Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zanazzi,José Francisco
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Zanazzi,José Luis, Pontelli,Daniel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Production
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100803
Resumo: Abstract Paper aims The FMEA method (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) has difficulty in prioritizing actions, verifying agreements among group participants and assessing uncertainty. This paper overcomes these shortcomings. The proposal applies FMEA in traditional format, establishes priorities for improvement actions, updates them periodically with better criteria than the traditional ones and values group agreement. Originality Other contributions claim to change the method, but this is not accepted by the organizations that apply it. In addition, they propose individual approaches, when the FMEA is essentially group-based. In contrast, this proposal establishes priorities without altering the basic requirements of the FMEA. Research method An action-research approach is used. Main findings Ease of application, improved group learning and commitment to action plans are confirmed. Implications for theory and practice A new group decision-making method is applied and a flexible solution is proposed, adaptable to very diverse problems.
id ABEPRO-1_4596de63406bb4777a60f80cb3e9dedf
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-65132022000100803
network_acronym_str ABEPRO-1
network_name_str Production
repository_id_str
spelling Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysisProcess approachCorrective actions managementGroup decision makingMulticriteria decision supportAbstract Paper aims The FMEA method (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) has difficulty in prioritizing actions, verifying agreements among group participants and assessing uncertainty. This paper overcomes these shortcomings. The proposal applies FMEA in traditional format, establishes priorities for improvement actions, updates them periodically with better criteria than the traditional ones and values group agreement. Originality Other contributions claim to change the method, but this is not accepted by the organizations that apply it. In addition, they propose individual approaches, when the FMEA is essentially group-based. In contrast, this proposal establishes priorities without altering the basic requirements of the FMEA. Research method An action-research approach is used. Main findings Ease of application, improved group learning and commitment to action plans are confirmed. Implications for theory and practice A new group decision-making method is applied and a flexible solution is proposed, adaptable to very diverse problems.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100803Production v.32 2022reponame:Productioninstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPRO10.1590/0103-6513.20210057info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZanazzi,José FranciscoZanazzi,José LuisPontelli,Danieleng2022-04-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-65132022000100803Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prod/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||production@editoracubo.com.br1980-54110103-6513opendoar:2022-04-07T00:00Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis
title Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis
spellingShingle Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis
Zanazzi,José Francisco
Process approach
Corrective actions management
Group decision making
Multicriteria decision support
title_short Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis
title_full Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis
title_fullStr Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis
title_full_unstemmed Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis
title_sort Group multicriteria method to prioritize actions in failure mode and effects analysis
author Zanazzi,José Francisco
author_facet Zanazzi,José Francisco
Zanazzi,José Luis
Pontelli,Daniel
author_role author
author2 Zanazzi,José Luis
Pontelli,Daniel
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zanazzi,José Francisco
Zanazzi,José Luis
Pontelli,Daniel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Process approach
Corrective actions management
Group decision making
Multicriteria decision support
topic Process approach
Corrective actions management
Group decision making
Multicriteria decision support
description Abstract Paper aims The FMEA method (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) has difficulty in prioritizing actions, verifying agreements among group participants and assessing uncertainty. This paper overcomes these shortcomings. The proposal applies FMEA in traditional format, establishes priorities for improvement actions, updates them periodically with better criteria than the traditional ones and values group agreement. Originality Other contributions claim to change the method, but this is not accepted by the organizations that apply it. In addition, they propose individual approaches, when the FMEA is essentially group-based. In contrast, this proposal establishes priorities without altering the basic requirements of the FMEA. Research method An action-research approach is used. Main findings Ease of application, improved group learning and commitment to action plans are confirmed. Implications for theory and practice A new group decision-making method is applied and a flexible solution is proposed, adaptable to very diverse problems.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100803
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100803
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6513.20210057
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Production v.32 2022
reponame:Production
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron:ABEPRO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron_str ABEPRO
institution ABEPRO
reponame_str Production
collection Production
repository.name.fl_str_mv Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||production@editoracubo.com.br
_version_ 1754213154894643200