Clinical skills assessment and feedback in pediatric residency

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Auto,Bruna de Sá Duarte
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Vasconcelos,Maria Viviane Lisboa de, Peixoto,Ana Lydia Vasco de Albuquerque
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-55022021000200227
Resumo: Abstract: Introduction: A medical residency is the specialization par excellence in medical training and the program is responsible for ensuring that the recently graduated doctor reaches the established level of competence. A well-prepared assessment system with feedback is an effective tool to enhance the performance of future specialists and guarantee their qualification. Objective: To analyze the assessment system for pediatric residents at a university hospital, aiming to promote teaching training in assessment methods. Methodology: educational action research (research-teaching), conducted with teachers and preceptors in the pediatric residency of a university hospital. The stages consisted of: a) the application of a questionnaire on participant profile and assessment methods used to evaluate the medical residents; b) intervention (workshop) on the assessment of clinical skills and feedback; c) immediate assessment after the workshop, by applying another questionnaire based on level 1 of the Kirkpatrick model. Simple statistical analysis was used for the objective data and the content analysis, according to recommendations by Malheiros (2011) and Bardin (2013), for the qualitative part. Result: Ten (48%) of the 21 participants declared not being formally trained in assessment and that they applied the more traditional methods learned from personal experience. Regarding the assessment methods, 81% (17/21) of the participants used more than one, aiming to obtain a more encompassing and reliable assessment. However, none of the teachers/preceptors used a systematized assessment of the clinical skills or provided feedback to the medical residents. After the workshop, with a focus on assessing performance in a simulated ‘Objective Structured Clinical Examination’ (OSCE) environment, all the participants were favorable to apply the OSCE in their teaching-learning practice with residents and undergraduate students, reaching Kirkpatrick level 3. Conclusion: The action research helped identify limitations in the assessment and feedback system of the pediatric resident physician. The methodology used revealed an aggregating effect and contributed to the development of the collaborative and integrative sense in the group. However, it was not enough to positively interfere with the pediatric medical residency assessment in the short term.
id ABEM-1_6f83b2df176f783f8851b29f3ada98d1
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-55022021000200227
network_acronym_str ABEM-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Clinical skills assessment and feedback in pediatric residencyMedical ResidencyFormative FeedbackTeacher TrainingPerformance AssessmentAbstract: Introduction: A medical residency is the specialization par excellence in medical training and the program is responsible for ensuring that the recently graduated doctor reaches the established level of competence. A well-prepared assessment system with feedback is an effective tool to enhance the performance of future specialists and guarantee their qualification. Objective: To analyze the assessment system for pediatric residents at a university hospital, aiming to promote teaching training in assessment methods. Methodology: educational action research (research-teaching), conducted with teachers and preceptors in the pediatric residency of a university hospital. The stages consisted of: a) the application of a questionnaire on participant profile and assessment methods used to evaluate the medical residents; b) intervention (workshop) on the assessment of clinical skills and feedback; c) immediate assessment after the workshop, by applying another questionnaire based on level 1 of the Kirkpatrick model. Simple statistical analysis was used for the objective data and the content analysis, according to recommendations by Malheiros (2011) and Bardin (2013), for the qualitative part. Result: Ten (48%) of the 21 participants declared not being formally trained in assessment and that they applied the more traditional methods learned from personal experience. Regarding the assessment methods, 81% (17/21) of the participants used more than one, aiming to obtain a more encompassing and reliable assessment. However, none of the teachers/preceptors used a systematized assessment of the clinical skills or provided feedback to the medical residents. After the workshop, with a focus on assessing performance in a simulated ‘Objective Structured Clinical Examination’ (OSCE) environment, all the participants were favorable to apply the OSCE in their teaching-learning practice with residents and undergraduate students, reaching Kirkpatrick level 3. Conclusion: The action research helped identify limitations in the assessment and feedback system of the pediatric resident physician. The methodology used revealed an aggregating effect and contributed to the development of the collaborative and integrative sense in the group. However, it was not enough to positively interfere with the pediatric medical residency assessment in the short term.Associação Brasileira de Educação Médica2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-55022021000200227Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica v.45 n.2 2021reponame:Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Educação Médica (ABEM)instacron:ABEM10.1590/1981-5271v45.2-20190340.inginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAuto,Bruna de Sá DuarteVasconcelos,Maria Viviane Lisboa dePeixoto,Ana Lydia Vasco de Albuquerqueeng2021-06-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-55022021000200227Revistahttp://www.educacaomedica.