículo automotor estando o motorista sob influência de álcool ou outras substâncias psicoativas |
spellingShingle |
Dolo eventual ou culpa consciente: análise dos julgados dos crimes de homicídio culposo na direção de veículo automotor estando o motorista sob influência de álcool ou outras substâncias psicoativas Firmiano, Vitor Embriaguez Homicídio Culposo Código de Trânsito Brasileiro |
title_short |
Dolo eventual ou culpa consciente: análise dos julgados dos crimes de homicídio culposo na direção de veículo automotor estando o motorista sob influência de álcool ou outras substâncias psicoativas |
title_full |
Dolo eventual ou culpa consciente: análise dos julgados dos crimes de homicídio culposo na direção de veículo automotor estando o motorista sob influência de álcool ou outras substâncias psicoativas |
title_fullStr |
Dolo eventual ou culpa consciente: análise dos julgados dos crimes de homicídio culposo na direção de veículo automotor estando o motorista sob influência de álcool ou outras substâncias psicoativas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dolo eventual ou culpa consciente: análise dos julgados dos crimes de homicídio culposo na direção de veículo automotor estando o motorista sob influência de álcool ou outras substâncias psicoativas |
title_sort |
Dolo eventual ou culpa consciente: análise dos julgados dos crimes de homicídio culposo na direção de veículo automotor estando o motorista sob influência de álcool ou outras substâncias psicoativas |
author |
Firmiano, Vitor |
author_facet |
Firmiano, Vitor |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Lisboa, Silvio Roberto |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Firmiano, Vitor |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Embriaguez Homicídio Culposo Código de Trânsito Brasileiro |
topic |
Embriaguez Homicídio Culposo Código de Trânsito Brasileiro |
description |
This research aimed to analyze the judgments of the crimes of manslaughter in the direction of a motor vehicle when the driver is under the influence of alcohol or other psychoactive substances, especially after the insertion of § 3, article 302, of the Brazilian Traffic Code, the sentence passed to be imprisoned for five to eight years, causing divergence as to the principle of proportionality, compared to the penalty provided for manslaughter, typified in the Penal Code. A study was carried out based on the analysis of 20 (twenty) cases judged by several Federal Court of Justice. Data collection was performed by searching the website of this court, by searching for key words (drunkenness; wrongful death; article 302; possible fraud; conscious guilt). The results indicate that there is disagreement as to the characterization of eventual fraud or conscious guilt, since, depending on the subjective type, the judgment will be made in a totally different way. It was observed that, there is no “formula” to frame a situation in willful crime and another in culprit crime. It was found that drunkenness alone is not a reason to be brought to trial by the Jury Tribunal. The results showed that, among 20 (twenty) decisions, 7 (seven) were considered intentional crimes, while 13 (thirteen) judged were classified as culpable crime. Another point to be noted was that accidents occurred most often between Friday and Sunday, between 4:00 pm and 8:00 am. The main defensive thesis to try to disqualify the willful crime is that the conduct of drunk driving is found in the special legislation, coupled with the fact that it cannot conclude what the agent's will was at the moment of the accident, that is, if he acted with eventual intent or conscious guilt. Finally, it was found that the legislative change did not have a positive impact, given that the penalty is concise compared to the penalty provided for in the Penal Code. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-14T13:20:30Z 2020-12-14T13:20:30Z 2020 2021-08-04T16:21:50Z 2021-08-04T16:21:50Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
format |
bachelorThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/15455 |
url |
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/15455 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Direito - Tubarão |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
92 f. application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Tubarão/SC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) instname:Ânima Educação instacron:Ânima |
instname_str |
Ânima Educação |
instacron_str |
Ânima |
institution |
Ânima |
reponame_str |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
collection |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
contato@animaeducacao.com.br |
_version_ |
1767415842940649472 |