Biological evaluation of recombinant human erythropoietin in pharmaceutical products

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ramos,A.S.
Publication Date: 2003
Other Authors: Schmidt,C.A., Andrade,S.S., Fronza,M., Rafferty,B., Dalmora,S.L.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2003001100014
Summary: The potencies of mammalian cell-derived recombinant human erythropoietin pharmaceutical preparations, from a total of five manufacturers, were assessed by in vivo bioassay using standardized protocols. Eight-week-old normocythemic mice received a single subcutaneous injection followed by blood sampling 96 h later or multiple daily injections with blood sampling 24 h after the last injection. Reticulocyte counting by microscopic examination was employed as the end-point using the brilliant cresyl blue or selective hemolysis methods, together with automated flow cytometry. Different injection schedules were investigated and dose-response curves for the European Pharmacopoeia Biological Reference Preparation of erythropoietin were compared. Manual and automated methods of reticulocyte counting were correlated with respect to assay validity and precision. Using 8 mice per treatment group, intra-assay precision determined for all of the assays in the study showed coefficients of variation of 12.1-28.4% for the brilliant cresyl blue method, 14.1-30.8% for the selective hemolysis method and 8.5-19.7% for the flow cytometry method. Applying the single injection protocol, a combination of at least two independent assays was required to achieve the precision potency and confidence limits indicated by the manufacturers, while the multiple daily injection protocol yielded the same acceptable results within a single assay. Although the latter protocol using flow cytometry for reticulocyte counting gave more precise and reproducible results (intra-assay coefficients of variation: 5.9-14.2%), the well-characterized manual methods provide equally valid alternatives for the quality control of recombinant human erythropoietin therapeutic products.
id ABDC-1_fec091db8562c622dbcc8770f56b540b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-879X2003001100014
network_acronym_str ABDC-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
repository_id_str
spelling Biological evaluation of recombinant human erythropoietin in pharmaceutical productsRecombinant human erythropoietinBioassayPolycythemiaReticulocyte countingNormocythemic miceThe potencies of mammalian cell-derived recombinant human erythropoietin pharmaceutical preparations, from a total of five manufacturers, were assessed by in vivo bioassay using standardized protocols. Eight-week-old normocythemic mice received a single subcutaneous injection followed by blood sampling 96 h later or multiple daily injections with blood sampling 24 h after the last injection. Reticulocyte counting by microscopic examination was employed as the end-point using the brilliant cresyl blue or selective hemolysis methods, together with automated flow cytometry. Different injection schedules were investigated and dose-response curves for the European Pharmacopoeia Biological Reference Preparation of erythropoietin were compared. Manual and automated methods of reticulocyte counting were correlated with respect to assay validity and precision. Using 8 mice per treatment group, intra-assay precision determined for all of the assays in the study showed coefficients of variation of 12.1-28.4% for the brilliant cresyl blue method, 14.1-30.8% for the selective hemolysis method and 8.5-19.7% for the flow cytometry method. Applying the single injection protocol, a combination of at least two independent assays was required to achieve the precision potency and confidence limits indicated by the manufacturers, while the multiple daily injection protocol yielded the same acceptable results within a single assay. Although the latter protocol using flow cytometry for reticulocyte counting gave more precise and reproducible results (intra-assay coefficients of variation: 5.9-14.2%), the well-characterized manual methods provide equally valid alternatives for the quality control of recombinant human erythropoietin therapeutic products.Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica2003-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2003001100014Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.36 n.11 2003reponame:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Researchinstname:Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)instacron:ABDC10.1590/S0100-879X2003001100014info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRamos,A.S.Schmidt,C.A.Andrade,S.S.Fronza,M.Rafferty,B.Dalmora,S.L.eng2003-10-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-879X2003001100014Revistahttps://www.bjournal.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbjournal@terra.com.br||bjournal@terra.com.br1414-431X0100-879Xopendoar:2003-10-22T00:00Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research - Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biological evaluation of recombinant human erythropoietin in pharmaceutical products
title Biological evaluation of recombinant human erythropoietin in pharmaceutical products
spellingShingle Biological evaluation of recombinant human erythropoietin in pharmaceutical products
Ramos,A.S.
Recombinant human erythropoietin
Bioassay
Polycythemia
Reticulocyte counting
Normocythemic mice
title_short Biological evaluation of recombinant human erythropoietin in pharmaceutical products
title_full Biological evaluation of recombinant human erythropoietin in pharmaceutical products
title_fullStr Biological evaluation of recombinant human erythropoietin in pharmaceutical products
title_full_unstemmed Biological evaluation of recombinant human erythropoietin in pharmaceutical products
title_sort Biological evaluation of recombinant human erythropoietin in pharmaceutical products
author Ramos,A.S.
author_facet Ramos,A.S.
Schmidt,C.A.
Andrade,S.S.
Fronza,M.
Rafferty,B.
Dalmora,S.L.
author_role author
author2 Schmidt,C.A.
Andrade,S.S.
Fronza,M.
Rafferty,B.
Dalmora,S.L.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramos,A.S.
Schmidt,C.A.
Andrade,S.S.
Fronza,M.
Rafferty,B.
Dalmora,S.L.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Recombinant human erythropoietin
Bioassay
Polycythemia
Reticulocyte counting
Normocythemic mice
topic Recombinant human erythropoietin
Bioassay
Polycythemia
Reticulocyte counting
Normocythemic mice
description The potencies of mammalian cell-derived recombinant human erythropoietin pharmaceutical preparations, from a total of five manufacturers, were assessed by in vivo bioassay using standardized protocols. Eight-week-old normocythemic mice received a single subcutaneous injection followed by blood sampling 96 h later or multiple daily injections with blood sampling 24 h after the last injection. Reticulocyte counting by microscopic examination was employed as the end-point using the brilliant cresyl blue or selective hemolysis methods, together with automated flow cytometry. Different injection schedules were investigated and dose-response curves for the European Pharmacopoeia Biological Reference Preparation of erythropoietin were compared. Manual and automated methods of reticulocyte counting were correlated with respect to assay validity and precision. Using 8 mice per treatment group, intra-assay precision determined for all of the assays in the study showed coefficients of variation of 12.1-28.4% for the brilliant cresyl blue method, 14.1-30.8% for the selective hemolysis method and 8.5-19.7% for the flow cytometry method. Applying the single injection protocol, a combination of at least two independent assays was required to achieve the precision potency and confidence limits indicated by the manufacturers, while the multiple daily injection protocol yielded the same acceptable results within a single assay. Although the latter protocol using flow cytometry for reticulocyte counting gave more precise and reproducible results (intra-assay coefficients of variation: 5.9-14.2%), the well-characterized manual methods provide equally valid alternatives for the quality control of recombinant human erythropoietin therapeutic products.
publishDate 2003
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2003-11-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2003001100014
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2003001100014
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-879X2003001100014
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v.36 n.11 2003
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
instname:Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)
instacron:ABDC
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)
instacron_str ABDC
institution ABDC
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
collection Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research - Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjournal@terra.com.br||bjournal@terra.com.br
_version_ 1754302932569817088