Preservation of graft function in low-risk living kidney transplant recipients treated with a combination of sirolimus and cyclosporine

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Machado,P.G.P.
Data de Publicação: 2004
Outros Autores: Felipe,C.R., Park,S.I., Garcia,R., Moreira,S., Casarini,D., Franco,M., Alfieri,F., Tedesco-Silva Jr.,H., Medina-Pestana,J.O.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2004000900004
Resumo: The use of sirolimus (SRL) in combination with full doses of cyclosporin A (CsA) results in reduced one-year kidney allograft function, which is associated with shorter long-term allograft survival. We determined the effect of reduced CsA exposure on graft function in patients receiving SRL and prednisone. Ninety recipients of living kidney transplants receiving SRL (2 mg/day, po) were compared to 35 recipients receiving azathioprine (AZA, 2 mg kg-1 day-1, po). All patients also received CsA (8-10 mg kg-1 day-1, po) and prednisone (0.5 mg kg-1 day-1). Efficacy end-point was a composite of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death at one year. Graft function was measured by creatinine, creatinine clearance, and graft function deterioration between 3 and 12 months (delta1/Cr). CsA concentrations in patients receiving SRL were 26% lower. No differences in one-year composite efficacy end-point were observed comparing SRL and AZA groups (18 vs 20%) or in the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (14.4 and 14.3%). There were no differences in mean ± SD creatinine (1.65 ± 0.46 vs 1.60 ± 0.43 mg/dl, P = 0.48) or calculated creatinine clearances (61 ± 15 vs 62 ± 13 ml/min, P = 0.58) at one year. Mean ± SD delta1/Cr (-11 ± 17 vs -14 ± 15%, P = 0.7) or the percentage of patients with >20% (26 vs 31%, P = 0.6) or >30% delta1/Cr (19 vs 17%, P = 1) did not differ between the two groups. The use of 2-mg fixed oral doses of SRL and reduced CsA exposure was effective in preventing acute rejection and preserving allograft function.
id ABDC-1_e83e6ac674fe1e690365cfe0b68a1baf
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-879X2004000900004
network_acronym_str ABDC-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
repository_id_str
spelling Preservation of graft function in low-risk living kidney transplant recipients treated with a combination of sirolimus and cyclosporineSirolimusCyclosporineGraft functionImmunosuppressionKidney transplantationThe use of sirolimus (SRL) in combination with full doses of cyclosporin A (CsA) results in reduced one-year kidney allograft function, which is associated with shorter long-term allograft survival. We determined the effect of reduced CsA exposure on graft function in patients receiving SRL and prednisone. Ninety recipients of living kidney transplants receiving SRL (2 mg/day, po) were compared to 35 recipients receiving azathioprine (AZA, 2 mg kg-1 day-1, po). All patients also received CsA (8-10 mg kg-1 day-1, po) and prednisone (0.5 mg kg-1 day-1). Efficacy end-point was a composite of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death at one year. Graft function was measured by creatinine, creatinine clearance, and graft function deterioration between 3 and 12 months (delta1/Cr). CsA concentrations in patients receiving SRL were 26% lower. No differences in one-year composite efficacy end-point were observed comparing SRL and AZA groups (18 vs 20%) or in the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (14.4 and 14.3%). There were no differences in mean ± SD creatinine (1.65 ± 0.46 vs 1.60 ± 0.43 mg/dl, P = 0.48) or calculated creatinine clearances (61 ± 15 vs 62 ± 13 ml/min, P = 0.58) at one year. Mean ± SD delta1/Cr (-11 ± 17 vs -14 ± 15%, P = 0.7) or the percentage of patients with >20% (26 vs 31%, P = 0.6) or >30% delta1/Cr (19 vs 17%, P = 1) did not differ between the two groups. The use of 2-mg fixed oral doses of SRL and reduced CsA exposure was effective in preventing acute rejection and preserving allograft function.Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica2004-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2004000900004Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.37 n.9 2004reponame:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Researchinstname:Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)instacron:ABDC10.1590/S0100-879X2004000900004info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMachado,P.G.P.Felipe,C.R.Park,S.I.Garcia,R.Moreira,S.Casarini,D.Franco,M.Alfieri,F.Tedesco-Silva Jr.,H.Medina-Pestana,J.O.eng2004-09-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-879X2004000900004Revistahttps://www.bjournal.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjournal@terra.com.br||bjournal@terra.com.br1414-431X0100-879Xopendoar:2004-09-16T00:00Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research - Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Preservation of graft function in low-risk living kidney transplant recipients treated with a combination of sirolimus and cyclosporine
title Preservation of graft function in low-risk living kidney transplant recipients treated with a combination of sirolimus and cyclosporine
spellingShingle Preservation of graft function in low-risk living kidney transplant recipients treated with a combination of sirolimus and cyclosporine
Machado,P.G.P.
