Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Political Science Review |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212019000100204 |
Resumo: | This article offers an explanation for the intensity of redistributive policies from Latin American leftist governments during the so-called 'left turn'. It challenges the idea that the recent radical leftist governments are the product of region-specific characteristics. Based on theoretical models that analyze the implications of inequality in democracies and the moderating effects of different economic and institutional structures, it argues instead that the left's redistributive policies were more intense in countries where capital mobility is low and there was no pro-elite legislative veto player. To evaluate this explanation, we offer original evidence from time-series -cross-section regression models of social spending, based on data from thirteen Latin American countries over the years 2003 to 2015. The results show partial support for the explanation: there is strong evidence that social spending decreased with the ideological distance between the president and the pro-elite veto player, but only weak evidence that capital mobility attenuated this effect. |
id |
ABCP-1_4417c2d37adb5b29075c9aed6fd504ae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1981-38212019000100204 |
network_acronym_str |
ABCP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left TurnRedistributionsocial spendingcapital mobilityveto playerLatin Americaleft turnThis article offers an explanation for the intensity of redistributive policies from Latin American leftist governments during the so-called 'left turn'. It challenges the idea that the recent radical leftist governments are the product of region-specific characteristics. Based on theoretical models that analyze the implications of inequality in democracies and the moderating effects of different economic and institutional structures, it argues instead that the left's redistributive policies were more intense in countries where capital mobility is low and there was no pro-elite legislative veto player. To evaluate this explanation, we offer original evidence from time-series -cross-section regression models of social spending, based on data from thirteen Latin American countries over the years 2003 to 2015. The results show partial support for the explanation: there is strong evidence that social spending decreased with the ideological distance between the president and the pro-elite veto player, but only weak evidence that capital mobility attenuated this effect.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212019000100204Brazilian Political Science Review v.13 n.1 2019reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-3821201900010005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,FabianoAlmeida,AcirSilva,Thiago Moreira daeng2019-05-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212019000100204Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2019-05-08T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn |
title |
Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn |
spellingShingle |
Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn Santos,Fabiano Redistribution social spending capital mobility veto player Latin America left turn |
title_short |
Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn |
title_full |
Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn |
title_fullStr |
Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn |
title_full_unstemmed |
Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn |
title_sort |
Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn |
author |
Santos,Fabiano |
author_facet |
Santos,Fabiano Almeida,Acir Silva,Thiago Moreira da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Almeida,Acir Silva,Thiago Moreira da |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos,Fabiano Almeida,Acir Silva,Thiago Moreira da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Redistribution social spending capital mobility veto player Latin America left turn |
topic |
Redistribution social spending capital mobility veto player Latin America left turn |
description |
This article offers an explanation for the intensity of redistributive policies from Latin American leftist governments during the so-called 'left turn'. It challenges the idea that the recent radical leftist governments are the product of region-specific characteristics. Based on theoretical models that analyze the implications of inequality in democracies and the moderating effects of different economic and institutional structures, it argues instead that the left's redistributive policies were more intense in countries where capital mobility is low and there was no pro-elite legislative veto player. To evaluate this explanation, we offer original evidence from time-series -cross-section regression models of social spending, based on data from thirteen Latin American countries over the years 2003 to 2015. The results show partial support for the explanation: there is strong evidence that social spending decreased with the ideological distance between the president and the pro-elite veto player, but only weak evidence that capital mobility attenuated this effect. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212019000100204 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212019000100204 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1981-3821201900010005 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Political Science Review v.13 n.1 2019 reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) instacron:ABCP |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) |
instacron_str |
ABCP |
institution |
ABCP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
collection |
Brazilian Political Science Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br |
_version_ |
1754302908227125248 |