Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Production |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100803 |
Resumo: | Abstract Paper aims The FMEA method (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) has difficulty in prioritizing actions, verifying agreements among group participants and assessing uncertainty. This paper overcomes these shortcomings. The proposal applies FMEA in traditional format, establishes priorities for improvement actions, updates them periodically with better criteria than the traditional ones and values group agreement. Originality Other contributions claim to change the method, but this is not accepted by the organizations that apply it. In addition, they propose individual approaches, when the FMEA is essentially group-based. In contrast, this proposal establishes priorities without altering the basic requirements of the FMEA. Research method An action-research approach is used. Main findings Ease of application, improved group learning and commitment to action plans are confirmed. Implications for theory and practice A new group decision-making method is applied and a flexible solution is proposed, adaptable to very diverse problems. |
id |
ABEPRO-1_4596de63406bb4777a60f80cb3e9dedf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-65132022000100803 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEPRO-1 |
network_name_str |
Production |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysisProcess approachCorrective actions managementGroup decision makingMulticriteria decision supportAbstract Paper aims The FMEA method (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) has difficulty in prioritizing actions, verifying agreements among group participants and assessing uncertainty. This paper overcomes these shortcomings. The proposal applies FMEA in traditional format, establishes priorities for improvement actions, updates them periodically with better criteria than the traditional ones and values group agreement. Originality Other contributions claim to change the method, but this is not accepted by the organizations that apply it. In addition, they propose individual approaches, when the FMEA is essentially group-based. In contrast, this proposal establishes priorities without altering the basic requirements of the FMEA. Research method An action-research approach is used. Main findings Ease of application, improved group learning and commitment to action plans are confirmed. Implications for theory and practice A new group decision-making method is applied and a flexible solution is proposed, adaptable to very diverse problems.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100803Production v.32 2022reponame:Productioninstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPRO10.1590/0103-6513.20210057info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZanazzi,José FranciscoZanazzi,José LuisPontelli,Danieleng2022-04-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-65132022000100803Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prod/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||production@editoracubo.com.br1980-54110103-6513opendoar:2022-04-07T00:00Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis |
title |
Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis |
spellingShingle |
Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis Zanazzi,José Francisco Process approach Corrective actions management Group decision making Multicriteria decision support |
title_short |
Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis |
title_full |
Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis |
title_fullStr |
Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis |
title_sort |
Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis |
author |
Zanazzi,José Francisco |
author_facet |
Zanazzi,José Francisco Zanazzi,José Luis Pontelli,Daniel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zanazzi,José Luis Pontelli,Daniel |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zanazzi,José Francisco Zanazzi,José Luis Pontelli,Daniel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Process approach Corrective actions management Group decision making Multicriteria decision support |
topic |
Process approach Corrective actions management Group decision making Multicriteria decision support |
description |
Abstract Paper aims The FMEA method (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) has difficulty in prioritizing actions, verifying agreements among group participants and assessing uncertainty. This paper overcomes these shortcomings. The proposal applies FMEA in traditional format, establishes priorities for improvement actions, updates them periodically with better criteria than the traditional ones and values group agreement. Originality Other contributions claim to change the method, but this is not accepted by the organizations that apply it. In addition, they propose individual approaches, when the FMEA is essentially group-based. In contrast, this proposal establishes priorities without altering the basic requirements of the FMEA. Research method An action-research approach is used. Main findings Ease of application, improved group learning and commitment to action plans are confirmed. Implications for theory and practice A new group decision-making method is applied and a flexible solution is proposed, adaptable to very diverse problems. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100803 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100803 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-6513.20210057 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Production v.32 2022 reponame:Production instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) instacron:ABEPRO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
instacron_str |
ABEPRO |
institution |
ABEPRO |
reponame_str |
Production |
collection |
Production |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||production@editoracubo.com.br |
_version_ |
1754213154894643200 |