Sirolimus
Cyclosporine
Graft function
Immunosuppression
Kidney transplantation
title_short Preservation of graft function in low-risk living kidney transplant recipients treated with a combination of sirolimus and cyclosporine
title_full Preservation of graft function in low-risk living kidney transplant recipients treated with a combination of sirolimus and cyclosporine
title_fullStr Preservation of graft function in low-risk living kidney transplant recipients treated with a combination of sirolimus and cyclosporine
title_full_unstemmed Preservation of graft function in low-risk living kidney transplant recipients treated with a combination of sirolimus and cyclosporine
title_sort Preservation of graft function in low-risk living kidney transplant recipients treated with a combination of sirolimus and cyclosporine
author Machado,P.G.P.
author_facet Machado,P.G.P.
Felipe,C.R.
Park,S.I.
Garcia,R.
Moreira,S.
Casarini,D.
Franco,M.
Alfieri,F.
Tedesco-Silva Jr.,H.
Medina-Pestana,J.O.
author_role author
author2 Felipe,C.R.
Park,S.I.
Garcia,R.
Moreira,S.
Casarini,D.
Franco,M.
Alfieri,F.
Tedesco-Silva Jr.,H.
Medina-Pestana,J.O.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Machado,P.G.P.
Felipe,C.R.
Park,S.I.
Garcia,R.
Moreira,S.
Casarini,D.
Franco,M.
Alfieri,F.
Tedesco-Silva Jr.,H.
Medina-Pestana,J.O.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sirolimus
Cyclosporine
Graft function
Immunosuppression
Kidney transplantation
topic Sirolimus
Cyclosporine
Graft function
Immunosuppression
Kidney transplantation
description The use of sirolimus (SRL) in combination with full doses of cyclosporin A (CsA) results in reduced one-year kidney allograft function, which is associated with shorter long-term allograft survival. We determined the effect of reduced CsA exposure on graft function in patients receiving SRL and prednisone. Ninety recipients of living kidney transplants receiving SRL (2 mg/day, po) were compared to 35 recipients receiving azathioprine (AZA, 2 mg kg-1 day-1, po). All patients also received CsA (8-10 mg kg-1 day-1, po) and prednisone (0.5 mg kg-1 day-1). Efficacy end-point was a composite of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss, or death at one year. Graft function was measured by creatinine, creatinine clearance, and graft function deterioration between 3 and 12 months (delta1/Cr). CsA concentrations in patients receiving SRL were 26% lower. No differences in one-year composite efficacy end-point were observed comparing SRL and AZA groups (18 vs 20%) or in the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (14.4 and 14.3%). There were no differences in mean ± SD creatinine (1.65 ± 0.46 vs 1.60 ± 0.43 mg/dl, P = 0.48) or calculated creatinine clearances (61 ± 15 vs 62 ± 13 ml/min, P = 0.58) at one year. Mean ± SD delta1/Cr (-11 ± 17 vs -14 ± 15%, P = 0.7) or the percentage of patients with >20% (26 vs 31%, P = 0.6) or >30% delta1/Cr (19 vs 17%, P = 1) did not differ between the two groups. The use of 2-mg fixed oral doses of SRL and reduced CsA exposure was effective in preventing acute rejection and preserving allograft function.
publishDate 2004
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2004-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2004000900004
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2004000900004
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-879X2004000900004
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.37 n.9 2004
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
instname:Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)
instacron:ABDC
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)
instacron_str ABDC
institution ABDC
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
collection Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research - Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjournal@terra.com.br||bjournal@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754302933333180416