Wollastonite/TCP composites for bone regeneration: systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Cerâmica (São Paulo. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0366-69132020000300277 |
Resumo: | Abstract Composite biomaterials have gained notoriety in recent decades due to the ability to combine desirable properties of each material. Thus, associating bioactivity of wollastonite (W) with biodegradability of tricalcium phosphate (TCP) becomes promising for bone repair. Therefore, this study investigated, through systematic review and meta-analysis, in vivo studies that evaluated histomorphometrically the bone repair after implantation of W/TCP composites. The searches were performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS/BIREME/Virtual Health Library (VHL), and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) databases. A total of 312 studies were identified in the databases, of which 6 were included. In data comparison, it was considered the percentage of neoformed bone (NB). Composites with a higher percentage of W and/or in the scaffold format presented higher NB. These results suggested that the association of these two materials, as well as the porous scaffold format, was determinant on NB, which makes these new composites potential for clinical use. |
id |
USP-29_306206ae7c9846771c6493320dc0f49c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0366-69132020000300277 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-29 |
network_name_str |
Cerâmica (São Paulo. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Wollastonite/TCP composites for bone regeneration: systematic review and meta-analysisbiomaterialscalcium phosphatesbone regenerationsystematic reviewcalcium silicatesAbstract Composite biomaterials have gained notoriety in recent decades due to the ability to combine desirable properties of each material. Thus, associating bioactivity of wollastonite (W) with biodegradability of tricalcium phosphate (TCP) becomes promising for bone repair. Therefore, this study investigated, through systematic review and meta-analysis, in vivo studies that evaluated histomorphometrically the bone repair after implantation of W/TCP composites. The searches were performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS/BIREME/Virtual Health Library (VHL), and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) databases. A total of 312 studies were identified in the databases, of which 6 were included. In data comparison, it was considered the percentage of neoformed bone (NB). Composites with a higher percentage of W and/or in the scaffold format presented higher NB. These results suggested that the association of these two materials, as well as the porous scaffold format, was determinant on NB, which makes these new composites potential for clinical use.Associação Brasileira de Cerâmica2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0366-69132020000300277Cerâmica v.66 n.379 2020reponame:Cerâmica (São Paulo. Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/0366-69132020663792926info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,G. G. dosMeireles,E. C. A.Miguel,F. B.eng2020-07-14T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0366-69132020000300277Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/ce/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpceram.abc@gmail.com||ceram.abc@gmail.com1678-45530366-6913opendoar:2020-07-14T00:00Cerâmica (São Paulo. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Wollastonite/TCP composites for bone regeneration: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
Wollastonite/TCP composites for bone regeneration: systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Wollastonite/TCP composites for bone regeneration: systematic review and meta-analysis Santos,G. G. dos biomaterials calcium phosphates bone regeneration systematic review calcium silicates |
title_short |
Wollastonite/TCP composites for bone regeneration: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Wollastonite/TCP composites for bone regeneration: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Wollastonite/TCP composites for bone regeneration: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Wollastonite/TCP composites for bone regeneration: systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Wollastonite/TCP composites for bone regeneration: systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Santos,G. G. dos |
author_facet |
Santos,G. G. dos Meireles,E. C. A. Miguel,F. B. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Meireles,E. C. A. Miguel,F. B. |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos,G. G. dos Meireles,E. C. A. Miguel,F. B. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
biomaterials calcium phosphates bone regeneration systematic review calcium silicates |
topic |
biomaterials calcium phosphates bone regeneration systematic review calcium silicates |
description |
Abstract Composite biomaterials have gained notoriety in recent decades due to the ability to combine desirable properties of each material. Thus, associating bioactivity of wollastonite (W) with biodegradability of tricalcium phosphate (TCP) becomes promising for bone repair. Therefore, this study investigated, through systematic review and meta-analysis, in vivo studies that evaluated histomorphometrically the bone repair after implantation of W/TCP composites. The searches were performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS/BIREME/Virtual Health Library (VHL), and Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) databases. A total of 312 studies were identified in the databases, of which 6 were included. In data comparison, it was considered the percentage of neoformed bone (NB). Composites with a higher percentage of W and/or in the scaffold format presented higher NB. These results suggested that the association of these two materials, as well as the porous scaffold format, was determinant on NB, which makes these new composites potential for clinical use. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0366-69132020000300277 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0366-69132020000300277 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0366-69132020663792926 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Cerâmica |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Cerâmica |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cerâmica v.66 n.379 2020 reponame:Cerâmica (São Paulo. Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Cerâmica (São Paulo. Online) |
collection |
Cerâmica (São Paulo. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cerâmica (São Paulo. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ceram.abc@gmail.com||ceram.abc@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1748936784697360384 |