A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Nancy Kudsi
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Alvares, Gustavo Ribeiro, Sassone, Luciana Moura, Krebs, Renato Liess, Coutinho-Filho, Tauby Souza, Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
Texto Completo: https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/996
Resumo: Objective: to evaluate the efficacy of Reciproc System, with or without solvent for endodontic filling removal from oval shaped root canals. The time required for gutta-percha removal and the instrument fracture were also evaluated. Material and Methods: forty straight single-rooted premolars were prepared up to a size 30 and filled with gutta-percha and sealer, then randomly assigned to two retreatment groups (n = 20), treated with Reciproc System with or without chloroform (RS+C and RS). For all roots, procedural errors, time of retreatment and apically extruded material were recorded. After retreatment, roots were split longitudinally and then photographed. All images were evaluated with Image Tool software to calculate the percentage of residual material. Kolmogorov Smirnov and t tests were used to determine significant differences at P < .05. Results: no treatment completely removed the root filling material from the root canals. Analysis of the total area did not reveal statistical differences between the two groups (P>.05). Both groups also showed similar results in all tested thirds, with no statistical differences (P>.05). RS without solvent was faster in filling material removal than RS+C (P
id ABO-1_6e0bc5cfbf9f609a5f163f8756617034
oai_identifier_str oai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/996
network_acronym_str ABO-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
repository_id_str
spelling A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solventAvaliação comparativa da eficácia de um sistema alternativo de remoção de guta-percha com ou sem solventeDENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY)Endodontic retreatment; Reciprocating; Instrumentation; SolventsMEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)Retratamento endodôntico; Reciprocar; Instrumentação; SolventesObjective: to evaluate the efficacy of Reciproc System, with or without solvent for endodontic filling removal from oval shaped root canals. The time required for gutta-percha removal and the instrument fracture were also evaluated. Material and Methods: forty straight single-rooted premolars were prepared up to a size 30 and filled with gutta-percha and sealer, then randomly assigned to two retreatment groups (n = 20), treated with Reciproc System with or without chloroform (RS+C and RS). For all roots, procedural errors, time of retreatment and apically extruded material were recorded. After retreatment, roots were split longitudinally and then photographed. All images were evaluated with Image Tool software to calculate the percentage of residual material. Kolmogorov Smirnov and t tests were used to determine significant differences at P < .05. Results: no treatment completely removed the root filling material from the root canals. Analysis of the total area did not reveal statistical differences between the two groups (P>.05). Both groups also showed similar results in all tested thirds, with no statistical differences (P>.05). RS without solvent was faster in filling material removal than RS+C (PObjetivo: avaliar a eficácia do Sistema Reciproc, com ou sem solvente, para remoção do enchimento endodôntico de canais radiculares ovais. O tempo necessário para a remoção da guta-percha e a fratura do instrumento também foram avaliados. Material e Métodos: quarenta pré-molares unirradiculares retos foram confeccionados até o tamanho 30 e preenchidos com guta-percha e cimento, sendo aleatoriamente divididos em dois grupos de retratamento (n = 20), tratados com Sistema Reciproc com ou sem clorofórmio (RS + C e RS). Para todas as raízes, foram registrados erros de procedimento, tempo de retratamento e material apicalmente extrusado. Após o retratamento, as raízes foram divididas longitudinalmente e depois fotografadas. Todas as imagens foram avaliadas com o software Image Tool para calcular a porcentagem de material residual. Os testes de Kolmogorov Smirnov e t foram usados ??para determinar diferenças significativas em P 0,05). Ambos os grupos também mostraram resultados semelhantes em todos os terços testados, sem diferenças estatísticas (P> 0,05). O RS sem solvente foi mais rápido no preenchimento da remoção do material que o RS + C (P Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de JaneiroCarvalho, Nancy KudsiAlvares, Gustavo RibeiroSassone, Luciana MouraKrebs, Renato LiessCoutinho-Filho, Tauby SouzaSilva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da2017-09-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionOriginal ArticleArtigo originalapplication/pdfhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/99610.18363/rbo.v74n3.p.210Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 74, n. 3 (2017); 210Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 74, n. 3 (2017); 2101984-3747reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologiainstname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)instacron:ABOenghttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/996/644ContemporaryContemporâneaDireitos autorais 2017 Rev. Bras. Odontol.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-01-14T12:39:21Zoai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/996Revistahttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rboONGhttp://www.revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oaihttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai0034-72721984-3747opendoar:2019-01-14T12:39:21Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent
Avaliação comparativa da eficácia de um sistema alternativo de remoção de guta-percha com ou sem solvente
title A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent
spellingShingle A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent
Carvalho, Nancy Kudsi
DENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY)
Endodontic retreatment; Reciprocating; Instrumentation; Solvents
MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)
Retratamento endodôntico; Reciprocar; Instrumentação; Solventes
title_short A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent
title_full A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent
title_fullStr A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent
title_full_unstemmed A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent
title_sort A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent
author Carvalho, Nancy Kudsi
author_facet Carvalho, Nancy Kudsi
Alvares, Gustavo Ribeiro
Sassone, Luciana Moura
Krebs, Renato Liess
Coutinho-Filho, Tauby Souza
Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da
author_role author
author2 Alvares, Gustavo Ribeiro
Sassone, Luciana Moura
Krebs, Renato Liess
Coutinho-Filho, Tauby Souza
Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Nancy Kudsi
Alvares, Gustavo Ribeiro
Sassone, Luciana Moura
Krebs, Renato Liess
Coutinho-Filho, Tauby Souza
Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv

dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv DENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY)
Endodontic retreatment; Reciprocating; Instrumentation; Solvents
MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)
Retratamento endodôntico; Reciprocar; Instrumentação; Solventes
topic DENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY)
Endodontic retreatment; Reciprocating; Instrumentation; Solvents
MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)
Retratamento endodôntico; Reciprocar; Instrumentação; Solventes
description Objective: to evaluate the efficacy of Reciproc System, with or without solvent for endodontic filling removal from oval shaped root canals. The time required for gutta-percha removal and the instrument fracture were also evaluated. Material and Methods: forty straight single-rooted premolars were prepared up to a size 30 and filled with gutta-percha and sealer, then randomly assigned to two retreatment groups (n = 20), treated with Reciproc System with or without chloroform (RS+C and RS). For all roots, procedural errors, time of retreatment and apically extruded material were recorded. After retreatment, roots were split longitudinally and then photographed. All images were evaluated with Image Tool software to calculate the percentage of residual material. Kolmogorov Smirnov and t tests were used to determine significant differences at P < .05. Results: no treatment completely removed the root filling material from the root canals. Analysis of the total area did not reveal statistical differences between the two groups (P>.05). Both groups also showed similar results in all tested thirds, with no statistical differences (P>.05). RS without solvent was faster in filling material removal than RS+C (P
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-25
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Original Article
Artigo original
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/996
10.18363/rbo.v74n3.p.210
url https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/996
identifier_str_mv 10.18363/rbo.v74n3.p.210
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/996/644
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2017 Rev. Bras. Odontol.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2017 Rev. Bras. Odontol.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv
Contemporary


Contemporânea
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 74, n. 3 (2017); 210
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 74, n. 3 (2017); 210
1984-3747
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
instname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
instacron:ABO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
instacron_str ABO
institution ABO
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
collection Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai
_version_ 1798313204368015360

Registros relacionados