Why has Participatory Budgeting Declined in Brazil?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bezerra,Carla de Paiva
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Junqueira,Murilo de Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Political Science Review
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212022000200202
Resumo: Participatory Budgeting (PB) is a democratic policy innovation created in Brazil in the early 1990s, recognized worldwide as an effective policy tool for directly involving the population in budget decisions. Its diffusion in Brazil was strongly stimulated by the Workers' Party (Partido dos Trabalhadores - PT) as a showcase of the ‘Petista Way of Governing’. However, after the party took the presidential office, PB lost its status as a top participatory policy. Without its leading promoter, PB gradually declined in Brazil. What explains such a drastic change in PT’s policy preference? What are the possible explanations for the retrenchment of PB? We argue that gradual changes in fiscal laws have led to lower investment and tighter local budgets, reducing the effectiveness of PB and discouraging further adoption of this policy, thus resulting in its decline in Brazil. The shift in PT’s policy preference is therefore explained by the fact that the party adapted to the context of increasing budgetary rigidity. Using panel data analysis, we found that both the adoption and the continuity of PB at the local level between 1996 and 2016 are strongly correlated with budget and investment, a finding that supports our initial hypothesis.
id ABCP-1_e68ebed5d296a3690a71073fab4aea4e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-38212022000200202
network_acronym_str ABCP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Political Science Review
repository_id_str
spelling Why has Participatory Budgeting Declined in Brazil?Participatory budgetingpolicy failurelocal politicsfiscal policyparticipationParticipatory Budgeting (PB) is a democratic policy innovation created in Brazil in the early 1990s, recognized worldwide as an effective policy tool for directly involving the population in budget decisions. Its diffusion in Brazil was strongly stimulated by the Workers' Party (Partido dos Trabalhadores - PT) as a showcase of the ‘Petista Way of Governing’. However, after the party took the presidential office, PB lost its status as a top participatory policy. Without its leading promoter, PB gradually declined in Brazil. What explains such a drastic change in PT’s policy preference? What are the possible explanations for the retrenchment of PB? We argue that gradual changes in fiscal laws have led to lower investment and tighter local budgets, reducing the effectiveness of PB and discouraging further adoption of this policy, thus resulting in its decline in Brazil. The shift in PT’s policy preference is therefore explained by the fact that the party adapted to the context of increasing budgetary rigidity. Using panel data analysis, we found that both the adoption and the continuity of PB at the local level between 1996 and 2016 are strongly correlated with budget and investment, a finding that supports our initial hypothesis.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212022000200202Brazilian Political Science Review v.16 n.2 2022reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-3821202200020001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBezerra,Carla de PaivaJunqueira,Murilo de Oliveiraeng2022-05-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212022000200202Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2022-05-04T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why has Participatory Budgeting Declined in Brazil?
title Why has Participatory Budgeting Declined in Brazil?
spellingShingle Why has Participatory Budgeting Declined in Brazil?
Bezerra,Carla de Paiva
Participatory budgeting
policy failure
local politics
fiscal policy
participation
title_short Why has Participatory Budgeting Declined in Brazil?
title_full Why has Participatory Budgeting Declined in Brazil?
title_fullStr Why has Participatory Budgeting Declined in Brazil?
title_full_unstemmed Why has Participatory Budgeting Declined in Brazil?
title_sort Why has Participatory Budgeting Declined in Brazil?
author Bezerra,Carla de Paiva
author_facet Bezerra,Carla de Paiva
Junqueira,Murilo de Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Junqueira,Murilo de Oliveira
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bezerra,Carla de Paiva
Junqueira,Murilo de Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Participatory budgeting
policy failure
local politics
fiscal policy
participation
topic Participatory budgeting
policy failure
local politics
fiscal policy
participation
description Participatory Budgeting (PB) is a democratic policy innovation created in Brazil in the early 1990s, recognized worldwide as an effective policy tool for directly involving the population in budget decisions. Its diffusion in Brazil was strongly stimulated by the Workers' Party (Partido dos Trabalhadores - PT) as a showcase of the ‘Petista Way of Governing’. However, after the party took the presidential office, PB lost its status as a top participatory policy. Without its leading promoter, PB gradually declined in Brazil. What explains such a drastic change in PT’s policy preference? What are the possible explanations for the retrenchment of PB? We argue that gradual changes in fiscal laws have led to lower investment and tighter local budgets, reducing the effectiveness of PB and discouraging further adoption of this policy, thus resulting in its decline in Brazil. The shift in PT’s policy preference is therefore explained by the fact that the party adapted to the context of increasing budgetary rigidity. Using panel data analysis, we found that both the adoption and the continuity of PB at the local level between 1996 and 2016 are strongly correlated with budget and investment, a finding that supports our initial hypothesis.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212022000200202
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212022000200202
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981-3821202200020001
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review v.16 n.2 2022
reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review
instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron:ABCP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron_str ABCP
institution ABCP
reponame_str Brazilian Political Science Review
collection Brazilian Political Science Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br
_version_ 1754302908414820352