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevista@abem-educmed.org.br||revista@educacaomedica.org.br1981-52710100-5502opendoar:2021-06-15T00:00Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Educação Médica (ABEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Clinical skills assessment and feedback in pediatric residency
title Clinical skills assessment and feedback in pediatric residency
spellingShingle Clinical skills assessment and feedback in pediatric residency
Auto,Bruna de Sá Duarte
Medical Residency
Formative Feedback
Teacher Training
Performance Assessment
title_short Clinical skills assessment and feedback in pediatric residency
title_full Clinical skills assessment and feedback in pediatric residency
title_fullStr Clinical skills assessment and feedback in pediatric residency
title_full_unstemmed Clinical skills assessment and feedback in pediatric residency
title_sort Clinical skills assessment and feedback in pediatric residency
author Auto,Bruna de Sá Duarte
author_facet Auto,Bruna de Sá Duarte
Vasconcelos,Maria Viviane Lisboa de
Peixoto,Ana Lydia Vasco de Albuquerque
author_role author
author2 Vasconcelos,Maria Viviane Lisboa de
Peixoto,Ana Lydia Vasco de Albuquerque
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Auto,Bruna de Sá Duarte
Vasconcelos,Maria Viviane Lisboa de
Peixoto,Ana Lydia Vasco de Albuquerque
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Medical Residency
Formative Feedback
Teacher Training
Performance Assessment
topic Medical Residency
Formative Feedback
Teacher Training
Performance Assessment
description Abstract: Introduction: A medical residency is the specialization par excellence in medical training and the program is responsible for ensuring that the recently graduated doctor reaches the established level of competence. A well-prepared assessment system with feedback is an effective tool to enhance the performance of future specialists and guarantee their qualification. Objective: To analyze the assessment system for pediatric residents at a university hospital, aiming to promote teaching training in assessment methods. Methodology: educational action research (research-teaching), conducted with teachers and preceptors in the pediatric residency of a university hospital. The stages consisted of: a) the application of a questionnaire on participant profile and assessment methods used to evaluate the medical residents; b) intervention (workshop) on the assessment of clinical skills and feedback; c) immediate assessment after the workshop, by applying another questionnaire based on level 1 of the Kirkpatrick model. Simple statistical analysis was used for the objective data and the content analysis, according to recommendations by Malheiros (2011) and Bardin (2013), for the qualitative part. Result: Ten (48%) of the 21 participants declared not being formally trained in assessment and that they applied the more traditional methods learned from personal experience. Regarding the assessment methods, 81% (17/21) of the participants used more than one, aiming to obtain a more encompassing and reliable assessment. However, none of the teachers/preceptors used a systematized assessment of the clinical skills or provided feedback to the medical residents. After the workshop, with a focus on assessing performance in a simulated ‘Objective Structured Clinical Examination’ (OSCE) environment, all the participants were favorable to apply the OSCE in their teaching-learning practice with residents and undergraduate students, reaching Kirkpatrick level 3. Conclusion: The action research helped identify limitations in the assessment and feedback system of the pediatric resident physician. The methodology used revealed an aggregating effect and contributed to the development of the collaborative and integrative sense in the group. However, it was not enough to positively interfere with the pediatric medical residency assessment in the short term.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-55022021000200227
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-55022021000200227
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981-5271v45.2-20190340.ing
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Educação Médica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Educação Médica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica v.45 n.2 2021
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Educação Médica (ABEM)
instacron:ABEM
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Educação Médica (ABEM)
instacron_str ABEM
institution ABEM
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Educação Médica (ABEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@abem-educmed.org.br||revista@educacaomedica.org.br
_version_ 1754303008695386112