Enade in Dentistry: analysis and reflections using Revised Bloom Taxonomy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Amaral, Marcelo Augusto, Garbin, Clea Adas Saliba, Saliba, Nemre Adas
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da ABENO (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/398
Resumo: The objective of this study was to analyze the Collective Health (CH) questions in the Dentistry National Student Examination editions from 2004 to 2013, using the Revised Bloom Taxonomy: "Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create" and the undergraduate’s performance of the São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araçatuba in this exam. A documentary research was carried out, analyzing the evaluations of 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013.To identify the CH questions presented in the exams, it was used the knowledge objects described in the Article 86 of the Consolidation of Rules for Procedures in the Boards of Dentistry and then ranked according to the Revised Bloom Taxonomy (RBT): “Remember, Understand, To apply, Analyze, To evaluate, Create”. It was also identified the performance of the concluding undergraduates of UNESP/FOA. We evaluated 28 questions, of which 23 were objective and five were discursive. Considering the Enade editions, “Remember", "Understand" and "Apply" dimensions of the RTB were verified in seven questions and the mean of undergraduates successful for these dimensions was 65.53%. The "Analyze" dimension presented one question in 2004, four questions in 2007 and 2010 editions and two questions in the 2013 edition, and the mean which represents the successful of the undergraduates was 44.84%. Considering 10 questions of the "Evaluate" dimension, the performance was 61.00% in the 2010 edition, with a score varying from 43.10% to 81.40%, and for the 2013 edition, the mean was 60.60% varying from 32.30% to 79.20%. The "Analyze" and "Evaluate" educational objectives were more prevalent in the Dentistry National Student Examination, and the questions classified in these higher cognitive dimensions presented a lower hit rate when compared to the "Remember", "Understand", and "To apply"
id ABENO-2_b9b965d4f6a9ff3549224c36d5a3597a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revabeno.emnuvens.com.br:article/398
network_acronym_str ABENO-2
network_name_str Revista da ABENO (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Enade in Dentistry: analysis and reflections using Revised Bloom TaxonomyEnade em Odontologia: análise e reflexões à luz da Taxonomia de Bloom RevisadaEducational Measurement. Classification. Teaching. Dentistry.Avaliação Educacional. Classificação. Ensino. Odontologia.The objective of this study was to analyze the Collective Health (CH) questions in the Dentistry National Student Examination editions from 2004 to 2013, using the Revised Bloom Taxonomy: "Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create" and the undergraduate’s performance of the São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araçatuba in this exam. A documentary research was carried out, analyzing the evaluations of 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013.To identify the CH questions presented in the exams, it was used the knowledge objects described in the Article 86 of the Consolidation of Rules for Procedures in the Boards of Dentistry and then ranked according to the Revised Bloom Taxonomy (RBT): “Remember, Understand, To apply, Analyze, To evaluate, Create”. It was also identified the performance of the concluding undergraduates of UNESP/FOA. We evaluated 28 questions, of which 23 were objective and five were discursive. Considering the Enade editions, “Remember", "Understand" and "Apply" dimensions of the RTB were verified in seven questions and the mean of undergraduates successful for these dimensions was 65.53%. The "Analyze" dimension presented one question in 2004, four questions in 2007 and 2010 editions and two questions in the 2013 edition, and the mean which represents the successful of the undergraduates was 44.84%. Considering 10 questions of the "Evaluate" dimension, the performance was 61.00% in the 2010 edition, with a score varying from 43.10% to 81.40%, and for the 2013 edition, the mean was 60.60% varying from 32.30% to 79.20%. The "Analyze" and "Evaluate" educational objectives were more prevalent in the Dentistry National Student Examination, and the questions classified in these higher cognitive dimensions presented a lower hit rate when compared to the "Remember", "Understand", and "To apply"Objetivou-se analisar as questões de Saúde Coletiva (SC) das edições do Exame Nacional de Desempenho dos Estudantes (Enade) de Odontologia e o desempenho dos concluintes da Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), Faculdade de Odontologia de Araçatuba (FOA). Realizou-se uma pesquisa documental, com análise das avaliações de 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013. Para a identificação das questões de SC presentes nos exames foram utilizados os objetos elencados no Artigo 86 da Consolidação das Normas para Procedimentos nos Conselhos de Odontologia, e classificadas segundo a Taxonomia de Bloom Revisada (TBR): “Lembrar, Entender, Aplicar, Analisar, Avaliar, Criar”. Foram coletados os índices de desempenho dos concluintes da Unesp/FOA nos relatórios referentes às quatro avaliações. Foram consideradas 28 questões, sendo 23 objetivas e cinco discursivas. As dimensões “Lembrar”, “Entender” e “Aplicar” da TBR foram verificadas em sete questões e a média de acertos dos egressos para estas dimensões foi 65,53%. A dimensão “Analisar” apresentou-se em uma questão em 2004, quatro em 2007, quatro em 2010 e duas questões na edição de 2013 e o aproveitamento médio foi de 44,84%. Das dez questões da dimensão “Avaliar”, o desempenho médio foi de 61,00% na edição de 2010, com acerto variando de 43,10% a 81,40%, e para a edição de 2013 a média foi de 60,60%, com variação de 32,30% a 79,20%. Os objetivos educacionais “Analisar” e “Avaliar” foram mais prevalentes nas edições do Exame Nacional de Desempenho dos Estudantes e as questões classificadas nestas dimensões de maior nível cognitivo apresentaram menor taxa de acertos, quando comparadas às dimensões “Lembrar”, “Entender” e “Aplicar”.Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico2017-09-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/39810.30979/rev.abeno.v17i3.398Revista da ABENO; Vol. 17 No. 3 (2017); 30-40Revista da ABENO; Vol. 17 Núm. 3 (2017); 30-40Revista da ABENO; v. 17 n. 3 (2017); 30-402595-02741679-5954reponame:Revista da ABENO (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico (ABENO)instacron:ABENOporhttps://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/398/321Copyright (c) 2017 Revista da ABENOinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoimaz, Suzely Adas SalibaAmaral, Marcelo AugustoGarbin, Clea Adas SalibaSaliba, Nemre Adas2017-09-15T09:56:51Zoai:ojs.revabeno.emnuvens.com.br:article/398Revistahttps://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/indexONGhttps://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/oairevabeno@gmail.com2595-02741679-5954opendoar:2023-01-13T09:48:01.277903Revista da ABENO (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico (ABENO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Enade in Dentistry: analysis and reflections using Revised Bloom Taxonomy
Enade em Odontologia: análise e reflexões à luz da Taxonomia de Bloom Revisada
title Enade in Dentistry: analysis and reflections using Revised Bloom Taxonomy
spellingShingle Enade in Dentistry: analysis and reflections using Revised Bloom Taxonomy
Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba
Educational Measurement. Classification. Teaching. Dentistry.
Avaliação Educacional. Classificação. Ensino. Odontologia.
title_short Enade in Dentistry: analysis and reflections using Revised Bloom Taxonomy
title_full Enade in Dentistry: analysis and reflections using Revised Bloom Taxonomy
title_fullStr Enade in Dentistry: analysis and reflections using Revised Bloom Taxonomy
title_full_unstemmed Enade in Dentistry: analysis and reflections using Revised Bloom Taxonomy
title_sort Enade in Dentistry: analysis and reflections using Revised Bloom Taxonomy
author Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba
author_facet Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba
Amaral, Marcelo Augusto
Garbin, Clea Adas Saliba
Saliba, Nemre Adas
author_role author
author2 Amaral, Marcelo Augusto
Garbin, Clea Adas Saliba
Saliba, Nemre Adas
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moimaz, Suzely Adas Saliba
Amaral, Marcelo Augusto
Garbin, Clea Adas Saliba
Saliba, Nemre Adas
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Educational Measurement. Classification. Teaching. Dentistry.
Avaliação Educacional. Classificação. Ensino. Odontologia.
topic Educational Measurement. Classification. Teaching. Dentistry.
Avaliação Educacional. Classificação. Ensino. Odontologia.
description The objective of this study was to analyze the Collective Health (CH) questions in the Dentistry National Student Examination editions from 2004 to 2013, using the Revised Bloom Taxonomy: "Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create" and the undergraduate’s performance of the São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Dentistry, Araçatuba in this exam. A documentary research was carried out, analyzing the evaluations of 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013.To identify the CH questions presented in the exams, it was used the knowledge objects described in the Article 86 of the Consolidation of Rules for Procedures in the Boards of Dentistry and then ranked according to the Revised Bloom Taxonomy (RBT): “Remember, Understand, To apply, Analyze, To evaluate, Create”. It was also identified the performance of the concluding undergraduates of UNESP/FOA. We evaluated 28 questions, of which 23 were objective and five were discursive. Considering the Enade editions, “Remember", "Understand" and "Apply" dimensions of the RTB were verified in seven questions and the mean of undergraduates successful for these dimensions was 65.53%. The "Analyze" dimension presented one question in 2004, four questions in 2007 and 2010 editions and two questions in the 2013 edition, and the mean which represents the successful of the undergraduates was 44.84%. Considering 10 questions of the "Evaluate" dimension, the performance was 61.00% in the 2010 edition, with a score varying from 43.10% to 81.40%, and for the 2013 edition, the mean was 60.60% varying from 32.30% to 79.20%. The "Analyze" and "Evaluate" educational objectives were more prevalent in the Dentistry National Student Examination, and the questions classified in these higher cognitive dimensions presented a lower hit rate when compared to the "Remember", "Understand", and "To apply"
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/398
10.30979/rev.abeno.v17i3.398
url https://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/398
identifier_str_mv 10.30979/rev.abeno.v17i3.398
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revabeno.emnuvens.com.br/revabeno/article/view/398/321
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista da ABENO
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista da ABENO
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da ABENO; Vol. 17 No. 3 (2017); 30-40
Revista da ABENO; Vol. 17 Núm. 3 (2017); 30-40
Revista da ABENO; v. 17 n. 3 (2017); 30-40
2595-0274
1679-5954
reponame:Revista da ABENO (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico (ABENO)
instacron:ABENO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico (ABENO)
instacron_str ABENO
institution ABENO
reponame_str Revista da ABENO (Online)
collection Revista da ABENO (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da ABENO (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Ensino Odontológico (ABENO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revabeno@gmail.com
_version_ 1797051146583408640