admissibilidade da prova ilícita no processo civil a luz do princípio de proporcionalidade
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Trabalho de conclusão de curso |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5663 |
Resumo: | It is undeniable that with the promulgation of the 1988 Federal Constitution, a series of fundamental principles and guarantees emerged that aim to ensure the dignity, freedom and equality of the individual. These principles and guarantees are enshrined in the process of relating this individual to the society to which he belongs. If the Constitution deals with the right to that individual freedom, as it actually does, it questions, however, the means by which they can be tried and effectively admitted to the illicit evidence in the process. Based on this reality, this final course work aims to analyze the admissibility of illicit evidence under the focus of the principle of proportionality in cases in civil areas, whose specific objectives are the analysis of illicit evidence by derivation and its practical consequences , as well as, the examination of the flexibility of the doctrine with respect to the admissibility of these tests under the perspective of the principle of proportionality. To achieve these objectives, the hypothetical-deductive method was used as a methodological instrument, in order to analyze the illicit evidence in the civil process, thus using techniques of bibliographic and legislative revision, paying attention to the principle of proportionality. Therefore, there is a broad discussion on the subject in the legal sphere, since, on the one hand, the Federal Constitution expressly disallows, in the process, the evidence obtained through illicit means (art. 5, LVI), but on the other, part The doctrine speaks of relativization, since fundamental rights would not have an absolute character, which is why the discussion on the theme raised in this course conclusion work is justified by its importance. |
id |
Ânima_8d182762d4eda79bfb194e4f1f5d73f6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/5663 |
network_acronym_str |
Ânima |
network_name_str |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
admissibilidade da prova ilícita no processo civil a luz do princípio de proporcionalidadeadmissibility of illegal proof in the civil process in the light of the principle of proportionalityprova ilícitaprincípio da proporcionalidadeprocesso civilIt is undeniable that with the promulgation of the 1988 Federal Constitution, a series of fundamental principles and guarantees emerged that aim to ensure the dignity, freedom and equality of the individual. These principles and guarantees are enshrined in the process of relating this individual to the society to which he belongs. If the Constitution deals with the right to that individual freedom, as it actually does, it questions, however, the means by which they can be tried and effectively admitted to the illicit evidence in the process. Based on this reality, this final course work aims to analyze the admissibility of illicit evidence under the focus of the principle of proportionality in cases in civil areas, whose specific objectives are the analysis of illicit evidence by derivation and its practical consequences , as well as, the examination of the flexibility of the doctrine with respect to the admissibility of these tests under the perspective of the principle of proportionality. To achieve these objectives, the hypothetical-deductive method was used as a methodological instrument, in order to analyze the illicit evidence in the civil process, thus using techniques of bibliographic and legislative revision, paying attention to the principle of proportionality. Therefore, there is a broad discussion on the subject in the legal sphere, since, on the one hand, the Federal Constitution expressly disallows, in the process, the evidence obtained through illicit means (art. 5, LVI), but on the other, part The doctrine speaks of relativization, since fundamental rights would not have an absolute character, which is why the discussion on the theme raised in this course conclusion work is justified by its importance.É incontestável que com a promulgação da Constituição Federal de 1988 surgiu uma série de princípios e garantias fundamentais que visam assegurar a dignidade, liberdade e igualdade do indivíduo. Esses princípios e garantias estão consagrados mediante o processo de relacionamento desse indivíduo com a sociedade a qual ele está inserido. Se a Constituição trata do direito a essa liberdade individual, como de fato faz, questiona-se, no entanto, os meios pelos quais podem ser julgadas e efetivamente admitidas às provas ilícitas no processo. A partir dessa realidade, esse trabalho de conclusão de curso tem por objetivo geral a análise da admissibilidade das provas ilícitas sob o enfoque do princípio da proporcionalidade em processos nas áreas cíveis, cujos objetivos específicos são a análise das provas, classificação e finalidade, atentando para as consequências práticas acerca da admissibilidade da prova ilícita no âmbito cível, sob a ótica do princípio da proporcionalidade. Para alcançar tais objetivos, utilizou-se como instrumento metodológico o método hipotético-dedutivo, a fim de analisar a prova ilícita no processo