Influence of Acid Etching on Bond Strength Between Feldspathic Ceramics and Resin Cement

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Jesus, Ricardo Huver de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Furlam, Bianca Colombi, Martinusse, Camila Maciel, Inácio, Hiorrana Carla Vasconcelos, Matos, Jefferson David Melo de, Nakano, Leonardo Jiro Nomura, Ortiz, Laura Patricia Nadal, Bottino, Marco Antonio, Maciel, Lucas Campagnaro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
Texto Completo: https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/1769
Resumo: Objective: analyze the influence of bond strength between resin cement and feldspathic ceramics using different concentrations and application times of hydrofluoric acid (HF). Materials and Methods: 18 feldspathic ceramic discs (Ø10mm - 2mm thickness) were made through the incremental technique, which were included in acrylic resin and regularized with silicon carbide sandpaper with granulations of 600, 1200 and 2000 through a polishing machine with a speed of 600 rpm. Soon after, they were immersed in distilled water for 10 minutes in an ultrasonic bath. All specimens were conditioned with HF and silanized. Four cement cylinders were made on each specimen (n=12), manufactured with Relyx ARC resin cement. After that, it was divided into six groups according to the surface treatment protocol: G1 (5% - 40s); G2 (5% - 60s); G3 (5% - 80s); G4 (10% - 40s); G5 (10% - 60s) e G6 (10% - 80s). The specimens were subjected to the Microshear Test, with vertical force at a speed of 0.5 mm min on the specimen. The microshear bond strength was calculated and expressed in Megapascal (MPa). The data were submitted to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons, with a significance level of 5%. Results: when the concentration of HF was analyzed, there were no statistical differences (p>0.05). In the comparison of application times, G3 (5% - 80s) and G6 (10% - 80s) obtained higher results of microshear resistance than the other groups. Conclusion: The different concentrations of HF did not influence the bond strength between feldspathic ceramics and resin cement. However, the increase in the time of HF conditioning affected in the bond strength.
id ABO-1_792df5fab9b1788d7e00d273d0a0e763
oai_identifier_str oai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/1769
network_acronym_str ABO-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of Acid Etching on Bond Strength Between Feldspathic Ceramics and Resin CementInfluência do Condicionamento Ácido na Resistência de União entre Cerâmica Feldspática e Cimento ResinosoDENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY)Ceramics; Resin Cements; Fluoridric Acid.MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)Cerâmica; Cimentos de Resina; Ácido FluorídricoObjective: analyze the influence of bond strength between resin cement and feldspathic ceramics using different concentrations and application times of hydrofluoric acid (HF). Materials and Methods: 18 feldspathic ceramic discs (Ø10mm - 2mm thickness) were made through the incremental technique, which were included in acrylic resin and regularized with silicon carbide sandpaper with granulations of 600, 1200 and 2000 through a polishing machine with a speed of 600 rpm. Soon after, they were immersed in distilled water for 10 minutes in an ultrasonic bath. All specimens were conditioned with HF and silanized. Four cement cylinders were made on each specimen (n=12), manufactured with Relyx ARC resin cement. After that, it was divided into six groups according to the surface treatment protocol: G1 (5% - 40s); G2 (5% - 60s); G3 (5% - 80s); G4 (10% - 40s); G5 (10% - 60s) e G6 (10% - 80s). The specimens were subjected to the Microshear Test, with vertical force at a speed of 0.5 mm min on the specimen. The microshear bond strength was calculated and expressed in Megapascal (MPa). The data were submitted to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons, with a significance level of 5%. Results: when the concentration of HF was analyzed, there were no statistical differences (p>0.05). In the comparison of application times, G3 (5% - 80s) and G6 (10% - 80s) obtained higher results of microshear resistance than the other groups. Conclusion: The different concentrations of HF did not influence the bond strength between feldspathic ceramics and resin cement. However, the increase in the time of HF conditioning affected in the bond strength.Objetivo: Analisar a influência da resistência de união entre cimento resinoso e cerâmica feldspática utilizando concentrações e tempos de aplicação diferentes de acído fluorídrico (HF). Material e Métodos: Foram confeccionados 18 discos de cerâmica feldspática (Ø10mm - 2mm de espessura) através da técnica incremental, que foram incluídos em resina acrílica e regularizados com lixas de carbeto de silício com granulações de 600, 1200 e 2000 através de uma máquina de polimento com velocidade de 600 rpm para regularização. Logo após foram mergulhadas em água destilada durante 10 minutos em cuba ultrassônica. Todos corpos de prova foram condicionados com HF e silanizados. Foram confeccionados quatro cilindros de cimento sobre cada corpo de prova (n=12), feitos com cimento resinoso Relyx ARC. Logo após, dividiu-se em seis grupos de acordo com o protocolo de tratamento de superfície: G1 (5% - 40s); G2 (5% - 60s); G3 (5% - 80s); G4 (10% - 40s); G5 (10% - 60s) e G6 (10% - 80s). Os corpos de prova foram submetidos ao Teste de Microcisalhamento, com força vertical a uma velocidade de 0,5 mm/min sobre a peça. A resistência de união ao microcisalhamento foi calculada e expressa em Megapascal (MPa). Os dados foram submetidos à análise de variância (ANOVA) dois fatores e para comparações múltiplas foi utilizado o Teste de Tukey, sendo o nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: Quando analisado a concentração do HF, não houve diferenças estatísticas (p>0,05). Na comparação dos tempos de aplicação, G3 (5% - 80s) e G6 (10% - 80s) obtiveram maiores resultados de resistência ao microcisalhamento que os demais grupos. Conclusão: As diferentes concentrações de HF não influenciaram na resistência de união entre cerâmica feldspática e cimento resinoso. Já o aumento do tempo de condicionamento com HF afetou na resistência de uniãoAssociação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de JaneiroJesus, Ricardo Huver deFurlam, Bianca ColombiMartinusse, Camila MacielInácio, Hiorrana Carla VasconcelosMatos, Jefferson David Melo deNakano, Leonardo Jiro NomuraOrtiz, Laura Patricia NadalBottino, Marco AntonioMaciel, Lucas Campagnaro2020-04-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionOriginal ArticleArtigo originalapplication/pdfhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/176910.18363/rbo.v77.2020.e1769Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 77 (2020); 1/5Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 77 (2020); 1/51984-3747reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologiainstname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)instacron:ABOenghttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/1769/pdfhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/downloadSuppFile/1769/1964https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/downloadSuppFile/1769/1968https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/downloadSuppFile/1769/1969Direitos autorais 2020 Rev. Bras. Odontol.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-12-23T17:40:46Zoai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/1769Revistahttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rboONGhttp://www.revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oaihttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai0034-72721984-3747opendoar:2020-12-23T17:40:46Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of Acid Etching on Bond Strength Between Feldspathic Ceramics and Resin Cement
Influência do Condicionamento Ácido na Resistência de União entre Cerâmica Feldspática e Cimento Resinoso
title Influence of Acid Etching on Bond Strength Between Feldspathic Ceramics and Resin Cement
spellingShingle Influence of Acid Etching on Bond Strength Between Feldspathic Ceramics and Resin Cement
Jesus, Ricardo Huver de
DENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY)
Ceramics; Resin Cements; Fluoridric Acid.
MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)
Cerâmica; Cimentos de Resina; Ácido Fluorídrico
title_short Influence of Acid Etching on Bond Strength Between Feldspathic Ceramics and Resin Cement
title_full Influence of Acid Etching on Bond Strength Between Feldspathic Ceramics and Resin Cement
title_fullStr Influence of Acid Etching on Bond Strength Between Feldspathic Ceramics and Resin Cement
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Acid Etching on Bond Strength Between Feldspathic Ceramics and Resin Cement
title_sort Influence of Acid Etching on Bond Strength Between Feldspathic Ceramics and Resin Cement
author Jesus, Ricardo Huver de
author_facet Jesus, Ricardo Huver de
Furlam, Bianca Colombi
Martinusse, Camila Maciel
Inácio, Hiorrana Carla Vasconcelos
Matos, Jefferson David Melo de
Nakano, Leonardo Jiro Nomura
Ortiz, Laura Patricia Nadal
Bottino, Marco Antonio
Maciel, Lucas Campagnaro
author_role author
author2 Furlam, Bianca Colombi
Martinusse, Camila Maciel
Inácio, Hiorrana Carla Vasconcelos
Matos, Jefferson David Melo de
Nakano, Leonardo Jiro Nomura
Ortiz, Laura Patricia Nadal
Bottino, Marco Antonio
Maciel, Lucas Campagnaro
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Jesus, Ricardo Huver de
Furlam, Bianca Colombi
Martinusse, Camila Maciel
Inácio, Hiorrana Carla Vasconcelos
Matos, Jefferson David Melo de
Nakano, Leonardo Jiro Nomura
Ortiz, Laura Patricia Nadal
Bottino, Marco Antonio
Maciel, Lucas Campagnaro
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv

dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv DENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY)
Ceramics; Resin Cements; Fluoridric Acid.
MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)
Cerâmica; Cimentos de Resina; Ácido Fluorídrico
topic DENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY)
Ceramics; Resin Cements; Fluoridric Acid.
MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)
Cerâmica; Cimentos de Resina; Ácido Fluorídrico
description Objective: analyze the influence of bond strength between resin cement and feldspathic ceramics using different concentrations and application times of hydrofluoric acid (HF). Materials and Methods: 18 feldspathic ceramic discs (Ø10mm - 2mm thickness) were made through the incremental technique, which were included in acrylic resin and regularized with silicon carbide sandpaper with granulations of 600, 1200 and 2000 through a polishing machine with a speed of 600 rpm. Soon after, they were immersed in distilled water for 10 minutes in an ultrasonic bath. All specimens were conditioned with HF and silanized. Four cement cylinders were made on each specimen (n=12), manufactured with Relyx ARC resin cement. After that, it was divided into six groups according to the surface treatment protocol: G1 (5% - 40s); G2 (5% - 60s); G3 (5% - 80s); G4 (10% - 40s); G5 (10% - 60s) e G6 (10% - 80s). The specimens were subjected to the Microshear Test, with vertical force at a speed of 0.5 mm min on the specimen. The microshear bond strength was calculated and expressed in Megapascal (MPa). The data were submitted to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons, with a significance level of 5%. Results: when the concentration of HF was analyzed, there were no statistical differences (p>0.05). In the comparison of application times, G3 (5% - 80s) and G6 (10% - 80s) obtained higher results of microshear resistance than the other groups. Conclusion: The different concentrations of HF did not influence the bond strength between feldspathic ceramics and resin cement. However, the increase in the time of HF conditioning affected in the bond strength.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Original Article
Artigo original
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/1769
10.18363/rbo.v77.2020.e1769
url https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/1769
identifier_str_mv 10.18363/rbo.v77.2020.e1769
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/1769/pdf
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/downloadSuppFile/1769/1964
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/downloadSuppFile/1769/1968
https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/downloadSuppFile/1769/1969
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2020 Rev. Bras. Odontol.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2020 Rev. Bras. Odontol.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv





dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 77 (2020); 1/5
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 77 (2020); 1/5
1984-3747
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
instname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
instacron:ABO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
instacron_str ABO
institution ABO
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
collection Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai
_version_ 1798313205696561152