Comparative histomorphometric analysis between α-Tcp cement and β-Tcp/Ha granules in the bone repair of rat calvaria
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Materials research (São Carlos. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392011000100004 |
Resumo: | This study compared the effect of two bioceramics on the process of bone repair: α-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP) cement and β-tricalcium phosphate hydroxyapatite particles (β-TCP/HA). Calvarial defects were created in 50 rats, divided into two groups (α and β/HA). Software was used at 7, 21, 60, 90 and 120 days to assess bone formation. Mean new bone formation rates were as follows: α group, 1.6% at 7 days, 5.24% at 21 days, 24% at 60 days, 30.21% at 90 days and 50.59% at 120 days; β/HA group, 1.94% at 7 days, 2.53% at 21 days, 12.47% at 60 days, 26.84% at 90 days and 38.82% at 120 days; control group, 0.15% at 7 days, 10.12% at 21 days, 15.10% at 60 days, 18.94% at 90 days, 48.50% at 120 days. Both materials are osteoconductive and biocompatible. Perhaps the larger rate of new bone formation observed in the α-TCP group, it also occurs in the β-TCP/HA group within a longer time period. |
id |
ABMABCABPOL-1_bc736e7f5d1aa1f04d59d521cc76e22c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-14392011000100004 |
network_acronym_str |
ABMABCABPOL-1 |
network_name_str |
Materials research (São Carlos. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparative histomorphometric analysis between α-Tcp cement and β-Tcp/Ha granules in the bone repair of rat calvariabone defectcalcium phosphateThis study compared the effect of two bioceramics on the process of bone repair: α-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP) cement and β-tricalcium phosphate hydroxyapatite particles (β-TCP/HA). Calvarial defects were created in 50 rats, divided into two groups (α and β/HA). Software was used at 7, 21, 60, 90 and 120 days to assess bone formation. Mean new bone formation rates were as follows: α group, 1.6% at 7 days, 5.24% at 21 days, 24% at 60 days, 30.21% at 90 days and 50.59% at 120 days; β/HA group, 1.94% at 7 days, 2.53% at 21 days, 12.47% at 60 days, 26.84% at 90 days and 38.82% at 120 days; control group, 0.15% at 7 days, 10.12% at 21 days, 15.10% at 60 days, 18.94% at 90 days, 48.50% at 120 days. Both materials are osteoconductive and biocompatible. Perhaps the larger rate of new bone formation observed in the α-TCP group, it also occurs in the β-TCP/HA group within a longer time period.ABM, ABC, ABPol2011-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392011000100004Materials Research v.14 n.1 2011reponame:Materials research (São Carlos. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:ABM ABC ABPOL10.1590/S1516-14392011005000020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGrandi,GiselaHeitz,ClaitonSantos,Luiz Alberto dosSilva,Miguel LucianoSant'Ana Filho,ManoelPagnocelli,Rogerio MirandaSilva,Daniela Nascimentoeng2011-04-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-14392011000100004Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/mrPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpdedz@power.ufscar.br1980-53731516-1439opendoar:2011-04-15T00:00Materials research (São Carlos. Online) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparative histomorphometric analysis between α-Tcp cement and β-Tcp/Ha granules in the bone repair of rat calvaria |
title |
Comparative histomorphometric analysis between α-Tcp cement and β-Tcp/Ha granules in the bone repair of rat calvaria |
spellingShingle |
Comparative histomorphometric analysis between α-Tcp cement and β-Tcp/Ha granules in the bone repair of rat calvaria Grandi,Gisela bone defect calcium phosphate |
title_short |
Comparative histomorphometric analysis between α-Tcp cement and β-Tcp/Ha granules in the bone repair of rat calvaria |
title_full |
Comparative histomorphometric analysis between α-Tcp cement and β-Tcp/Ha granules in the bone repair of rat calvaria |
title_fullStr |
Comparative histomorphometric analysis between α-Tcp cement and β-Tcp/Ha granules in the bone repair of rat calvaria |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative histomorphometric analysis between α-Tcp cement and β-Tcp/Ha granules in the bone repair of rat calvaria |
title_sort |
Comparative histomorphometric analysis between α-Tcp cement and β-Tcp/Ha granules in the bone repair of rat calvaria |
author |
Grandi,Gisela |
author_facet |
Grandi,Gisela Heitz,Claiton Santos,Luiz Alberto dos Silva,Miguel Luciano Sant'Ana Filho,Manoel Pagnocelli,Rogerio Miranda Silva,Daniela Nascimento |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Heitz,Claiton Santos,Luiz Alberto dos Silva,Miguel Luciano Sant'Ana Filho,Manoel Pagnocelli,Rogerio Miranda Silva,Daniela Nascimento |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Grandi,Gisela Heitz,Claiton Santos,Luiz Alberto dos Silva,Miguel Luciano Sant'Ana Filho,Manoel Pagnocelli,Rogerio Miranda Silva,Daniela Nascimento |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
bone defect calcium phosphate |
topic |
bone defect calcium phosphate |
description |
This study compared the effect of two bioceramics on the process of bone repair: α-tricalcium phosphate (α-TCP) cement and β-tricalcium phosphate hydroxyapatite particles (β-TCP/HA). Calvarial defects were created in 50 rats, divided into two groups (α and β/HA). Software was used at 7, 21, 60, 90 and 120 days to assess bone formation. Mean new bone formation rates were as follows: α group, 1.6% at 7 days, 5.24% at 21 days, 24% at 60 days, 30.21% at 90 days and 50.59% at 120 days; β/HA group, 1.94% at 7 days, 2.53% at 21 days, 12.47% at 60 days, 26.84% at 90 days and 38.82% at 120 days; control group, 0.15% at 7 days, 10.12% at 21 days, 15.10% at 60 days, 18.94% at 90 days, 48.50% at 120 days. Both materials are osteoconductive and biocompatible. Perhaps the larger rate of new bone formation observed in the α-TCP group, it also occurs in the β-TCP/HA group within a longer time period. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-03-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392011000100004 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392011000100004 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S1516-14392011005000020 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABM, ABC, ABPol |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ABM, ABC, ABPol |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Materials Research v.14 n.1 2011 reponame:Materials research (São Carlos. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) instacron:ABM ABC ABPOL |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
instacron_str |
ABM ABC ABPOL |
institution |
ABM ABC ABPOL |
reponame_str |
Materials research (São Carlos. Online) |
collection |
Materials research (São Carlos. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Materials research (São Carlos. Online) - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dedz@power.ufscar.br |
_version_ |
1754212660134543360 |