Correlation of the diameter preparation of a new generation of NiTi instrument with the dimensions of gutta-percha points of its old generation through a morphometric analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Marja Ribeiro da Silva dos Santos
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Carvalho, Eduardo Paulo, Lunz, Jacqueline Silva Cardoso, Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da, Moreira, Edson Jorge Lima, Vieira, Victor Talarico Leal
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
Texto Completo: https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/717
Resumo: Objective: The aim of the present study was to verify if the Protaper Next instruments X1, X2, and X3 and the Protaper Universal gutta-percha cones F1, F2, and F3 meet the ANSI/ADA 101 and 78 recommendations. Material and Methods: The instruments’ dimensions were compared with those obtained by the gutta-percha cones. For this, ten instruments and ten cones of each type were used. Micromorphometric images were obtained and analyzed through a stereomicroscope (OptiCam) and measurements were obtained with TSView software, version 7.2.1.7. The D3, D6, and D9 diameters were compared with the nominal diameters using the Student's t-test. After this, the real diameters of the instruments D3, D6, and D9 were compared with the gutta-percha cone diameters by Anova supplemented with SNK test for multiple comparisons. A p ?0.05 was considered significant. Results: The results showed statistically significant differences between the real diameter and nominal diameter of the instruments (p
id ABO-1_858000b01ae5a2b0d8343c1cc07db92f
oai_identifier_str oai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/717
network_acronym_str ABO-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
repository_id_str
spelling Correlation of the diameter preparation of a new generation of NiTi instrument with the dimensions of gutta-percha points of its old generation through a morphometric analysisCorrelação do diâmetro do preparo de uma nova geração de instrumentos de NiTi com as dimensões de cones de guta-percha de sua antiga geração através de uma análise morfométricaNiTi instruments; Gutta-percha cones; Micromorphometric analysis.ODONTOLOGIA (ENDODONTIA)Instrumentos de NiTi; Cones de guta-percha; Análise micromorfométricaObjective: The aim of the present study was to verify if the Protaper Next instruments X1, X2, and X3 and the Protaper Universal gutta-percha cones F1, F2, and F3 meet the ANSI/ADA 101 and 78 recommendations. Material and Methods: The instruments’ dimensions were compared with those obtained by the gutta-percha cones. For this, ten instruments and ten cones of each type were used. Micromorphometric images were obtained and analyzed through a stereomicroscope (OptiCam) and measurements were obtained with TSView software, version 7.2.1.7. The D3, D6, and D9 diameters were compared with the nominal diameters using the Student's t-test. After this, the real diameters of the instruments D3, D6, and D9 were compared with the gutta-percha cone diameters by Anova supplemented with SNK test for multiple comparisons. A p ?0.05 was considered significant. Results: The results showed statistically significant differences between the real diameter and nominal diameter of the instruments (p Objetivo: O presente trabalho teve o objetivo de determinar as dimensões e verificar se os instrumentos X1, X2 e X3 atendem as recomendações da norma ANSI/ADA nº 101 e se os cones de guta-percha F1, F2 e F3 atendem a norma ANSI/ADA nº 78. Material e Métodos: Os resultados dos instrumentos foram comparados com as dimensões dos cones de guta-percha. Foram utilizados 10 instrumentos e 10 cones de cada tipo. As imagens para análise micromorfométrica foram obtidas com uma lupa Opticam e as medidas determinadas com o software TSView versão 7.2.1.7. Os diâmetros em D3, D6 e D9 reais foram comparados com os nominais pelo teste t-student. Os diâmetros dos instrumentos em D3, D6 e D9 foram comparados com os dos cones pelo teste Anova e complementados com teste de comparações múltiplas SNK. Todos os testes adotaram nível de significância ?=5%. Resultados: Os resultados obtidos mostraram que há diferença estatisticamente significante entre as dimensões reais e nominais dos instrumentos (p < 0,05). O instrumento X3 apresentou diferença estatisticamente significante em relação ao cone F1 (p < 0,05), onde os valores do cone são menores do que os dos instrumentos. Conclusão: Dentro das limitações deste estudo pôde-se concluir que: os instrumentos X1 e os cones de guta-percha não atenderam as recomendações de suas normas. O cone F1 pode ser uma opção para obturação dos canais modelados com o instrumento X3, porém a termoplastificação se faz necessária.Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de JaneiroOliveira, Marja Ribeiro da Silva dos SantosCarvalho, Eduardo PauloLunz, Jacqueline Silva CardosoSilva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal daMoreira, Edson Jorge LimaVieira, Victor Talarico Leal2016-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/71710.18363/rbo.v73n3.p.180Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 73, n. 3 (2016); 180Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 73, n. 3 (2016); 1801984-3747reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologiainstname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)instacron:ABOporhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/717/538Rio de Janeiro; Brasil; América LatinaDireitos autorais 2016 Revistashttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-09-30T12:55:31Zoai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/717Revistahttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rboONGhttp://www.revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oaihttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai0034-72721984-3747opendoar:2016-09-30T12:55:31Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Correlation of the diameter preparation of a new generation of NiTi instrument with the dimensions of gutta-percha points of its old generation through a morphometric analysis
Correlação do diâmetro do preparo de uma nova geração de instrumentos de NiTi com as dimensões de cones de guta-percha de sua antiga geração através de uma análise morfométrica
title Correlation of the diameter preparation of a new generation of NiTi instrument with the dimensions of gutta-percha points of its old generation through a morphometric analysis
spellingShingle Correlation of the diameter preparation of a new generation of NiTi instrument with the dimensions of gutta-percha points of its old generation through a morphometric analysis
Oliveira, Marja Ribeiro da Silva dos Santos
NiTi instruments; Gutta-percha cones; Micromorphometric analysis.
ODONTOLOGIA (ENDODONTIA)
Instrumentos de NiTi; Cones de guta-percha; Análise micromorfométrica
title_short Correlation of the diameter preparation of a new generation of NiTi instrument with the dimensions of gutta-percha points of its old generation through a morphometric analysis
title_full Correlation of the diameter preparation of a new generation of NiTi instrument with the dimensions of gutta-percha points of its old generation through a morphometric analysis
title_fullStr Correlation of the diameter preparation of a new generation of NiTi instrument with the dimensions of gutta-percha points of its old generation through a morphometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed Correlation of the diameter preparation of a new generation of NiTi instrument with the dimensions of gutta-percha points of its old generation through a morphometric analysis
title_sort Correlation of the diameter preparation of a new generation of NiTi instrument with the dimensions of gutta-percha points of its old generation through a morphometric analysis
author Oliveira, Marja Ribeiro da Silva dos Santos
author_facet Oliveira, Marja Ribeiro da Silva dos Santos
Carvalho, Eduardo Paulo
Lunz, Jacqueline Silva Cardoso
Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da
Moreira, Edson Jorge Lima
Vieira, Victor Talarico Leal
author_role author
author2 Carvalho, Eduardo Paulo
Lunz, Jacqueline Silva Cardoso
Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da
Moreira, Edson Jorge Lima
Vieira, Victor Talarico Leal
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Marja Ribeiro da Silva dos Santos
Carvalho, Eduardo Paulo
Lunz, Jacqueline Silva Cardoso
Silva, Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal da
Moreira, Edson Jorge Lima
Vieira, Victor Talarico Leal
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv


dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv NiTi instruments; Gutta-percha cones; Micromorphometric analysis.
ODONTOLOGIA (ENDODONTIA)
Instrumentos de NiTi; Cones de guta-percha; Análise micromorfométrica
topic NiTi instruments; Gutta-percha cones; Micromorphometric analysis.
ODONTOLOGIA (ENDODONTIA)
Instrumentos de NiTi; Cones de guta-percha; Análise micromorfométrica
description Objective: The aim of the present study was to verify if the Protaper Next instruments X1, X2, and X3 and the Protaper Universal gutta-percha cones F1, F2, and F3 meet the ANSI/ADA 101 and 78 recommendations. Material and Methods: The instruments’ dimensions were compared with those obtained by the gutta-percha cones. For this, ten instruments and ten cones of each type were used. Micromorphometric images were obtained and analyzed through a stereomicroscope (OptiCam) and measurements were obtained with TSView software, version 7.2.1.7. The D3, D6, and D9 diameters were compared with the nominal diameters using the Student's t-test. After this, the real diameters of the instruments D3, D6, and D9 were compared with the gutta-percha cone diameters by Anova supplemented with SNK test for multiple comparisons. A p ?0.05 was considered significant. Results: The results showed statistically significant differences between the real diameter and nominal diameter of the instruments (p
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-30
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv



dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/717
10.18363/rbo.v73n3.p.180
url https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/717
identifier_str_mv 10.18363/rbo.v73n3.p.180
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/717/538
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revistas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revistas
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv


Rio de Janeiro; Brasil; América Latina
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 73, n. 3 (2016); 180
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 73, n. 3 (2016); 180
1984-3747
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
instname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
instacron:ABO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
instacron_str ABO
institution ABO
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
collection Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai
_version_ 1798313203902447616

Registros relacionados