ELECTRE ME: a proposal of an outranking modeling in situations with several evaluators

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Helder Gomes
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Nepomuceno, Livia Dias De Oliveira, Pereira, Valdecy
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
Texto Completo: https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/553
Resumo: Highlights: This paper describes an original proposal for modeling Multicriteria problems taking into account more than one evaluator. It allows each evaluator to have its own set of criteria. It also avoids the incoherency of adopting compensatory techniques into non-compensatory algorithms. Goal: This paper describes an original proposal for modeling multicriteria situations where multiple evaluators take part of the evaluation process. This proposal allows each evaluator to have its own set of criteria, including their weights, and also avoids the usual inconsistency of adopting pre-processing compensatory methods for introducing it into non-compensatory algorithms. Design / Methodology / Approach: In order to better describe how ELECTRE ME works, a multicriteria-multiple evaluator situation is modeled by ELECTRE TRI ME (as we have called the ELECTRE TRI variation that incorporates the principles of multiple evaluators). Results: ELECTRE ME was able to avoid the inconsistency of adopting contradictory mechanisms of aggregating preferences while modeling multicriteria & multiple evaluators problems (first called here as MCDA-ME). Limitations: Although the proposal focuses in situations with multiple evaluators, there is no restriction for its application in situations where there is only one decision maker. Practical implications: Another important feature of ELECTRE ME is that it allows each evaluator to consider its own set of criteria and its own scale for evaluation. Originality / Value:  ELECTRE ME avoids a contradictory approach to use compensatory algorithms (such as weighted mean) as an input in non-compensatory outranking methods. Despite the fact that non-compensatory principle is in the heart of the ELECTRE methods, it has not found a previous proposal with the attributes shown in this study: to incorporate outranking concepts in situations where more than one evaluator is present and, by extension, allow each evaluator to have its own set of criteria.
id ABEPRO_0dca21e4e427670c3abbbe1ba9460f01
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/553
network_acronym_str ABEPRO
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling ELECTRE ME: a proposal of an outranking modeling in situations with several evaluatorsDecision AnalysisMultiple CriteriaMulticriteriaMCDAMCDMHighlights: This paper describes an original proposal for modeling Multicriteria problems taking into account more than one evaluator. It allows each evaluator to have its own set of criteria. It also avoids the incoherency of adopting compensatory techniques into non-compensatory algorithms. Goal: This paper describes an original proposal for modeling multicriteria situations where multiple evaluators take part of the evaluation process. This proposal allows each evaluator to have its own set of criteria, including their weights, and also avoids the usual inconsistency of adopting pre-processing compensatory methods for introducing it into non-compensatory algorithms. Design / Methodology / Approach: In order to better describe how ELECTRE ME works, a multicriteria-multiple evaluator situation is modeled by ELECTRE TRI ME (as we have called the ELECTRE TRI variation that incorporates the principles of multiple evaluators). Results: ELECTRE ME was able to avoid the inconsistency of adopting contradictory mechanisms of aggregating preferences while modeling multicriteria & multiple evaluators problems (first called here as MCDA-ME). Limitations: Although the proposal focuses in situations with multiple evaluators, there is no restriction for its application in situations where there is only one decision maker. Practical implications: Another important feature of ELECTRE ME is that it allows each evaluator to consider its own set of criteria and its own scale for evaluation. Originality / Value:  ELECTRE ME avoids a contradictory approach to use compensatory algorithms (such as weighted mean) as an input in non-compensatory outranking methods. Despite the fact that non-compensatory principle is in the heart of the ELECTRE methods, it has not found a previous proposal with the attributes shown in this study: to incorporate outranking concepts in situations where more than one evaluator is present and, by extension, allow each evaluator to have its own set of criteria.Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)2018-11-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articletext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/55310.14488/BJOPM.2018.v15.n4.a10Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 15 No. 4 (2018): December, 2018; 566-5752237-8960reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPROenghttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/553/725https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/553/727Costa, Helder GomesNepomuceno, Livia Dias De OliveiraPereira, Valdecyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-07-13T14:14:25Zoai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/553Revistahttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopmONGhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/oaibjopm.journal@gmail.com2237-89601679-8171opendoar:2023-03-13T09:45:18.924233Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ELECTRE ME: a proposal of an outranking modeling in situations with several evaluators
title ELECTRE ME: a proposal of an outranking modeling in situations with several evaluators
spellingShingle ELECTRE ME: a proposal of an outranking modeling in situations with several evaluators
Costa, Helder Gomes
Decision Analysis
Multiple Criteria
Multicriteria
MCDA
MCDM
title_short ELECTRE ME: a proposal of an outranking modeling in situations with several evaluators
title_full ELECTRE ME: a proposal of an outranking modeling in situations with several evaluators
title_fullStr ELECTRE ME: a proposal of an outranking modeling in situations with several evaluators
title_full_unstemmed ELECTRE ME: a proposal of an outranking modeling in situations with several evaluators
title_sort ELECTRE ME: a proposal of an outranking modeling in situations with several evaluators
author Costa, Helder Gomes
author_facet Costa, Helder Gomes
Nepomuceno, Livia Dias De Oliveira
Pereira, Valdecy
author_role author
author2 Nepomuceno, Livia Dias De Oliveira
Pereira, Valdecy
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Helder Gomes
Nepomuceno, Livia Dias De Oliveira
Pereira, Valdecy
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Decision Analysis
Multiple Criteria
Multicriteria
MCDA
MCDM
topic Decision Analysis
Multiple Criteria
Multicriteria
MCDA
MCDM
description Highlights: This paper describes an original proposal for modeling Multicriteria problems taking into account more than one evaluator. It allows each evaluator to have its own set of criteria. It also avoids the incoherency of adopting compensatory techniques into non-compensatory algorithms. Goal: This paper describes an original proposal for modeling multicriteria situations where multiple evaluators take part of the evaluation process. This proposal allows each evaluator to have its own set of criteria, including their weights, and also avoids the usual inconsistency of adopting pre-processing compensatory methods for introducing it into non-compensatory algorithms. Design / Methodology / Approach: In order to better describe how ELECTRE ME works, a multicriteria-multiple evaluator situation is modeled by ELECTRE TRI ME (as we have called the ELECTRE TRI variation that incorporates the principles of multiple evaluators). Results: ELECTRE ME was able to avoid the inconsistency of adopting contradictory mechanisms of aggregating preferences while modeling multicriteria & multiple evaluators problems (first called here as MCDA-ME). Limitations: Although the proposal focuses in situations with multiple evaluators, there is no restriction for its application in situations where there is only one decision maker. Practical implications: Another important feature of ELECTRE ME is that it allows each evaluator to consider its own set of criteria and its own scale for evaluation. Originality / Value:  ELECTRE ME avoids a contradictory approach to use compensatory algorithms (such as weighted mean) as an input in non-compensatory outranking methods. Despite the fact that non-compensatory principle is in the heart of the ELECTRE methods, it has not found a previous proposal with the attributes shown in this study: to incorporate outranking concepts in situations where more than one evaluator is present and, by extension, allow each evaluator to have its own set of criteria.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-11-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/553
10.14488/BJOPM.2018.v15.n4.a10
url https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/553
identifier_str_mv 10.14488/BJOPM.2018.v15.n4.a10
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/553/725
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/553/727
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 15 No. 4 (2018): December, 2018; 566-575
2237-8960
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron:ABEPRO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron_str ABEPRO
institution ABEPRO
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjopm.journal@gmail.com
_version_ 1797051461010456576