Precedente à brasileira: análise à classificação do art. 927 do Novo Código de Processo Civil como sistema de precedentes commonlista

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Deobrandino, Larissa Fernandes
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5602
Resumo: The present monographic work has as scope to analyze the classification of art. 927 of the Code of Civil Procedure as a precedent system implemented in the Brazilian judiciary, in addition to the possible transfer of the common law legal system to Brazilian law. The method used in this work was the deductive and comparative procedure method. The present research, regarding the level, was classified as exploratory. and regarding the procedure, the bibliographic. From the research, it was found that the New Code of Civil Procedure established institutes different from those provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure of 1973 in relation to the intention to standardize the jurisprudence of the courts, as well as to maintain it stable, complete and coherent. To that end, the legislator listed in the subsections of art. 927 of the CPC a series of species of legally binding decisions that should be observed by other courts and judges. With the advent, a part of the homeland doctrine operates under the understanding that said article has implemented a true system of precedents in our legal environment, which is challenged by the other fraction of doctrinators who do not interpret art. 927 of the NCPC as a system of precedents, nor do they believe in the standardization of Brazilian law. In addition, the peculiarities related to the alleged jurisprudential uniformity have been demonstrated through the linkage of certain pronouncements of the Superior Courts and their controversies. It follows, therefore, that this institute reinforced by the New Code of Civil Procedure, can not be equated with the genuine system of commonlista precedents because it has taken on a proper feature in our legal system.
id Ânima_d20b44e87017b444c27b6ab5d252f002
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/5602
network_acronym_str Ânima
network_name_str Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
repository_id_str
spelling Precedente à brasileira: análise à classificação do art. 927 do Novo Código de Processo Civil como sistema de precedentes commonlistaCivil lawCommon lawPrecedente judicialVinculaçãoThe present monographic work has as scope to analyze the classification of art. 927 of the Code of Civil Procedure as a precedent system implemented in the Brazilian judiciary, in addition to the possible transfer of the common law legal system to Brazilian law. The method used in this work was the deductive and comparative procedure method. The present research, regarding the level, was classified as exploratory. and regarding the procedure, the bibliographic. From the research, it was found that the New Code of Civil Procedure established institutes different from those provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure of 1973 in relation to the intention to standardize the jurisprudence of the courts, as well as to maintain it stable, complete and coherent. To that end, the legislator listed in the subsections of art. 927 of the CPC a series of species of legally binding decisions that should be observed by other courts and judges. With the advent, a part of the homeland doctrine operates under the understanding that said article has implemented a true system of precedents in our legal environment, which is challenged by the other fraction of doctrinators who do not interpret art. 927 of the NCPC as a system of precedents, nor do they believe in the standardization of Brazilian law. In addition, the peculiarities related to the alleged jurisprudential uniformity have been demonstrated through the linkage of certain pronouncements of the Superior Courts and their controversies. It follows, therefore, that this institute reinforced by the New Code of Civil Procedure, can not be equated with the genuine system of commonlista precedents because it has taken on a proper feature in our legal system.O presente trabalho monográfico possui como escopo analisar a classificação do art. 927 do Código de Processo Civil como sistema de precedentes implementado no judiciário brasileiro, além do possível traslado do sistema jurídico common law para o direito brasileiro. O método utilizado neste trabalho foi o dedutivo e como método de procedimento o comparativo. A presente pesquisa, quanto ao nível, foi classificada como exploratória. e quanto ao procedimento, o bibliográfico. A partir da pesquisa, verificou-se que o Novo Código de Processo Civil estabeleceu institutos diferentes dos previstos no Código de Processo Civil de 1973 em relação a pretensão de uniformizar a jurisprudência dos tribunais, bem como mantê-la estável, íntegra e coerente. Para tal fim, o legislador elencou nos incisos do art. 927 do CPC uma série de espécies de decisões judiciais dotadas de eficácia vinculante e que, assim, deverão ser observadas pelos demais tribunais e juízes. Com o advento, uma parcela da doutrina pátria opera sob o entendimento de que o referido artigo implementou um verdadeiro sistema de precedentes em nosso meio jurídico, o que é contestado pela outra fração de doutrinadores que não interpretam o art. 927 do NCPC como um sistema de precedentes, tampouco acreditam na commonlização do direito brasileiro. Ademais, restou demonstrada as peculiaridades atinentes à