O instituto da colaboração premiada à luz da Lei nº 12.850/2013 e o princípio da imparcialidade
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Trabalho de conclusão de curso |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
Texto Completo: | https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5895 |
Resumo: | The institute of award-winning collaboration, currently established in Brazil through Law no 12,850 / 2013, is a historical landmark for combating organized crime, providing a means to help solve the great problem that affects our country, which are crimes committed by criminal organizations, so difficult to investigate. However, there are several discussions on the ethics and constitutionality of the negotiations conducted by the Public Prosecutor's Office, together with the police officer and the accused. Thus, the objective of the present research is to analyze if the institute of the awarded collaboration and its peculiarities in the light of Law nº 12.850 / 2013 end up violating the principle of the impartiality of the judge. For that, a bibliographic and documentary research was carried out, starting from an inductive analysis, with qualitative approach and the exploratory level, using the bibliographic and documentary file as instrument for data collection, considering that the present research was based in national legislation, in doctrines, scientific articles and jurisprudence. From the results obtained, it was concluded that despite being criticized for a good part of the doctrine, the institute of the awarded collaboration is constitutional and ethical, since, once the procedures of the competent legislation have been respected, the acts carried out in the negotiations of the agreement are not vitiated by vices tending to cause nullity or any prejudice to the evidence obtained through the Institute, even though the elements raised through collaboration alone are not sufficient to sustain a conviction. Thus, if the magistrate complies with the limits set forth in the law, not participating directly in the negotiations and only approving the agreement, acting as a prosecutor of the legality, voluntariness and regularity of the collaboration, his acts do not prejudice his impartiality. |
id |
Ânima_a3c3fc8f504e3acf664317abc80e61fb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/5895 |
network_acronym_str |
Ânima |
network_name_str |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
O instituto da colaboração premiada à luz da Lei nº 12.850/2013 e o princípio da imparcialidadeThe collaboration institute awarded to light of Law nº 12.850 / 2013 and the principle of impartialityDireito processual penalDireito penalColaboração premiadaCrime organizadoThe institute of award-winning collaboration, currently established in Brazil through Law no 12,850 / 2013, is a historical landmark for combating organized crime, providing a means to help solve the great problem that affects our country, which are crimes committed by criminal organizations, so difficult to investigate. However, there are several discussions on the ethics and constitutionality of the negotiations conducted by the Public Prosecutor's Office, together with the police officer and the accused. Thus, the objective of the present research is to analyze if the institute of the awarded collaboration and its peculiarities in the light of Law nº 12.850 / 2013 end up violating the principle of the impartiality of the judge. For that, a bibliographic and documentary research was carried out, starting from an inductive analysis, with qualitative approach and the exploratory level, using the bibliographic and documentary file as instrument for data collection, considering that the present research was based in national legislation, in doctrines, scientific articles and jurisprudence. From the results obtained, it was concluded that despite being criticized for a good part of the doctrine, the institute of the awarded collaboration is constitutional and ethical, since, once the procedures of the competent legislation have been respected, the acts carried out in the negotiations of the agreement are not vitiated by vices tending to cause nullity or any prejudice to the evidence obtained through the Institute, even though the elements raised through collaboration alone are not sufficient to sustain a conviction. Thus, if the magistrate complies with the limits set forth in the law, not participating directly in the negotiations and only approving the agreement, acting as a prosecutor of the legality, voluntariness and regularity of the collaboration, his acts do not prejudice his impartiality.O instituto da colaboração premiada, instituído atualmente no Brasil por meio da Lei nº 12.850/2013, é um marco histórico para o combate ao crime organizado, trazendo um meio para auxiliar na solução do grande problema que afeta a nossa pátria, que são os crimes cometidos por organizações criminosas, tão difíceis de serem investigados. Entretanto, diversas são as discussões sobre a ética e a constitucionalidade das negociações feitas pelo Ministério Público, juntamente com o delegado de polícia e o investigado/acusado. Deste modo, o objetivo da presente pesquisa é analisar se o instituto da colaboração premiada e suas particularidades à luz da Lei nº 12.850/2013 acabam ferindo o princípio da imparcialidade do juiz. Para tanto, realizou-se uma pesquisa bibliográfica e documental, partindo de uma análise indutiva, com abordagem qualitativa e o nível exploratório, utilizando-se o fichamento bibliográfico e documental como instrumento para coleta de dados, tendo em vista que a presente pesquisa se fundamentou na legislação pátria, em doutrinas, artigos científicos e jurisprudências. A partir dos resultados