GUIDELINES TO RISK MANAGEMENT MATURITY IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/V13N3A14 |
Resumo: | Purpose – This article aims to provide the guidelines to assess the risk management maturity (RMM) of construction projects.Design/methodology/approach – This article presents a literature review of the main risk management models, which aims to support a survey research to define, according to experts, the market preference and knowledge of RMM models.Findings – We pointed out in this article a set of guidelines to direct the maturity analysis of RM in the Construction Industry and proposed a model matrix to help companies to evaluate the maturity of the RM of a whole project or each activity separately.Research limitations/Implications – Limitations of this article include the search options originally defined by the researches in literature review and concepts and measures chosen to be evaluated by experts in the survey. Other approaches could explore the implementation of a RMM model considering quantitative measures in others areas.Practical Implications – The article provide to construction companies a way to measure their risk management capacity against four standard levels of maturity, allowing them to make benchmarking and to improve and increase their ability to manage risk.Originality/value – We highlighted to professionals and academics what factors were essential seeking to improve the risk management continuously. |
id |
ABEPRO_01c236adaa940e1e9a1a7d9420b22027 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/326 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEPRO |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
GUIDELINES TO RISK MANAGEMENT MATURITY IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTSRisk Management MaturityRisk ManagementConstruction Management.Purpose – This article aims to provide the guidelines to assess the risk management maturity (RMM) of construction projects.Design/methodology/approach – This article presents a literature review of the main risk management models, which aims to support a survey research to define, according to experts, the market preference and knowledge of RMM models.Findings – We pointed out in this article a set of guidelines to direct the maturity analysis of RM in the Construction Industry and proposed a model matrix to help companies to evaluate the maturity of the RM of a whole project or each activity separately.Research limitations/Implications – Limitations of this article include the search options originally defined by the researches in literature review and concepts and measures chosen to be evaluated by experts in the survey. Other approaches could explore the implementation of a RMM model considering quantitative measures in others areas.Practical Implications – The article provide to construction companies a way to measure their risk management capacity against four standard levels of maturity, allowing them to make benchmarking and to improve and increase their ability to manage risk.Originality/value – We highlighted to professionals and academics what factors were essential seeking to improve the risk management continuously.Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)2016-09-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed ArticleSurvey Research; Descriptive Statisticsapplication/pdfhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/V13N3A1410.14488/BJOPM.2016.v13.n3.a14Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2016): September, 2016; 372-3852237-8960reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPROenghttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/V13N3A14/BJOPMV13N3A14Copyright (c) 2016 Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Managementinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCaiado, Rodrigo Goyannes GusmãoLima, Gilson Brito AlvesNascimento, Daniel Luiz de MattosVieira Neto, Juliode Oliveira, Rodolpho Augusto Maultasch2021-07-13T14:15:08Zoai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/326Revistahttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopmONGhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/oaibjopm.journal@gmail.com2237-89601679-8171opendoar:2023-03-13T09:45:12.646117Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
GUIDELINES TO RISK MANAGEMENT MATURITY IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS |
title |
GUIDELINES TO RISK MANAGEMENT MATURITY IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS |
spellingShingle |
GUIDELINES TO RISK MANAGEMENT MATURITY IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Risk Management Maturity Risk Management Construction Management. |
title_short |
GUIDELINES TO RISK MANAGEMENT MATURITY IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS |
title_full |
GUIDELINES TO RISK MANAGEMENT MATURITY IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS |
title_fullStr |
GUIDELINES TO RISK MANAGEMENT MATURITY IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS |
title_full_unstemmed |
GUIDELINES TO RISK MANAGEMENT MATURITY IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS |
title_sort |
GUIDELINES TO RISK MANAGEMENT MATURITY IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS |
author |
Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão |
author_facet |
Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Lima, Gilson Brito Alves Nascimento, Daniel Luiz de Mattos Vieira Neto, Julio de Oliveira, Rodolpho Augusto Maultasch |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lima, Gilson Brito Alves Nascimento, Daniel Luiz de Mattos Vieira Neto, Julio de Oliveira, Rodolpho Augusto Maultasch |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes Gusmão Lima, Gilson Brito Alves Nascimento, Daniel Luiz de Mattos Vieira Neto, Julio de Oliveira, Rodolpho Augusto Maultasch |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Risk Management Maturity Risk Management Construction Management. |
topic |
Risk Management Maturity Risk Management Construction Management. |
description |
Purpose – This article aims to provide the guidelines to assess the risk management maturity (RMM) of construction projects.Design/methodology/approach – This article presents a literature review of the main risk management models, which aims to support a survey research to define, according to experts, the market preference and knowledge of RMM models.Findings – We pointed out in this article a set of guidelines to direct the maturity analysis of RM in the Construction Industry and proposed a model matrix to help companies to evaluate the maturity of the RM of a whole project or each activity separately.Research limitations/Implications – Limitations of this article include the search options originally defined by the researches in literature review and concepts and measures chosen to be evaluated by experts in the survey. Other approaches could explore the implementation of a RMM model considering quantitative measures in others areas.Practical Implications – The article provide to construction companies a way to measure their risk management capacity against four standard levels of maturity, allowing them to make benchmarking and to improve and increase their ability to manage risk.Originality/value – We highlighted to professionals and academics what factors were essential seeking to improve the risk management continuously. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-09-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article Survey Research; Descriptive Statistics |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/V13N3A14 10.14488/BJOPM.2016.v13.n3.a14 |
url |
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/V13N3A14 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14488/BJOPM.2016.v13.n3.a14 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/V13N3A14/BJOPMV13N3A14 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 13 No. 3 (2016): September, 2016; 372-385 2237-8960 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) instacron:ABEPRO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
instacron_str |
ABEPRO |
institution |
ABEPRO |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjopm.journal@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797051460501897216 |