Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos,Fabiano
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Almeida,Acir, Silva,Thiago Moreira da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Political Science Review
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212019000100204
Resumo: This article offers an explanation for the intensity of redistributive policies from Latin American leftist governments during the so-called 'left turn'. It challenges the idea that the recent radical leftist governments are the product of region-specific characteristics. Based on theoretical models that analyze the implications of inequality in democracies and the moderating effects of different economic and institutional structures, it argues instead that the left's redistributive policies were more intense in countries where capital mobility is low and there was no pro-elite legislative veto player. To evaluate this explanation, we offer original evidence from time-series -cross-section regression models of social spending, based on data from thirteen Latin American countries over the years 2003 to 2015. The results show partial support for the explanation: there is strong evidence that social spending decreased with the ideological distance between the president and the pro-elite veto player, but only weak evidence that capital mobility attenuated this effect.
id ABCP-1_4417c2d37adb5b29075c9aed6fd504ae
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-38212019000100204
network_acronym_str ABCP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Political Science Review
repository_id_str
spelling Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left TurnRedistributionsocial spendingcapital mobilityveto playerLatin Americaleft turnThis article offers an explanation for the intensity of redistributive policies from Latin American leftist governments during the so-called 'left turn'. It challenges the idea that the recent radical leftist governments are the product of region-specific characteristics. Based on theoretical models that analyze the implications of inequality in democracies and the moderating effects of different economic and institutional structures, it argues instead that the left's redistributive policies were more intense in countries where capital mobility is low and there was no pro-elite legislative veto player. To evaluate this explanation, we offer original evidence from time-series -cross-section regression models of social spending, based on data from thirteen Latin American countries over the years 2003 to 2015. The results show partial support for the explanation: there is strong evidence that social spending decreased with the ideological distance between the president and the pro-elite veto player, but only weak evidence that capital mobility attenuated this effect.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212019000100204Brazilian Political Science Review v.13 n.1 2019reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-3821201900010005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,FabianoAlmeida,AcirSilva,Thiago Moreira daeng2019-05-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212019000100204Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2019-05-08T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn
title Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn
spellingShingle Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn
Santos,Fabiano
Redistribution
social spending
capital mobility
veto player
Latin America
left turn
title_short Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn
title_full Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn
title_fullStr Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn
title_full_unstemmed Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn
title_sort Capital Mobility, Veto Players, and Redistribution in Latin America During the Left Turn
author Santos,Fabiano
author_facet Santos,Fabiano
Almeida,Acir
Silva,Thiago Moreira da
author_role author
author2 Almeida,Acir
Silva,Thiago Moreira da
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos,Fabiano
Almeida,Acir
Silva,Thiago Moreira da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Redistribution
social spending
capital mobility
veto player
Latin America
left turn
topic Redistribution
social spending
capital mobility
veto player
Latin America
left turn
description This article offers an explanation for the intensity of redistributive policies from Latin American leftist governments during the so-called 'left turn'. It challenges the idea that the recent radical leftist governments are the product of region-specific characteristics. Based on theoretical models that analyze the implications of inequality in democracies and the moderating effects of different economic and institutional structures, it argues instead that the left's redistributive policies were more intense in countries where capital mobility is low and there was no pro-elite legislative veto player. To evaluate this explanation, we offer original evidence from time-series -cross-section regression models of social spending, based on data from thirteen Latin American countries over the years 2003 to 2015. The results show partial support for the explanation: there is strong evidence that social spending decreased with the ideological distance between the president and the pro-elite veto player, but only weak evidence that capital mobility attenuated this effect.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212019000100204
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212019000100204
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981-3821201900010005
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review v.13 n.1 2019
reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review
instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron:ABCP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron_str ABCP
institution ABCP
reponame_str Brazilian Political Science Review
collection Brazilian Political Science Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br
_version_ 1754302908227125248