Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lucena, Arthur Felipe Echs
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: De Mori, Luci Mercedes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
Texto Completo: https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/453
Resumo: The Lean Construction philosophy emerged to assist overcome the challenges in optimizing the productive processes of companies. As an effort to quantify the application degree of Lean philosophy in the civil construction companies, several measurement tools were created. In order to discuss the effectiveness of these tools into measuring the presence of the Lean philosophy in construction sites, the present study performed a critical analysis of its methodological procedures, based on four aspects: ‘questionnaires and forms’, ‘answering system’, ‘data collection methodology’, and ‘results’. Although it was not possible to investigate measuring tools from other countries, it was concluded that, among Brazilian methods, the one developed by Pereira (2012) is the most suitable for use since it presented just few problems in its formulation. This way, it is possible to do the intended measurement with assertiveness, substantially contributing to civil construction development.
id ABEPRO_f77c48275ff327f9551e388ce8e57e4e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/453
network_acronym_str ABEPRO
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring toolsToyota Production SystemCivil constructionConstruction sitesConstruction managementProduction managementThe Lean Construction philosophy emerged to assist overcome the challenges in optimizing the productive processes of companies. As an effort to quantify the application degree of Lean philosophy in the civil construction companies, several measurement tools were created. In order to discuss the effectiveness of these tools into measuring the presence of the Lean philosophy in construction sites, the present study performed a critical analysis of its methodological procedures, based on four aspects: ‘questionnaires and forms’, ‘answering system’, ‘data collection methodology’, and ‘results’. Although it was not possible to investigate measuring tools from other countries, it was concluded that, among Brazilian methods, the one developed by Pereira (2012) is the most suitable for use since it presented just few problems in its formulation. This way, it is possible to do the intended measurement with assertiveness, substantially contributing to civil construction development.Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)2018-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articletext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/45310.14488/BJOPM.2018.v15.n2.a13Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018): June, 2018; 311-3212237-8960reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPROenghttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/453/609https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/453/627Copyright (c) 2018 Arthur Felipe Echs Lucena, Luci Mercedes De Moriinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLucena, Arthur Felipe EchsDe Mori, Luci Mercedes2021-07-13T14:14:33Zoai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/453Revistahttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopmONGhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/oaibjopm.journal@gmail.com2237-89601679-8171opendoar:2023-03-13T09:45:17.780848Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools
title Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools
spellingShingle Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools
Lucena, Arthur Felipe Echs
Toyota Production System
Civil construction
Construction sites
Construction management
Production management
title_short Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools
title_full Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools
title_fullStr Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools
title_full_unstemmed Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools
title_sort Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools
author Lucena, Arthur Felipe Echs
author_facet Lucena, Arthur Felipe Echs
De Mori, Luci Mercedes
author_role author
author2 De Mori, Luci Mercedes
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lucena, Arthur Felipe Echs
De Mori, Luci Mercedes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Toyota Production System
Civil construction
Construction sites
Construction management
Production management
topic Toyota Production System
Civil construction
Construction sites
Construction management
Production management
description The Lean Construction philosophy emerged to assist overcome the challenges in optimizing the productive processes of companies. As an effort to quantify the application degree of Lean philosophy in the civil construction companies, several measurement tools were created. In order to discuss the effectiveness of these tools into measuring the presence of the Lean philosophy in construction sites, the present study performed a critical analysis of its methodological procedures, based on four aspects: ‘questionnaires and forms’, ‘answering system’, ‘data collection methodology’, and ‘results’. Although it was not possible to investigate measuring tools from other countries, it was concluded that, among Brazilian methods, the one developed by Pereira (2012) is the most suitable for use since it presented just few problems in its formulation. This way, it is possible to do the intended measurement with assertiveness, substantially contributing to civil construction development.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/453
10.14488/BJOPM.2018.v15.n2.a13
url https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/453
identifier_str_mv 10.14488/BJOPM.2018.v15.n2.a13
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/453/609
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/453/627
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Arthur Felipe Echs Lucena, Luci Mercedes De Mori
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Arthur Felipe Echs Lucena, Luci Mercedes De Mori
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018): June, 2018; 311-321
2237-8960
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron:ABEPRO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron_str ABEPRO
institution ABEPRO
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bjopm.journal@gmail.com
_version_ 1797051460929716224