Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in patients with myocardial infarction: a diagnostic performance study of pre-percutaneous coronary interventions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2020001000603 |
Resumo: | Accurate coronary measurements are important in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. Intravascular ultrasound is a widely accepted diagnostic modality for coronary measurement before percutaneous coronary intervention. The spatial resolution of optical coherence tomography is 10 times larger than that of intravascular ultrasound. The objective of the study was to compare quantitative and qualitative parameters of frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FDOCT) with those of intravascular ultrasound and coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Diagnostic parameters of coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and FDOCT of 250 patients with coronary artery disease who required admission diagnosis were included in the analyses. Minimum lumen diameter detected by FDOCT was larger than that detected by quantitative coronary angiography (2.11±0.1 vs 1.89±0.09 mm, P<0.0001, q=34.67) but smaller than that detected by intravascular ultrasound (2.11±0.1 vs 2.19±0.11 mm, P<0.0001, q=12.61). Minimum lumen area detected by FDOCT was smaller than that detected by intravascular ultrasound (3.41±0.01 vs 3.69±0.01 mm2, P<0.0001). FDOCT detected higher numbers of thrombus, tissue protrusion, dissection, and incomplete stent apposition than those detected by intravascular ultrasound (P<0.0001 for all). More accurate and sensitive results of the coronary lumen can be detected by FDOCT than coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (level of evidence: III). |
id |
ABDC-1_7e42a2f0649871ae354a9db0415d22b1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-879X2020001000603 |
network_acronym_str |
ABDC-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in patients with myocardial infarction: a diagnostic performance study of pre-percutaneous coronary interventionsFrequency domain optical coherence tomographyIntravascular ultrasoundMyocardial infarctionPercutaneous coronary interventionQuantitative coronary angiographyAccurate coronary measurements are important in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. Intravascular ultrasound is a widely accepted diagnostic modality for coronary measurement before percutaneous coronary intervention. The spatial resolution of optical coherence tomography is 10 times larger than that of intravascular ultrasound. The objective of the study was to compare quantitative and qualitative parameters of frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FDOCT) with those of intravascular ultrasound and coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Diagnostic parameters of coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and FDOCT of 250 patients with coronary artery disease who required admission diagnosis were included in the analyses. Minimum lumen diameter detected by FDOCT was larger than that detected by quantitative coronary angiography (2.11±0.1 vs 1.89±0.09 mm, P<0.0001, q=34.67) but smaller than that detected by intravascular ultrasound (2.11±0.1 vs 2.19±0.11 mm, P<0.0001, q=12.61). Minimum lumen area detected by FDOCT was smaller than that detected by intravascular ultrasound (3.41±0.01 vs 3.69±0.01 mm2, P<0.0001). FDOCT detected higher numbers of thrombus, tissue protrusion, dissection, and incomplete stent apposition than those detected by intravascular ultrasound (P<0.0001 for all). More accurate and sensitive results of the coronary lumen can be detected by FDOCT than coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (level of evidence: III).Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2020001000603Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.53 n.10 2020reponame:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Researchinstname:Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)instacron:ABDC10.1590/1414-431x20209776info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNiu,ZongbaoLv,XiaolanZhang,JianhuaBao,Tianpingeng2020-08-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-879X2020001000603Revistahttps://www.bjournal.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjournal@terra.com.br||bjournal@terra.com.br1414-431X0100-879Xopendoar:2020-08-13T00:00Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research - Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in patients with myocardial infarction: a diagnostic performance study of pre-percutaneous coronary interventions |
title |
Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in patients with myocardial infarction: a diagnostic performance study of pre-percutaneous coronary interventions |
spellingShingle |
Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in patients with myocardial infarction: a diagnostic performance study of pre-percutaneous coronary interventions Niu,Zongbao Frequency domain optical coherence tomography Intravascular ultrasound Myocardial infarction Percutaneous coronary intervention Quantitative coronary angiography |
title_short |
Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in patients with myocardial infarction: a diagnostic performance study of pre-percutaneous coronary interventions |
title_full |
Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in patients with myocardial infarction: a diagnostic performance study of pre-percutaneous coronary interventions |
title_fullStr |
Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in patients with myocardial infarction: a diagnostic performance study of pre-percutaneous coronary interventions |
title_full_unstemmed |
Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in patients with myocardial infarction: a diagnostic performance study of pre-percutaneous coronary interventions |
title_sort |
Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound in patients with myocardial infarction: a diagnostic performance study of pre-percutaneous coronary interventions |
author |
Niu,Zongbao |
author_facet |
Niu,Zongbao Lv,Xiaolan Zhang,Jianhua Bao,Tianping |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lv,Xiaolan Zhang,Jianhua Bao,Tianping |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Niu,Zongbao Lv,Xiaolan Zhang,Jianhua Bao,Tianping |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Frequency domain optical coherence tomography Intravascular ultrasound Myocardial infarction Percutaneous coronary intervention Quantitative coronary angiography |
topic |
Frequency domain optical coherence tomography Intravascular ultrasound Myocardial infarction Percutaneous coronary intervention Quantitative coronary angiography |
description |
Accurate coronary measurements are important in guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. Intravascular ultrasound is a widely accepted diagnostic modality for coronary measurement before percutaneous coronary intervention. The spatial resolution of optical coherence tomography is 10 times larger than that of intravascular ultrasound. The objective of the study was to compare quantitative and qualitative parameters of frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FDOCT) with those of intravascular ultrasound and coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Diagnostic parameters of coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and FDOCT of 250 patients with coronary artery disease who required admission diagnosis were included in the analyses. Minimum lumen diameter detected by FDOCT was larger than that detected by quantitative coronary angiography (2.11±0.1 vs 1.89±0.09 mm, P<0.0001, q=34.67) but smaller than that detected by intravascular ultrasound (2.11±0.1 vs 2.19±0.11 mm, P<0.0001, q=12.61). Minimum lumen area detected by FDOCT was smaller than that detected by intravascular ultrasound (3.41±0.01 vs 3.69±0.01 mm2, P<0.0001). FDOCT detected higher numbers of thrombus, tissue protrusion, dissection, and incomplete stent apposition than those detected by intravascular ultrasound (P<0.0001 for all). More accurate and sensitive results of the coronary lumen can be detected by FDOCT than coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (level of evidence: III). |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2020001000603 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2020001000603 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1414-431x20209776 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.53 n.10 2020 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research instname:Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC) instacron:ABDC |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC) |
instacron_str |
ABDC |
institution |
ABDC |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research - Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjournal@terra.com.br||bjournal@terra.com.br |
_version_ |
1754302947960815616 |