Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/453 |
Resumo: | The Lean Construction philosophy emerged to assist overcome the challenges in optimizing the productive processes of companies. As an effort to quantify the application degree of Lean philosophy in the civil construction companies, several measurement tools were created. In order to discuss the effectiveness of these tools into measuring the presence of the Lean philosophy in construction sites, the present study performed a critical analysis of its methodological procedures, based on four aspects: ‘questionnaires and forms’, ‘answering system’, ‘data collection methodology’, and ‘results’. Although it was not possible to investigate measuring tools from other countries, it was concluded that, among Brazilian methods, the one developed by Pereira (2012) is the most suitable for use since it presented just few problems in its formulation. This way, it is possible to do the intended measurement with assertiveness, substantially contributing to civil construction development. |
id |
ABEPRO_f77c48275ff327f9551e388ce8e57e4e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/453 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEPRO |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring toolsToyota Production SystemCivil constructionConstruction sitesConstruction managementProduction managementThe Lean Construction philosophy emerged to assist overcome the challenges in optimizing the productive processes of companies. As an effort to quantify the application degree of Lean philosophy in the civil construction companies, several measurement tools were created. In order to discuss the effectiveness of these tools into measuring the presence of the Lean philosophy in construction sites, the present study performed a critical analysis of its methodological procedures, based on four aspects: ‘questionnaires and forms’, ‘answering system’, ‘data collection methodology’, and ‘results’. Although it was not possible to investigate measuring tools from other countries, it was concluded that, among Brazilian methods, the one developed by Pereira (2012) is the most suitable for use since it presented just few problems in its formulation. This way, it is possible to do the intended measurement with assertiveness, substantially contributing to civil construction development.Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)2018-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articletext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/45310.14488/BJOPM.2018.v15.n2.a13Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018): June, 2018; 311-3212237-8960reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPROenghttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/453/609https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/453/627Copyright (c) 2018 Arthur Felipe Echs Lucena, Luci Mercedes De Moriinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLucena, Arthur Felipe EchsDe Mori, Luci Mercedes2021-07-13T14:14:33Zoai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/453Revistahttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopmONGhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/oaibjopm.journal@gmail.com2237-89601679-8171opendoar:2023-03-13T09:45:17.780848Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools |
title |
Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools |
spellingShingle |
Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools Lucena, Arthur Felipe Echs Toyota Production System Civil construction Construction sites Construction management Production management |
title_short |
Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools |
title_full |
Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools |
title_fullStr |
Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools |
title_full_unstemmed |
Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools |
title_sort |
Critical analysis of Lean Construction measuring tools |
author |
Lucena, Arthur Felipe Echs |
author_facet |
Lucena, Arthur Felipe Echs De Mori, Luci Mercedes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
De Mori, Luci Mercedes |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lucena, Arthur Felipe Echs De Mori, Luci Mercedes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Toyota Production System Civil construction Construction sites Construction management Production management |
topic |
Toyota Production System Civil construction Construction sites Construction management Production management |
description |
The Lean Construction philosophy emerged to assist overcome the challenges in optimizing the productive processes of companies. As an effort to quantify the application degree of Lean philosophy in the civil construction companies, several measurement tools were created. In order to discuss the effectiveness of these tools into measuring the presence of the Lean philosophy in construction sites, the present study performed a critical analysis of its methodological procedures, based on four aspects: ‘questionnaires and forms’, ‘answering system’, ‘data collection methodology’, and ‘results’. Although it was not possible to investigate measuring tools from other countries, it was concluded that, among Brazilian methods, the one developed by Pereira (2012) is the most suitable for use since it presented just few problems in its formulation. This way, it is possible to do the intended measurement with assertiveness, substantially contributing to civil construction development. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/453 10.14488/BJOPM.2018.v15.n2.a13 |
url |
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/453 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.14488/BJOPM.2018.v15.n2.a13 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/453/609 https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/453/627 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Arthur Felipe Echs Lucena, Luci Mercedes De Mori info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Arthur Felipe Echs Lucena, Luci Mercedes De Mori |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018): June, 2018; 311-321 2237-8960 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) instacron:ABEPRO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
instacron_str |
ABEPRO |
institution |
ABEPRO |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjopm.journal@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797051460929716224 |