obtidos, concluiu-se que apesar de ser criticada por uma boa parte da doutrina, o instituto da colaboração premiada é constitucional e ético, já que, uma vez respeitados os trâmites da legislação competente, os atos realizados nas negociações do acordo não são eivados de vícios tendentes a causar uma nulidade ou qualquer prejuízo para as provas obtidas através do instituto, até mesmo porque os elementos angariados por meio da colaboração, por si sós, não são suficientes para sustentar uma condenação. Assim, caso o magistrado siga seus limites expostos na lei, não participando diretamente das negociações e apenas homologando o acordo, atuando como fiscal da legalidade, voluntariedade e regularidade da colaboração, seus atos não ferem sua imparcialidade.Sabino, Rafael GiordaniZavaski, Marcelo Mello2019-07-05T20:25:20Z2020-11-27T03:08:56Z2019-07-05T20:25:20Z2020-11-27T03:08:56Z2019info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis67 f.application/pdfhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5895Direito - TubarãoTubarãoAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)instname:Ânima Educaçãoinstacron:Ânima2020-12-01T20:51:12Zoai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/5895Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/oai/requestcontato@animaeducacao.com.bropendoar:2020-12-01T20:51:12Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
O instituto da colaboração premiada à luz da Lei nº 12.850/2013 e o princípio da imparcialidade The collaboration institute awarded to light of Law nº 12.850 / 2013 and the principle of impartiality |
title |
O instituto da colaboração premiada à luz da Lei nº 12.850/2013 e o princípio da imparcialidade |
spellingShingle |
O instituto da colaboração premiada à luz da Lei nº 12.850/2013 e o princípio da imparcialidade Zavaski, Marcelo Mello Direito processual penal Direito penal Colaboração premiada Crime organizado |
title_short |
O instituto da colaboração premiada à luz da Lei nº 12.850/2013 e o princípio da imparcialidade |
title_full |
O instituto da colaboração premiada à luz da Lei nº 12.850/2013 e o princípio da imparcialidade |
title_fullStr |
O instituto da colaboração premiada à luz da Lei nº 12.850/2013 e o princípio da imparcialidade |
title_full_unstemmed |
O instituto da colaboração premiada à luz da Lei nº 12.850/2013 e o princípio da imparcialidade |
title_sort |
O instituto da colaboração premiada à luz da Lei nº 12.850/2013 e o princípio da imparcialidade |
author |
Zavaski, Marcelo Mello |
author_facet |
Zavaski, Marcelo Mello |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Sabino, Rafael Giordani |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zavaski, Marcelo Mello |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Direito processual penal Direito penal Colaboração premiada Crime organizado |
topic |
Direito processual penal Direito penal Colaboração premiada Crime organizado |
description |
The institute of award-winning collaboration, currently established in Brazil through Law no 12,850 / 2013, is a historical landmark for combating organized crime, providing a means to help solve the great problem that affects our country, which are crimes committed by criminal organizations, so difficult to investigate. However, there are several discussions on the ethics and constitutionality of the negotiations conducted by the Public Prosecutor's Office, together with the police officer and the accused. Thus, the objective of the present research is to analyze if the institute of the awarded collaboration and its peculiarities in the light of Law nº 12.850 / 2013 end up violating the principle of the impartiality of the judge. For that, a bibliographic and documentary research was carried out, starting from an inductive analysis, with qualitative approach and the exploratory level, using the bibliographic and documentary file as instrument for data collection, considering that the present research was based in national legislation, in doctrines, scientific articles and jurisprudence. From the results obtained, it was concluded that despite being criticized for a good part of the doctrine, the institute of the awarded collaboration is constitutional and ethical, since, once the procedures of the competent legislation have been respected, the acts carried out in the negotiations of the agreement are not vitiated by vices tending to cause nullity or any prejudice to the evidence obtained through the Institute, even though the elements raised through collaboration alone are not sufficient to sustain a conviction. Thus, if the magistrate complies with the limits set forth in the law, not participating directly in the negotiations and only approving the agreement, acting as a prosecutor of the legality, voluntariness and regularity of the collaboration, his acts do not prejudice his impartiality. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-07-05T20:25:20Z 2019-07-05T20:25:20Z 2019 2020-11-27T03:08:56Z 2020-11-27T03:08:56Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
format |
bachelorThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5895 |
url |
https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5895 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Direito - Tubarão |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
67 f. application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Tubarão |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) instname:Ânima Educação instacron:Ânima |
instname_str |
Ânima Educação |
instacron_str |
Ânima |
institution |
Ânima |
reponame_str |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
collection |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
contato@animaeducacao.com.br |
_version_ |
1767415817718202368 |