A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/996 |
Resumo: | Objective: to evaluate the efficacy of Reciproc System, with or without solvent for endodontic filling removal from oval shaped root canals. The time required for gutta-percha removal and the instrument fracture were also evaluated. Material and Methods: forty straight single-rooted premolars were prepared up to a size 30 and filled with gutta-percha and sealer, then randomly assigned to two retreatment groups (n = 20), treated with Reciproc System with or without chloroform (RS+C and RS). For all roots, procedural errors, time of retreatment and apically extruded material were recorded. After retreatment, roots were split longitudinally and then photographed. All images were evaluated with Image Tool software to calculate the percentage of residual material. Kolmogorov Smirnov and t tests were used to determine significant differences at P < .05. Results: no treatment completely removed the root filling material from the root canals. Analysis of the total area did not reveal statistical differences between the two groups (P>.05). Both groups also showed similar results in all tested thirds, with no statistical differences (P>.05). RS without solvent was faster in filling material removal than RS+C (P |
id |
ABO-1_6e0bc5cfbf9f609a5f163f8756617034 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/996 |
network_acronym_str |
ABO-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solventAvaliação comparativa da eficácia de um sistema alternativo de remoção de guta-percha com ou sem solventeDENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY)Endodontic retreatment; Reciprocating; Instrumentation; SolventsMEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)Retratamento endodôntico; Reciprocar; Instrumentação; SolventesObjective: to evaluate the efficacy of Reciproc System, with or without solvent for endodontic filling removal from oval shaped root canals. The time required for gutta-percha removal and the instrument fracture were also evaluated. Material and Methods: forty straight single-rooted premolars were prepared up to a size 30 and filled with gutta-percha and sealer, then randomly assigned to two retreatment groups (n = 20), treated with Reciproc System with or without chloroform (RS+C and RS). For all roots, procedural errors, time of retreatment and apically extruded material were recorded. After retreatment, roots were split longitudinally and then photographed. All images were evaluated with Image Tool software to calculate the percentage of residual material. Kolmogorov Smirnov and t tests were used to determine significant differences at P < .05. Results: no treatment completely removed the root filling material from the root canals. Analysis of the total area did not reveal statistical differences between the two groups (P>.05). Both groups also showed similar results in all tested thirds, with no statistical differences (P>.05). RS without solvent was faster in filling material removal than RS+C (PObjetivo: avaliar a eficácia do Sistema Reciproc, com ou sem solvente, para remoção do enchimento endodôntico de canais radiculares ovais. O tempo necessário para a remoção da guta-percha e a fratura do instrumento também foram avaliados. Material e Métodos: quarenta pré-molares unirradiculares retos foram confeccionados até o tamanho 30 e preenchidos com guta-percha e cimento, sendo aleatoriamente divididos em dois grupos de retratamento (n = 20), tratados com Sistema Reciproc com ou sem clorofórmio (RS + C e RS). Para todas as raízes, foram registrados erros de procedimento, tempo de retratamento e material apicalmente extrusado. Após o retratamento, as raízes foram divididas longitudinalmente e depois fotografadas. Todas as imagens foram avaliadas com o software Image Tool para calcular a porcentagem de material residual. Os testes de Kolmogorov Smirnov e t foram usados ??para determinar diferenças significativas em P 0,05). Ambos os grupos também mostraram resultados semelhantes em todos os terços testados, sem diferenças estatísticas (P> 0,05). O RS sem solvente foi mais rápido no preenchimento da remoção do material que o RS + C (P Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de JaneiroCarvalho, Nancy KudsiAlvares, Gustavo RibeiroSassone, Luciana MouraKrebs, Renato LiessCoutinho-Filho, Tauby SouzaSilva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da2017-09-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionOriginal ArticleArtigo originalapplication/pdfhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/99610.18363/rbo.v74n3.p.210Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 74, n. 3 (2017); 210Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 74, n. 3 (2017); 2101984-3747reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologiainstname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)instacron:ABOenghttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/996/644ContemporaryContemporâneaDireitos autorais 2017 Rev. Bras. Odontol.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-01-14T12:39:21Zoai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/996Revistahttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rboONGhttp://www.revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oaihttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai0034-72721984-3747opendoar:2019-01-14T12:39:21Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent Avaliação comparativa da eficácia de um sistema alternativo de remoção de guta-percha com ou sem solvente |
title |
A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent |
spellingShingle |
A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent Carvalho, Nancy Kudsi DENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY) Endodontic retreatment; Reciprocating; Instrumentation; Solvents MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA) Retratamento endodôntico; Reciprocar; Instrumentação; Solventes |
title_short |
A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent |
title_full |
A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent |
title_fullStr |
A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent |
title_sort |
A comparative evaluation of efficacy of a reciprocating system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent |
author |
Carvalho, Nancy Kudsi |
author_facet |
Carvalho, Nancy Kudsi Alvares, Gustavo Ribeiro Sassone, Luciana Moura Krebs, Renato Liess Coutinho-Filho, Tauby Souza Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alvares, Gustavo Ribeiro Sassone, Luciana Moura Krebs, Renato Liess Coutinho-Filho, Tauby Souza Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Carvalho, Nancy Kudsi Alvares, Gustavo Ribeiro Sassone, Luciana Moura Krebs, Renato Liess Coutinho-Filho, Tauby Souza Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
DENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY) Endodontic retreatment; Reciprocating; Instrumentation; Solvents MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA) Retratamento endodôntico; Reciprocar; Instrumentação; Solventes |
topic |
DENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY) Endodontic retreatment; Reciprocating; Instrumentation; Solvents MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA) Retratamento endodôntico; Reciprocar; Instrumentação; Solventes |
description |
Objective: to evaluate the efficacy of Reciproc System, with or without solvent for endodontic filling removal from oval shaped root canals. The time required for gutta-percha removal and the instrument fracture were also evaluated. Material and Methods: forty straight single-rooted premolars were prepared up to a size 30 and filled with gutta-percha and sealer, then randomly assigned to two retreatment groups (n = 20), treated with Reciproc System with or without chloroform (RS+C and RS). For all roots, procedural errors, time of retreatment and apically extruded material were recorded. After retreatment, roots were split longitudinally and then photographed. All images were evaluated with Image Tool software to calculate the percentage of residual material. Kolmogorov Smirnov and t tests were used to determine significant differences at P < .05. Results: no treatment completely removed the root filling material from the root canals. Analysis of the total area did not reveal statistical differences between the two groups (P>.05). Both groups also showed similar results in all tested thirds, with no statistical differences (P>.05). RS without solvent was faster in filling material removal than RS+C (P |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-09-25 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Original Article Artigo original |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/996 10.18363/rbo.v74n3.p.210 |
url |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/996 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18363/rbo.v74n3.p.210 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/996/644 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2017 Rev. Bras. Odontol. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2017 Rev. Bras. Odontol. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Contemporary Contemporânea |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 74, n. 3 (2017); 210 Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 74, n. 3 (2017); 210 1984-3747 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologia instname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO) instacron:ABO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO) |
instacron_str |
ABO |
institution |
ABO |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai |
_version_ |
1798313204368015360 |