pretensa uniformização jurisprudencial por meio da vinculação de determinados pronunciamentos dos Tribunais Superiores e suas controvérsias. Conclui-se, portanto que, este instituto reforçado pelo Novo Código de Processo Civil, não pode ser equiparado ao genuíno sistema de precedentes commonlista pois tomou feição própria em nosso ordenamento jurídico.Oliveira Júnior, Zulmar Duarte deDeobrandino, Larissa Fernandes2018-07-06T12:51:34Z2020-11-27T02:29:50Z2018-07-06T12:51:34Z2020-11-27T02:29:50Z2018info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis76 f.application/pdfhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5602Direito - TubarãoTubarão/ SCAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessporreponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)instname:Ânima Educaçãoinstacron:Ânima2020-12-01T20:32:50Zoai:repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br:ANIMA/5602Repositório InstitucionalPRIhttps://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/oai/requestcontato@animaeducacao.com.bropendoar:2020-12-01T20:32:50Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Precedente à brasileira: análise à classificação do art. 927 do Novo Código de Processo Civil como sistema de precedentes commonlista
title Precedente à brasileira: análise à classificação do art. 927 do Novo Código de Processo Civil como sistema de precedentes commonlista
spellingShingle Precedente à brasileira: análise à classificação do art. 927 do Novo Código de Processo Civil como sistema de precedentes commonlista
Deobrandino, Larissa Fernandes
Civil law
Common law
Precedente judicial
Vinculação
title_short Precedente à brasileira: análise à classificação do art. 927 do Novo Código de Processo Civil como sistema de precedentes commonlista
title_full Precedente à brasileira: análise à classificação do art. 927 do Novo Código de Processo Civil como sistema de precedentes commonlista
title_fullStr Precedente à brasileira: análise à classificação do art. 927 do Novo Código de Processo Civil como sistema de precedentes commonlista
title_full_unstemmed Precedente à brasileira: análise à classificação do art. 927 do Novo Código de Processo Civil como sistema de precedentes commonlista
title_sort Precedente à brasileira: análise à classificação do art. 927 do Novo Código de Processo Civil como sistema de precedentes commonlista
author Deobrandino, Larissa Fernandes
author_facet Deobrandino, Larissa Fernandes
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Oliveira Júnior, Zulmar Duarte de
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Deobrandino, Larissa Fernandes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Civil law
Common law
Precedente judicial
Vinculação
topic Civil law
Common law
Precedente judicial
Vinculação
description The present monographic work has as scope to analyze the classification of art. 927 of the Code of Civil Procedure as a precedent system implemented in the Brazilian judiciary, in addition to the possible transfer of the common law legal system to Brazilian law. The method used in this work was the deductive and comparative procedure method. The present research, regarding the level, was classified as exploratory. and regarding the procedure, the bibliographic. From the research, it was found that the New Code of Civil Procedure established institutes different from those provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure of 1973 in relation to the intention to standardize the jurisprudence of the courts, as well as to maintain it stable, complete and coherent. To that end, the legislator listed in the subsections of art. 927 of the CPC a series of species of legally binding decisions that should be observed by other courts and judges. With the advent, a part of the homeland doctrine operates under the understanding that said article has implemented a true system of precedents in our legal environment, which is challenged by the other fraction of doctrinators who do not interpret art. 927 of the NCPC as a system of precedents, nor do they believe in the standardization of Brazilian law. In addition, the peculiarities related to the alleged jurisprudential uniformity have been demonstrated through the linkage of certain pronouncements of the Superior Courts and their controversies. It follows, therefore, that this institute reinforced by the New Code of Civil Procedure, can not be equated with the genuine system of commonlista precedents because it has taken on a proper feature in our legal system.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-06T12:51:34Z
2018-07-06T12:51:34Z
2018
2020-11-27T02:29:50Z
2020-11-27T02:29:50Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
format bachelorThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5602
url https://repositorio.animaeducacao.com.br/handle/ANIMA/5602
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Direito - Tubarão
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 76 f.
application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Tubarão/ SC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
instname:Ânima Educação
instacron:Ânima
instname_str Ânima Educação
instacron_str Ânima
institution Ânima
reponame_str Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
collection Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Universitário da Ânima (RUNA) - Ânima Educação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contato@animaeducacao.com.br
_version_ 1767415860029292544

Registros relacionados