National Intelligence Systems as Networks: Power Distribution and Organizational Risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cepik,Marco
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Möller,Gustavo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Political Science Review
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000100201
Resumo: This article compares the intelligence systems of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Three questions drive the research: How are the national intelligence systems organized? How is power distributed among organizations in each country? What are the organizational risks? By employing Network Analysis to publicly-available data on intelligence agencies, collegiate bodies, and supervising organizations, authority relations and information flows were mapped. Regarding organizational configuration, similarities were found between India and Russia, as well as between China and South Africa. Brazil differs from the four countries. As for the power distribution, in Russia, Brazil, and India intelligence is subordinated to the government, and shows more centrality in the cases of China and South Africa. Finally, Russia runs the highest risk of having an intelligence system less able to adapt to strategic circumstances, at the same time being the most resilient among the five countries. Likewise, China has the highest risk of a single actor being able to retain information, acting as a gatekeeper. Network Analysis has proved to be a useful approach to promote a comparative research program in the Intelligence Studies field.
id ABCP-1_1dd3c498896b44425220d69b6c6970c8
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-38212017000100201
network_acronym_str ABCP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Political Science Review
repository_id_str
spelling National Intelligence Systems as Networks: Power Distribution and Organizational Risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South AfricaBRICSintelligencenetwork analysispower distributionThis article compares the intelligence systems of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Three questions drive the research: How are the national intelligence systems organized? How is power distributed among organizations in each country? What are the organizational risks? By employing Network Analysis to publicly-available data on intelligence agencies, collegiate bodies, and supervising organizations, authority relations and information flows were mapped. Regarding organizational configuration, similarities were found between India and Russia, as well as between China and South Africa. Brazil differs from the four countries. As for the power distribution, in Russia, Brazil, and India intelligence is subordinated to the government, and shows more centrality in the cases of China and South Africa. Finally, Russia runs the highest risk of having an intelligence system less able to adapt to strategic circumstances, at the same time being the most resilient among the five countries. Likewise, China has the highest risk of a single actor being able to retain information, acting as a gatekeeper. Network Analysis has proved to be a useful approach to promote a comparative research program in the Intelligence Studies field.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000100201Brazilian Political Science Review v.11 n.1 2017reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-3821201700010001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCepik,MarcoMöller,Gustavoeng2017-03-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212017000100201Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2017-03-27T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv National Intelligence Systems as Networks: Power Distribution and Organizational Risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
title National Intelligence Systems as Networks: Power Distribution and Organizational Risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
spellingShingle National Intelligence Systems as Networks: Power Distribution and Organizational Risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
Cepik,Marco
BRICS
intelligence
network analysis
power distribution
title_short National Intelligence Systems as Networks: Power Distribution and Organizational Risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
title_full National Intelligence Systems as Networks: Power Distribution and Organizational Risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
title_fullStr National Intelligence Systems as Networks: Power Distribution and Organizational Risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
title_full_unstemmed National Intelligence Systems as Networks: Power Distribution and Organizational Risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
title_sort National Intelligence Systems as Networks: Power Distribution and Organizational Risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
author Cepik,Marco
author_facet Cepik,Marco
Möller,Gustavo
author_role author
author2 Möller,Gustavo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cepik,Marco
Möller,Gustavo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv BRICS
intelligence
network analysis
power distribution
topic BRICS
intelligence
network analysis
power distribution
description This article compares the intelligence systems of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Three questions drive the research: How are the national intelligence systems organized? How is power distributed among organizations in each country? What are the organizational risks? By employing Network Analysis to publicly-available data on intelligence agencies, collegiate bodies, and supervising organizations, authority relations and information flows were mapped. Regarding organizational configuration, similarities were found between India and Russia, as well as between China and South Africa. Brazil differs from the four countries. As for the power distribution, in Russia, Brazil, and India intelligence is subordinated to the government, and shows more centrality in the cases of China and South Africa. Finally, Russia runs the highest risk of having an intelligence system less able to adapt to strategic circumstances, at the same time being the most resilient among the five countries. Likewise, China has the highest risk of a single actor being able to retain information, acting as a gatekeeper. Network Analysis has proved to be a useful approach to promote a comparative research program in the Intelligence Studies field.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000100201
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000100201
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981-3821201700010001
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review v.11 n.1 2017
reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review
instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron:ABCP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron_str ABCP
institution ABCP
reponame_str Brazilian Political Science Review
collection Brazilian Political Science Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br
_version_ 1754302908156870656