civil, utilizando-se, assim, de técnicas de revisão bibliográfica e legislativa, atentando-se para o princípio da proporcionalidade. Vislumbra-se, portanto, a ampla discussão sobre o assunto no âmbito jurídico já que, por um lado, a Constituição Federal expressamente inadmite, no processo, as provas obtidas por meio ilícitos (art. 5º, LVI), por outro lado, parte da doutrina defende a relativização, já que os direitos fundamentais não teriam caráter absoluto, razão pela qual a discussão acerca do tema levantado nesse trabalho de conclusão de curso justifica-se pela sua importância.Berkenbrock, Cristiano José da RosaMarcos, Cleris2020-07-10T15:11:07Z2020-11-27T02:37:39Z2020-07-10T15:11:07Z2020-11-27T02:37:39Z2020info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis58application/pdfhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5663Direito - TubarãoTubarãoAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)instname:Ânima Educaçãoinstacron:Ânima2020-12-01T20:36:37Zoai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/5663Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/oai/requestcontato@animaeducacao.com.bropendoar:2020-12-01T20:36:37Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
admissibilidade da prova ilícita no processo civil a luz do princípio de proporcionalidade admissibility of illegal proof in the civil process in the light of the principle of proportionality |
title |
admissibilidade da prova ilícita no processo civil a luz do princípio de proporcionalidade |
spellingShingle |
admissibilidade da prova ilícita no processo civil a luz do princípio de proporcionalidade Marcos, Cleris prova ilícita princípio da proporcionalidade processo civil |
title_short |
admissibilidade da prova ilícita no processo civil a luz do princípio de proporcionalidade |
title_full |
admissibilidade da prova ilícita no processo civil a luz do princípio de proporcionalidade |
title_fullStr |
admissibilidade da prova ilícita no processo civil a luz do princípio de proporcionalidade |
title_full_unstemmed |
admissibilidade da prova ilícita no processo civil a luz do princípio de proporcionalidade |
title_sort |
admissibilidade da prova ilícita no processo civil a luz do princípio de proporcionalidade |
author |
Marcos, Cleris |
author_facet |
Marcos, Cleris |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Berkenbrock, Cristiano José da Rosa |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Marcos, Cleris |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
prova ilícita princípio da proporcionalidade processo civil |
topic |
prova ilícita princípio da proporcionalidade processo civil |
description |
It is undeniable that with the promulgation of the 1988 Federal Constitution, a series of fundamental principles and guarantees emerged that aim to ensure the dignity, freedom and equality of the individual. These principles and guarantees are enshrined in the process of relating this individual to the society to which he belongs. If the Constitution deals with the right to that individual freedom, as it actually does, it questions, however, the means by which they can be tried and effectively admitted to the illicit evidence in the process. Based on this reality, this final course work aims to analyze the admissibility of illicit evidence under the focus of the principle of proportionality in cases in civil areas, whose specific objectives are the analysis of illicit evidence by derivation and its practical consequences , as well as, the examination of the flexibility of the doctrine with respect to the admissibility of these tests under the perspective of the principle of proportionality. To achieve these objectives, the hypothetical-deductive method was used as a methodological instrument, in order to analyze the illicit evidence in the civil process, thus using techniques of bibliographic and legislative revision, paying attention to the principle of proportionality. Therefore, there is a broad discussion on the subject in the legal sphere, since, on the one hand, the Federal Constitution expressly disallows, in the process, the evidence obtained through illicit means (art. 5, LVI), but on the other, part The doctrine speaks of relativization, since fundamental rights would not have an absolute character, which is why the discussion on the theme raised in this course conclusion work is justified by its importance. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07-10T15:11:07Z 2020-11-27T02:37:39Z 2020-07-10T15:11:07Z 2020-11-27T02:37:39Z 2020 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
format |
bachelorThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5663 |
url |
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5663 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Direito - Tubarão |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
58 application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Tubarão |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) instname:Ânima Educação instacron:Ânima |
instname_str |
Ânima Educação |
instacron_str |
Ânima |
institution |
Ânima |
reponame_str |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
collection |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
contato@animaeducacao.com.br |
_version_ |
1767415833223495680 |