A estabilização da tutela de urgência antecipada requerida em caráter antecedente e o instituto da coisa julgada

• Autor(a) principal: Bernardo, Katrine Vieira
• Data de Publicação: 2019
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/7534
• topic: Código de Processo Civil de 2015; Tutelas de urgência antecedente; Tutelas provisórias; Estabilização da tutela provisória; Coisa julgada

This monograph aims to analyze the stabilization of the anticipated guardianship required in advance and the institute of res judicata. The new Code of Civil Procedure provided for the possibility of stabilizing the decision granting the anticipated tutelage in advance, if the defendant does not appeal, with a deadline for this decision to be reviewed, reformed or invalidated, which led to doctrinal discussion around the attribution of the force of the judged thing to a tutelage given in summary cognition. In this sense, using doctrinal and jurisprudential analyzes on the subject, the present academic production seeks to understand the effects of the stabilization of the anticipated tutelage from its opposition to the res judicata, analyzing the arguments used in defense of the possibility or not of the incidence of the res judicata. after the decay period provided for by law. To achieve this purpose, the constitutional principles applied in the provisional guardianship will be analyzed first, and then the provisional guardianship in the current legal order will be addressed, with its historical evolution, its functions, the concepts, the characteristics and the classification. of guardianship. Subsequently, the institute for the stabilization of provisional protection will be analyzed, so that it is possible to understand the central theme of the present monograph. Finally, we study the institute of the res judicata and its effectiveness, analyzing the possibility of its impact on terminative decisions based on summary cognition, with due jurisprudential analysis on the subject, and it can be concluded that the effects of stabilization are not confused with the judged thing.