Benjamin Constant and the Combination of the Freedom of the Ancients with that of the Moderns

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Falcão,Luís
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Political Science Review
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000200203
Resumo: The genesis of this article may be found in Benjamin Constant’s assertion, at the end of ‘The Liberty of Ancients Compared with that of Moderns’, that freedoms must be combined before they can be separated. Possible means to bring about such a union may be found in his works. First, he examines the need for action on the part of citizens and how such action could occur in modern conditions, both from the point of view of the individual and of class. The second part of the text analyzes how moral sentiment, patriotism and well-understood interests are the central components of a union that would guide both action and participation. The formal dimension of the combination of freedoms within institutions is explored, as well as the theoretical aspects of neutral republican power as contrasted with its monarchical counterpart. I conclude that, despite modern and liberal constraints, Constant does not completely abandon the republican tradition, expressed in the active life of citizen and institutions, in the fight against arbitrariness and in the defense of collective self-government by means of laws. This leads us to the observation that the neo-republican view of Constant as insensitive to participation in modernity is gravely limited.
id ABCP-1_7c49c0b43141ef25d0c56bb28d1a90e9
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-38212020000200203
network_acronym_str ABCP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Political Science Review
repository_id_str
spelling Benjamin Constant and the Combination of the Freedom of the Ancients with that of the ModernsBenjamin ConstantfreedomcitizenshipparticipationinterestThe genesis of this article may be found in Benjamin Constant’s assertion, at the end of ‘The Liberty of Ancients Compared with that of Moderns’, that freedoms must be combined before they can be separated. Possible means to bring about such a union may be found in his works. First, he examines the need for action on the part of citizens and how such action could occur in modern conditions, both from the point of view of the individual and of class. The second part of the text analyzes how moral sentiment, patriotism and well-understood interests are the central components of a union that would guide both action and participation. The formal dimension of the combination of freedoms within institutions is explored, as well as the theoretical aspects of neutral republican power as contrasted with its monarchical counterpart. I conclude that, despite modern and liberal constraints, Constant does not completely abandon the republican tradition, expressed in the active life of citizen and institutions, in the fight against arbitrariness and in the defense of collective self-government by means of laws. This leads us to the observation that the neo-republican view of Constant as insensitive to participation in modernity is gravely limited.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000200203Brazilian Political Science Review v.14 n.2 2020reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-382120200002000info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFalcão,Luíseng2020-09-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212020000200203Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2020-09-23T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Benjamin Constant and the Combination of the Freedom of the Ancients with that of the Moderns
title Benjamin Constant and the Combination of the Freedom of the Ancients with that of the Moderns
spellingShingle Benjamin Constant and the Combination of the Freedom of the Ancients with that of the Moderns
Falcão,Luís
Benjamin Constant
freedom
citizenship
participation
interest
title_short Benjamin Constant and the Combination of the Freedom of the Ancients with that of the Moderns
title_full Benjamin Constant and the Combination of the Freedom of the Ancients with that of the Moderns
title_fullStr Benjamin Constant and the Combination of the Freedom of the Ancients with that of the Moderns
title_full_unstemmed Benjamin Constant and the Combination of the Freedom of the Ancients with that of the Moderns
title_sort Benjamin Constant and the Combination of the Freedom of the Ancients with that of the Moderns
author Falcão,Luís
author_facet Falcão,Luís
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Falcão,Luís
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Benjamin Constant
freedom
citizenship
participation
interest
topic Benjamin Constant
freedom
citizenship
participation
interest
description The genesis of this article may be found in Benjamin Constant’s assertion, at the end of ‘The Liberty of Ancients Compared with that of Moderns’, that freedoms must be combined before they can be separated. Possible means to bring about such a union may be found in his works. First, he examines the need for action on the part of citizens and how such action could occur in modern conditions, both from the point of view of the individual and of class. The second part of the text analyzes how moral sentiment, patriotism and well-understood interests are the central components of a union that would guide both action and participation. The formal dimension of the combination of freedoms within institutions is explored, as well as the theoretical aspects of neutral republican power as contrasted with its monarchical counterpart. I conclude that, despite modern and liberal constraints, Constant does not completely abandon the republican tradition, expressed in the active life of citizen and institutions, in the fight against arbitrariness and in the defense of collective self-government by means of laws. This leads us to the observation that the neo-republican view of Constant as insensitive to participation in modernity is gravely limited.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000200203
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212020000200203
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981-382120200002000
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review v.14 n.2 2020
reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review
instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron:ABCP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron_str ABCP
institution ABCP
reponame_str Brazilian Political Science Review
collection Brazilian Political Science Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br
_version_ 1754302908269068288