Fractionation of Apis mellifera venom by means of ultrafiltration: removal of phospholipase A 2
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322018000100229 |
Resumo: | Abstract The fractionation of apitoxin (bee venom) by means of a commercial 10 kDa ultrafiltration membrane was investigated aiming at the removal of phospholipase A2, the main allergenic substance. The feed content was varied from 1 to 50 g apitoxin/L, in deionized water, and caused changes in membrane flux and rejection, due to concentration polarization. The increase in pressure difference and stirring rate improved the flux through the membrane. The best result was achieved for 1 g apitoxin/L in feed stream, with a pressure difference of 220 kPa, and 750 rpm, with a permeate flux of 103 kg/m2h. The use of ultrafiltration was efficient to improve the permeate safety since biological tests revealed that the remaining enzyme lost its ability to catalyze the hydrolysis of phospholipids. |
id |
ABEQ-1_ba5ae39c29d03f2d85f82ca8600c41c1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-66322018000100229 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEQ-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Fractionation of Apis mellifera venom by means of ultrafiltration: removal of phospholipase A 2apitoxinmelittinmembranephospholipase A2ultrafiltrationAbstract The fractionation of apitoxin (bee venom) by means of a commercial 10 kDa ultrafiltration membrane was investigated aiming at the removal of phospholipase A2, the main allergenic substance. The feed content was varied from 1 to 50 g apitoxin/L, in deionized water, and caused changes in membrane flux and rejection, due to concentration polarization. The increase in pressure difference and stirring rate improved the flux through the membrane. The best result was achieved for 1 g apitoxin/L in feed stream, with a pressure difference of 220 kPa, and 750 rpm, with a permeate flux of 103 kg/m2h. The use of ultrafiltration was efficient to improve the permeate safety since biological tests revealed that the remaining enzyme lost its ability to catalyze the hydrolysis of phospholipids.Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322018000100229Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.35 n.1 2018reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineeringinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)instacron:ABEQ10.1590/0104-6632.20180351s20160171info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBrito,Júlio César Moreira deBastos,Esther Margarida Alves FerreiraHeneine,Luiz Guilherme DiasFigueiredo,Kátia Cecília de Souzaeng2018-04-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-66322018000100229Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjce/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br1678-43830104-6632opendoar:2018-04-19T00:00Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Fractionation of Apis mellifera venom by means of ultrafiltration: removal of phospholipase A 2 |
title |
Fractionation of Apis mellifera venom by means of ultrafiltration: removal of phospholipase A 2 |
spellingShingle |
Fractionation of Apis mellifera venom by means of ultrafiltration: removal of phospholipase A 2 Brito,Júlio César Moreira de apitoxin melittin membrane phospholipase A2 ultrafiltration |
title_short |
Fractionation of Apis mellifera venom by means of ultrafiltration: removal of phospholipase A 2 |
title_full |
Fractionation of Apis mellifera venom by means of ultrafiltration: removal of phospholipase A 2 |
title_fullStr |
Fractionation of Apis mellifera venom by means of ultrafiltration: removal of phospholipase A 2 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fractionation of Apis mellifera venom by means of ultrafiltration: removal of phospholipase A 2 |
title_sort |
Fractionation of Apis mellifera venom by means of ultrafiltration: removal of phospholipase A 2 |
author |
Brito,Júlio César Moreira de |
author_facet |
Brito,Júlio César Moreira de Bastos,Esther Margarida Alves Ferreira Heneine,Luiz Guilherme Dias Figueiredo,Kátia Cecília de Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bastos,Esther Margarida Alves Ferreira Heneine,Luiz Guilherme Dias Figueiredo,Kátia Cecília de Souza |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Brito,Júlio César Moreira de Bastos,Esther Margarida Alves Ferreira Heneine,Luiz Guilherme Dias Figueiredo,Kátia Cecília de Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
apitoxin melittin membrane phospholipase A2 ultrafiltration |
topic |
apitoxin melittin membrane phospholipase A2 ultrafiltration |
description |
Abstract The fractionation of apitoxin (bee venom) by means of a commercial 10 kDa ultrafiltration membrane was investigated aiming at the removal of phospholipase A2, the main allergenic substance. The feed content was varied from 1 to 50 g apitoxin/L, in deionized water, and caused changes in membrane flux and rejection, due to concentration polarization. The increase in pressure difference and stirring rate improved the flux through the membrane. The best result was achieved for 1 g apitoxin/L in feed stream, with a pressure difference of 220 kPa, and 750 rpm, with a permeate flux of 103 kg/m2h. The use of ultrafiltration was efficient to improve the permeate safety since biological tests revealed that the remaining enzyme lost its ability to catalyze the hydrolysis of phospholipids. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322018000100229 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322018000100229 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0104-6632.20180351s20160171 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.35 n.1 2018 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ) instacron:ABEQ |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ) |
instacron_str |
ABEQ |
institution |
ABEQ |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br |
_version_ |
1754213175873503232 |