Efficiency of snake sampling methods in the Brazilian semiarid region

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mesquita,Paulo C.M.D.
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Passos,Daniel C., Cechin,Sonia Z.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652013000301127
Resumo: The choice of sampling methods is a crucial step in every field survey in herpetology. In countries where time and financial support are limited, the choice of the methods is critical. The methods used to sample snakes often lack objective criteria, and the traditional methods have apparently been more important when making the choice. Consequently researches using not-standardized methods are frequently found in the literature. We have compared four commonly used methods for sampling snake assemblages in a semiarid area in Brazil. We compared the efficacy of each method based on the cost-benefit regarding the number of individuals and species captured, time, and financial investment. We found that pitfall traps were the less effective method in all aspects that were evaluated and it was not complementary to the other methods in terms of abundance of species and assemblage structure. We conclude that methods can only be considered complementary if they are standardized to the objectives of the study. The use of pitfall traps in short-term surveys of the snake fauna in areas with shrubby vegetation and stony soil is not recommended.
id ABC-1_436f349385dfb14b3eac589e180a9af2
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0001-37652013000301127
network_acronym_str ABC-1
network_name_str Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Efficiency of snake sampling methods in the Brazilian semiarid regionCaatingacomparisonpitfall trapsSquamatatechniquesThe choice of sampling methods is a crucial step in every field survey in herpetology. In countries where time and financial support are limited, the choice of the methods is critical. The methods used to sample snakes often lack objective criteria, and the traditional methods have apparently been more important when making the choice. Consequently researches using not-standardized methods are frequently found in the literature. We have compared four commonly used methods for sampling snake assemblages in a semiarid area in Brazil. We compared the efficacy of each method based on the cost-benefit regarding the number of individuals and species captured, time, and financial investment. We found that pitfall traps were the less effective method in all aspects that were evaluated and it was not complementary to the other methods in terms of abundance of species and assemblage structure. We conclude that methods can only be considered complementary if they are standardized to the objectives of the study. The use of pitfall traps in short-term surveys of the snake fauna in areas with shrubby vegetation and stony soil is not recommended.Academia Brasileira de Ciências2013-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652013000301127Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências v.85 n.3 2013reponame:Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)instacron:ABC10.1590/S0001-37652013005000040info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMesquita,Paulo C.M.D.Passos,Daniel C.Cechin,Sonia Z.eng2015-10-26T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0001-37652013000301127Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/aabchttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||aabc@abc.org.br1678-26900001-3765opendoar:2015-10-26T00:00Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Efficiency of snake sampling methods in the Brazilian semiarid region
title Efficiency of snake sampling methods in the Brazilian semiarid region
spellingShingle Efficiency of snake sampling methods in the Brazilian semiarid region
Mesquita,Paulo C.M.D.
Caatinga
comparison
pitfall traps
Squamata
techniques
title_short Efficiency of snake sampling methods in the Brazilian semiarid region
title_full Efficiency of snake sampling methods in the Brazilian semiarid region
title_fullStr Efficiency of snake sampling methods in the Brazilian semiarid region
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of snake sampling methods in the Brazilian semiarid region
title_sort Efficiency of snake sampling methods in the Brazilian semiarid region
author Mesquita,Paulo C.M.D.
author_facet Mesquita,Paulo C.M.D.
Passos,Daniel C.
Cechin,Sonia Z.
author_role author
author2 Passos,Daniel C.
Cechin,Sonia Z.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mesquita,Paulo C.M.D.
Passos,Daniel C.
Cechin,Sonia Z.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Caatinga
comparison
pitfall traps
Squamata
techniques
topic Caatinga
comparison
pitfall traps
Squamata
techniques
description The choice of sampling methods is a crucial step in every field survey in herpetology. In countries where time and financial support are limited, the choice of the methods is critical. The methods used to sample snakes often lack objective criteria, and the traditional methods have apparently been more important when making the choice. Consequently researches using not-standardized methods are frequently found in the literature. We have compared four commonly used methods for sampling snake assemblages in a semiarid area in Brazil. We compared the efficacy of each method based on the cost-benefit regarding the number of individuals and species captured, time, and financial investment. We found that pitfall traps were the less effective method in all aspects that were evaluated and it was not complementary to the other methods in terms of abundance of species and assemblage structure. We conclude that methods can only be considered complementary if they are standardized to the objectives of the study. The use of pitfall traps in short-term surveys of the snake fauna in areas with shrubby vegetation and stony soil is not recommended.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652013000301127
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0001-37652013000301127
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0001-37652013005000040
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Ciências
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Ciências
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências v.85 n.3 2013
reponame:Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
instname:Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)
instacron:ABC
instname_str Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)
instacron_str ABC
institution ABC
reponame_str Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
collection Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Ciências (ABC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||aabc@abc.org.br
_version_ 1754302859527061504