Traditional lecture versus PBL tutorials in Dental students’ knowledge acquisition
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da ABENO (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/757 |
Resumo: | Educators have currently recommended more dynamic models focused on the development of critical thinking, active learning and problem-solving. This prospective quantitative study aimed to compare the effect of two instructional formats - traditional lecture and problem-based learning (PBL) tutorials - on second-year dental students’ knowledge in oral radiology. The students were randomly allocated into two groups: control group n=64 (traditional) and experimental group n=65 (PBL), both submitted to a course of oral radiology at different times - control group in the first half of 2015 and as the experimental group in the second half of the same year. In 2016, a test containing 30 questions in oral radiology was applied for students in both groups to evaluate their learning acquisition. The questions covered three domains: general principles, radiobiology/radioprotection, and technique/interpretation. The students’ final score was compared between the two groups of teaching-learning methods by Mann-Whitney test. The significance level was set at 5% (α=0.05). The mean values of students’ final score of control and experimental groups were, respectively, 15.11 and 15.58 with no statistically significant difference between them (p>0.05). Additionally, no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was observed between both groups even when the domains were analyzed separately. In conclusion, the PBL tutorials format did not have a direct influence on knowledge acquisition for these second-year dental students in oral radiology. |
id |
ABENO-2_38912c64abdf2b9bf0c17bfbe8d309f6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revabeno.emnuvens.com.br:article/757 |
network_acronym_str |
ABENO-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista da ABENO (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Traditional lecture versus PBL tutorials in Dental students’ knowledge acquisitionMétodo tradicional versus ABP na aprendizagem de acadêmicos de OdontologiaTeaching. Learning. Problem-Based Learning. Dentistry. Radiology.Ensino. Aprendizagem. Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas. Odontologia. Radiologia.Educators have currently recommended more dynamic models focused on the development of critical thinking, active learning and problem-solving. This prospective quantitative study aimed to compare the effect of two instructional formats - traditional lecture and problem-based learning (PBL) tutorials - on second-year dental students’ knowledge in oral radiology. The students were randomly allocated into two groups: control group n=64 (traditional) and experimental group n=65 (PBL), both submitted to a course of oral radiology at different times - control group in the first half of 2015 and as the experimental group in the second half of the same year. In 2016, a test containing 30 questions in oral radiology was applied for students in both groups to evaluate their learning acquisition. The questions covered three domains: general principles, radiobiology/radioprotection, and technique/interpretation. The students’ final score was compared between the two groups of teaching-learning methods by Mann-Whitney test. The significance level was set at 5% (α=0.05). The mean values of students’ final score of control and experimental groups were, respectively, 15.11 and 15.58 with no statistically significant difference between them (p>0.05). Additionally, no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was observed between both groups even when the domains were analyzed separately. In conclusion, the PBL tutorials format did not have a direct influence on knowledge acquisition for these second-year dental students in oral radiology.Atualmente os educadores recomendam modelos mais dinâmicos focados no desenvolvimento do pensamento crítico, aprendizado ativo e solução de problemas. Este estudo quantitativo prospectivo teve como objetivo comparar o efeito de dois formatos de instrução - aulas tradicionais e aprendizagem baseada em problemas (ABP) - sobre o conhecimento de estudantes de odontologia do segundo ano em Radiologia Odontológica. Os estudantes foram alocados aleatoriamente em dois grupos: grupo controle n = 64 (tradicional) e grupo experimental n = 65 (ABP), ambos submetidos a um curso de Radiologia Odontológica em diferentes momentos - grupo controle no primeiro semestre de 2015 e como grupo experimental no segundo semestre do mesmo ano. Em 2016, um teste contendo 30 questões em radiologia oral foi aplicado para estudantes de ambos os grupos avaliarem sua aquisição de aprendizagem. As questões abrangiam três domínios: princípios gerais, radiobiologia/radioproteção e técnica/ interpretação. O escore final dos estudantes foi comparado entre os dois grupos pelo teste de Mann-Whitney. O nível de significância foi estabelecido em 5% (α = 0,05). Os valores médios do escore final dos estudantes dos grupos controle e experimental foram, respectivamente, 15,11 e 15,58, sem diferença estatisticamente significativa entre eles (p> 0,05). Além disso, não houve diferença estatisticamente significante (p> 0,05) entre os dois grupos, mesmo quando os domínios foram analisados separadamente. Em conclusão, o formato de tutoriais do ABP não teve influência direta na aquisição de conhecimento para esses estudantes. Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico2019-01-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/75710.30979/rev.abeno.v18i4.757Revista da ABENO; Vol. 18 No. 4 (2018); 76-84Revista da ABENO; Vol. 18 Núm. 4 (2018); 76-84Revista da ABENO; v. 18 n. 4 (2018); 76-842595-02741679-5954reponame:Revista da ABENO (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico (ABENO)instacron:ABENOenghttps://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/757/516Copyright (c) 2019 Revista da ABENOinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGalvão, Neiandro SantosOliveira, Matheus LimaPanzarella, Francine KühlRaitz, RicardoJunqueira, José Luiz Cintra2019-01-30T18:46:51Zoai:ojs.revabeno.emnuvens.com.br:article/757Revistahttps://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/indexONGhttps://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/oairevabeno@gmail.com2595-02741679-5954opendoar:2023-01-13T09:48:09.697376Revista da ABENO (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico (ABENO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Traditional lecture versus PBL tutorials in Dental students’ knowledge acquisition Método tradicional versus ABP na aprendizagem de acadêmicos de Odontologia |
title |
Traditional lecture versus PBL tutorials in Dental students’ knowledge acquisition |
spellingShingle |
Traditional lecture versus PBL tutorials in Dental students’ knowledge acquisition Galvão, Neiandro Santos Teaching. Learning. Problem-Based Learning. Dentistry. Radiology. Ensino. Aprendizagem. Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas. Odontologia. Radiologia. |
title_short |
Traditional lecture versus PBL tutorials in Dental students’ knowledge acquisition |
title_full |
Traditional lecture versus PBL tutorials in Dental students’ knowledge acquisition |
title_fullStr |
Traditional lecture versus PBL tutorials in Dental students’ knowledge acquisition |
title_full_unstemmed |
Traditional lecture versus PBL tutorials in Dental students’ knowledge acquisition |
title_sort |
Traditional lecture versus PBL tutorials in Dental students’ knowledge acquisition |
author |
Galvão, Neiandro Santos |
author_facet |
Galvão, Neiandro Santos Oliveira, Matheus Lima Panzarella, Francine Kühl Raitz, Ricardo Junqueira, José Luiz Cintra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Matheus Lima Panzarella, Francine Kühl Raitz, Ricardo Junqueira, José Luiz Cintra |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Galvão, Neiandro Santos Oliveira, Matheus Lima Panzarella, Francine Kühl Raitz, Ricardo Junqueira, José Luiz Cintra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Teaching. Learning. Problem-Based Learning. Dentistry. Radiology. Ensino. Aprendizagem. Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas. Odontologia. Radiologia. |
topic |
Teaching. Learning. Problem-Based Learning. Dentistry. Radiology. Ensino. Aprendizagem. Aprendizagem Baseada em Problemas. Odontologia. Radiologia. |
description |
Educators have currently recommended more dynamic models focused on the development of critical thinking, active learning and problem-solving. This prospective quantitative study aimed to compare the effect of two instructional formats - traditional lecture and problem-based learning (PBL) tutorials - on second-year dental students’ knowledge in oral radiology. The students were randomly allocated into two groups: control group n=64 (traditional) and experimental group n=65 (PBL), both submitted to a course of oral radiology at different times - control group in the first half of 2015 and as the experimental group in the second half of the same year. In 2016, a test containing 30 questions in oral radiology was applied for students in both groups to evaluate their learning acquisition. The questions covered three domains: general principles, radiobiology/radioprotection, and technique/interpretation. The students’ final score was compared between the two groups of teaching-learning methods by Mann-Whitney test. The significance level was set at 5% (α=0.05). The mean values of students’ final score of control and experimental groups were, respectively, 15.11 and 15.58 with no statistically significant difference between them (p>0.05). Additionally, no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was observed between both groups even when the domains were analyzed separately. In conclusion, the PBL tutorials format did not have a direct influence on knowledge acquisition for these second-year dental students in oral radiology. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-01-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/757 10.30979/rev.abeno.v18i4.757 |
url |
https://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/757 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.30979/rev.abeno.v18i4.757 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/757/516 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista da ABENO info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista da ABENO |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABENO; Vol. 18 No. 4 (2018); 76-84 Revista da ABENO; Vol. 18 Núm. 4 (2018); 76-84 Revista da ABENO; v. 18 n. 4 (2018); 76-84 2595-0274 1679-5954 reponame:Revista da ABENO (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico (ABENO) instacron:ABENO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico (ABENO) |
instacron_str |
ABENO |
institution |
ABENO |
reponame_str |
Revista da ABENO (Online) |
collection |
Revista da ABENO (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da ABENO (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico (ABENO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revabeno@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797051147612061696 |