(In) stability, a key element to understand participatory budgeting: Discussing Portuguese cases

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Mariana Lopes
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Allegretti, Giovanni
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/41025
Resumo: Much has been said about Participatory Budgeting. Still, how to make it a successful and long-lasting experience remains open for debate. Studies have advanced in analyzing many PB “features”, discussing its capacity to promote transparency, empowerment and accountability. However, little was said about its capacity to maintain continuity over time. With the increasing number of experiences all over the world we can observe that not always the numeric growth represent the emergency of strong and stable experiences. Many Participatory Budgeting experiences are implemented but after a short time disappear from the local political agenda. In this paper we analyze the Portuguese Participatory Budgeting panorama discussing the phenomenon of fragility and volatility that many PB have faced in this country. We argue that the explanatory power of some apparently important variables, such as ruling party change, is very limited. Finally, based on the empirical discussion we propose an analytical model that may help to understand the dynamics of this phenomenon in Portugal and other countries. We think that identifying “fragility” points is an important step for enhancing Participatory Budgeting experiences.
id RCAP_c9c022b98d054a8f5bff3683abc933e9
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/41025
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling (In) stability, a key element to understand participatory budgeting: Discussing Portuguese casesParticipatory BudgetingDemocratic InnovationsPolicy stabilityMuch has been said about Participatory Budgeting. Still, how to make it a successful and long-lasting experience remains open for debate. Studies have advanced in analyzing many PB “features”, discussing its capacity to promote transparency, empowerment and accountability. However, little was said about its capacity to maintain continuity over time. With the increasing number of experiences all over the world we can observe that not always the numeric growth represent the emergency of strong and stable experiences. Many Participatory Budgeting experiences are implemented but after a short time disappear from the local political agenda. In this paper we analyze the Portuguese Participatory Budgeting panorama discussing the phenomenon of fragility and volatility that many PB have faced in this country. We argue that the explanatory power of some apparently important variables, such as ruling party change, is very limited. Finally, based on the empirical discussion we propose an analytical model that may help to understand the dynamics of this phenomenon in Portugal and other countries. We think that identifying “fragility” points is an important step for enhancing Participatory Budgeting experiences.Berkeley Electronic Press2012info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/41025http://hdl.handle.net/10316/41025eng1937-2841http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol8/iss2/art3/Alves, Mariana LopesAllegretti, Giovanniinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2020-05-25T06:08:57Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/41025Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:50:38.544210Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv (In) stability, a key element to understand participatory budgeting: Discussing Portuguese cases
title (In) stability, a key element to understand participatory budgeting: Discussing Portuguese cases
spellingShingle (In) stability, a key element to understand participatory budgeting: Discussing Portuguese cases
Alves, Mariana Lopes
Participatory Budgeting
Democratic Innovations
Policy stability
title_short (In) stability, a key element to understand participatory budgeting: Discussing Portuguese cases
title_full (In) stability, a key element to understand participatory budgeting: Discussing Portuguese cases
title_fullStr (In) stability, a key element to understand participatory budgeting: Discussing Portuguese cases
title_full_unstemmed (In) stability, a key element to understand participatory budgeting: Discussing Portuguese cases
title_sort (In) stability, a key element to understand participatory budgeting: Discussing Portuguese cases
author Alves, Mariana Lopes
author_facet Alves, Mariana Lopes
Allegretti, Giovanni
author_role author
author2 Allegretti, Giovanni
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Mariana Lopes
Allegretti, Giovanni
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Participatory Budgeting
Democratic Innovations
Policy stability
topic Participatory Budgeting
Democratic Innovations
Policy stability
description Much has been said about Participatory Budgeting. Still, how to make it a successful and long-lasting experience remains open for debate. Studies have advanced in analyzing many PB “features”, discussing its capacity to promote transparency, empowerment and accountability. However, little was said about its capacity to maintain continuity over time. With the increasing number of experiences all over the world we can observe that not always the numeric growth represent the emergency of strong and stable experiences. Many Participatory Budgeting experiences are implemented but after a short time disappear from the local political agenda. In this paper we analyze the Portuguese Participatory Budgeting panorama discussing the phenomenon of fragility and volatility that many PB have faced in this country. We argue that the explanatory power of some apparently important variables, such as ruling party change, is very limited. Finally, based on the empirical discussion we propose an analytical model that may help to understand the dynamics of this phenomenon in Portugal and other countries. We think that identifying “fragility” points is an important step for enhancing Participatory Budgeting experiences.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/41025
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/41025
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/41025
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1937-2841
http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol8/iss2/art3/
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Berkeley Electronic Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Berkeley Electronic Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133787692466176