Comparing different plunge cylindrical grinding cycles based on workpiece roughness and process vibration

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira,Wanderley Xavier
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Diniz,Anselmo Eduardo, Hassui,Amauri
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-58782009000200009
Resumo: Grinding is an important process used when tight dimensional accuracy and low workpiece surface roughness are demanded. Despite the fact that grinding is widely used in industry, it is not well understood. The elastic deformation, which occurs in the beginning of the cycles, makes it necessary a spark out in the end of the cycle. An alternative to this is the use of a three-phase cycle. The main objective of this work is to compare the plunge cylindrical conventional grinding cycle (with spark out) and a three-phase one in terms of workpiece surface roughness. In order to accomplish this goal, several plunge grinding of hardened AISI 4340 steel experiments were carried out using both kinds of cycles in different grinding conditions. The vibration signal of the system was acquired in order to better understand the differences between the two kinds of cycles. The main conclusion was that conventional cycle produces lower workpiece surface roughness than the three-phase one (both with the same cycle time). It happens because the elastic deformation is better released in the conventional cycle.
id ABCM-2_a2ce66f9086ff5f9d7cfa7a4d7a7762a
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1678-58782009000200009
network_acronym_str ABCM-2
network_name_str Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparing different plunge cylindrical grinding cycles based on workpiece roughness and process vibrationgrindingvibrationsurface roughnessGrinding is an important process used when tight dimensional accuracy and low workpiece surface roughness are demanded. Despite the fact that grinding is widely used in industry, it is not well understood. The elastic deformation, which occurs in the beginning of the cycles, makes it necessary a spark out in the end of the cycle. An alternative to this is the use of a three-phase cycle. The main objective of this work is to compare the plunge cylindrical conventional grinding cycle (with spark out) and a three-phase one in terms of workpiece surface roughness. In order to accomplish this goal, several plunge grinding of hardened AISI 4340 steel experiments were carried out using both kinds of cycles in different grinding conditions. The vibration signal of the system was acquired in order to better understand the differences between the two kinds of cycles. The main conclusion was that conventional cycle produces lower workpiece surface roughness than the three-phase one (both with the same cycle time). It happens because the elastic deformation is better released in the conventional cycle.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas - ABCM2009-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-58782009000200009Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering v.31 n.2 2009reponame:Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)instacron:ABCM10.1590/S1678-58782009000200009info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira,Wanderley XavierDiniz,Anselmo EduardoHassui,Amaurieng2009-08-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1678-58782009000200009Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/jbsmse/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||abcm@abcm.org.br1806-36911678-5878opendoar:2009-08-25T00:00Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparing different plunge cylindrical grinding cycles based on workpiece roughness and process vibration
title Comparing different plunge cylindrical grinding cycles based on workpiece roughness and process vibration
spellingShingle Comparing different plunge cylindrical grinding cycles based on workpiece roughness and process vibration
Pereira,Wanderley Xavier
grinding
vibration
surface roughness
title_short Comparing different plunge cylindrical grinding cycles based on workpiece roughness and process vibration
title_full Comparing different plunge cylindrical grinding cycles based on workpiece roughness and process vibration
title_fullStr Comparing different plunge cylindrical grinding cycles based on workpiece roughness and process vibration
title_full_unstemmed Comparing different plunge cylindrical grinding cycles based on workpiece roughness and process vibration
title_sort Comparing different plunge cylindrical grinding cycles based on workpiece roughness and process vibration
author Pereira,Wanderley Xavier
author_facet Pereira,Wanderley Xavier
Diniz,Anselmo Eduardo
Hassui,Amauri
author_role author
author2 Diniz,Anselmo Eduardo
Hassui,Amauri
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira,Wanderley Xavier
Diniz,Anselmo Eduardo
Hassui,Amauri
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv grinding
vibration
surface roughness
topic grinding
vibration
surface roughness
description Grinding is an important process used when tight dimensional accuracy and low workpiece surface roughness are demanded. Despite the fact that grinding is widely used in industry, it is not well understood. The elastic deformation, which occurs in the beginning of the cycles, makes it necessary a spark out in the end of the cycle. An alternative to this is the use of a three-phase cycle. The main objective of this work is to compare the plunge cylindrical conventional grinding cycle (with spark out) and a three-phase one in terms of workpiece surface roughness. In order to accomplish this goal, several plunge grinding of hardened AISI 4340 steel experiments were carried out using both kinds of cycles in different grinding conditions. The vibration signal of the system was acquired in order to better understand the differences between the two kinds of cycles. The main conclusion was that conventional cycle produces lower workpiece surface roughness than the three-phase one (both with the same cycle time). It happens because the elastic deformation is better released in the conventional cycle.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-58782009000200009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-58782009000200009
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1678-58782009000200009
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas - ABCM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas - ABCM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering v.31 n.2 2009
reponame:Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)
instacron:ABCM
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)
instacron_str ABCM
institution ABCM
reponame_str Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online)
collection Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia e Ciências Mecânicas (ABCM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||abcm@abcm.org.br
_version_ 1754734681426755584