Embracement with risk classification: relationship of justice with the user

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lacerda,Andrea Stella Barbosa
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Sauthier,Marta, Paes,Graciele Oroski, Teixeira,Enéas Rangel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672019000601496
Resumo: ABSTRACT Objective: to describe the conception of justice of nurses and users regarding the Risk Classification in Emergency Unit; to analyze the conception of justice in the implementation of the Risk Classification in Emergency Unit from the user’s recognition; to discuss, from Axel Honneth’s Theory of Recognition, justice with the user in the Risk Classification in Emergency Unit. Method: qualitative research of descriptive, exploratory typology, which used action research as a method. Bardin’s Content Analysis was carried out. Results: a category was created: “Justice versus Injustice” and three subcategories: “Autonomy/Freedom versus Heteronomy/Subordination”; “Communication versus Hermeneutic Problems”; “Contributions versus Conflicts”. Final considerations: Embracement with Risk Classification presents difficulties in its interpretation and effectiveness; there are situations of disrespect that compete against the required ethics. Justice addressed by this study will be achieved by an emergency access system that meets user expectations, recognizing it as a subject of rights.
id ABEN-1_7bb6d3765fa5b9a91d50a6d4a16515a9
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-71672019000601496
network_acronym_str ABEN-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Embracement with risk classification: relationship of justice with the userUser EmbracementClassificationEmergency Service, HospitalEmergency NursingEthicsABSTRACT Objective: to describe the conception of justice of nurses and users regarding the Risk Classification in Emergency Unit; to analyze the conception of justice in the implementation of the Risk Classification in Emergency Unit from the user’s recognition; to discuss, from Axel Honneth’s Theory of Recognition, justice with the user in the Risk Classification in Emergency Unit. Method: qualitative research of descriptive, exploratory typology, which used action research as a method. Bardin’s Content Analysis was carried out. Results: a category was created: “Justice versus Injustice” and three subcategories: “Autonomy/Freedom versus Heteronomy/Subordination”; “Communication versus Hermeneutic Problems”; “Contributions versus Conflicts”. Final considerations: Embracement with Risk Classification presents difficulties in its interpretation and effectiveness; there are situations of disrespect that compete against the required ethics. Justice addressed by this study will be achieved by an emergency access system that meets user expectations, recognizing it as a subject of rights.Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem2019-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672019000601496Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.72 n.6 2019reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)instacron:ABEN10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0420info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLacerda,Andrea Stella BarbosaSauthier,MartaPaes,Graciele OroskiTeixeira,Enéas Rangeleng2019-12-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-71672019000601496Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/rebenhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpreben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br1984-04460034-7167opendoar:2019-12-10T00:00Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Embracement with risk classification: relationship of justice with the user
title Embracement with risk classification: relationship of justice with the user
spellingShingle Embracement with risk classification: relationship of justice with the user
Lacerda,Andrea Stella Barbosa
User Embracement
Classification
Emergency Service, Hospital
Emergency Nursing
Ethics
title_short Embracement with risk classification: relationship of justice with the user
title_full Embracement with risk classification: relationship of justice with the user
title_fullStr Embracement with risk classification: relationship of justice with the user
title_full_unstemmed Embracement with risk classification: relationship of justice with the user
title_sort Embracement with risk classification: relationship of justice with the user
author Lacerda,Andrea Stella Barbosa
author_facet Lacerda,Andrea Stella Barbosa
Sauthier,Marta
Paes,Graciele Oroski
Teixeira,Enéas Rangel
author_role author
author2 Sauthier,Marta
Paes,Graciele Oroski
Teixeira,Enéas Rangel
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lacerda,Andrea Stella Barbosa
Sauthier,Marta
Paes,Graciele Oroski
Teixeira,Enéas Rangel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv User Embracement
Classification
Emergency Service, Hospital
Emergency Nursing
Ethics
topic User Embracement
Classification
Emergency Service, Hospital
Emergency Nursing
Ethics
description ABSTRACT Objective: to describe the conception of justice of nurses and users regarding the Risk Classification in Emergency Unit; to analyze the conception of justice in the implementation of the Risk Classification in Emergency Unit from the user’s recognition; to discuss, from Axel Honneth’s Theory of Recognition, justice with the user in the Risk Classification in Emergency Unit. Method: qualitative research of descriptive, exploratory typology, which used action research as a method. Bardin’s Content Analysis was carried out. Results: a category was created: “Justice versus Injustice” and three subcategories: “Autonomy/Freedom versus Heteronomy/Subordination”; “Communication versus Hermeneutic Problems”; “Contributions versus Conflicts”. Final considerations: Embracement with Risk Classification presents difficulties in its interpretation and effectiveness; there are situations of disrespect that compete against the required ethics. Justice addressed by this study will be achieved by an emergency access system that meets user expectations, recognizing it as a subject of rights.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672019000601496
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-71672019000601496
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0034-7167-2018-0420
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem v.72 n.6 2019
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron:ABEN
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
instacron_str ABEN
institution ABEN
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (ABEN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv reben@abennacional.org.br||telma.garcia@abennacional.org.br|| editorreben@abennacional.org.br
_version_ 1754303036327460864

Registros relacionados