A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month randomized multi-center clinical trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Albuquerque, Elisa Gomes de
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Santana, Flavio Warol Klen, Calazans, Fernanda Signorelli, Poubel, Luiz Augusto, Marins, Stella Soares, Matos, Thalita de Paris, Hanzen, Taíse Alessandra, Barceleiro, Marcos de Oliveira, Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
Texto Completo: https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/999
Resumo: The objective of this multi-centric, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical performance of a new universal adhesive system (Futurabond U, Voco GbmH, Germany) when applied with different application strategies over a period of six months. For this, 200 restorations were performed on non-carious cervical lesions using the adhesive Futurabond U in the four adhesive strategies (n=50 per group): self-etch without previous conditioner (SEE); self-etch associated with selective enamel etching (SET); etch-and-rinse with dry dentin (ERDry) and; etch-and-rinse with wet dentin (ERWet). After the use of the adhesive system, the cavities were restored with Admira Fusion composite resin (Voco GmbH). After 6 months of clinical performance, these restorations were evaluated according to FDI criteria in the following items: retention/fracture, marginal adaptation, marginal staining, postoperative sensitivity and caries recurrence. Seven restorations were lost/fractured after six months of clinical evaluation (2 in the SEE group, 1 in the SET group, 1 in the ERDry group, and 3 in the ERWet group). The retention rates for six months (95% confidence interval) were 96% (86%-98%) for the SEE group, 98% (89%-99%) for the SET group, 98% (89%-99%) for the ERDry group and 94% (83%-97%) for the ERWet group, with no statistical difference identified between any pair of groups (p> 0.05). Twenty-four restorations presented small marginal adaptation defects at the six-months evaluation recall, and all of them were considered clinically acceptable. The clinical performance of the universal adhesive Futurabond U associated to Admira Fusion unidoses resin composite was found to be promise after 6-month of clinical evaluation when applied in noncarious cervical lesions and it was not depending on the bonding strategy employed.
id ABO-1_c63eba7bcb838db8eb8a7637df81c205
oai_identifier_str oai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/999
network_acronym_str ABO-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
repository_id_str
spelling A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month randomized multi-center clinical trialUm novo adesivo universal simplificado: ensaio clínico multicêntrico randomizado de 6 mesesDENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY)Adhesion; Acid etching; Composite restorationMEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)Técnicas adesivas; Auto-gravura; Restaurações dentárias; Longevidade clínicaThe objective of this multi-centric, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical performance of a new universal adhesive system (Futurabond U, Voco GbmH, Germany) when applied with different application strategies over a period of six months. For this, 200 restorations were performed on non-carious cervical lesions using the adhesive Futurabond U in the four adhesive strategies (n=50 per group): self-etch without previous conditioner (SEE); self-etch associated with selective enamel etching (SET); etch-and-rinse with dry dentin (ERDry) and; etch-and-rinse with wet dentin (ERWet). After the use of the adhesive system, the cavities were restored with Admira Fusion composite resin (Voco GmbH). After 6 months of clinical performance, these restorations were evaluated according to FDI criteria in the following items: retention/fracture, marginal adaptation, marginal staining, postoperative sensitivity and caries recurrence. Seven restorations were lost/fractured after six months of clinical evaluation (2 in the SEE group, 1 in the SET group, 1 in the ERDry group, and 3 in the ERWet group). The retention rates for six months (95% confidence interval) were 96% (86%-98%) for the SEE group, 98% (89%-99%) for the SET group, 98% (89%-99%) for the ERDry group and 94% (83%-97%) for the ERWet group, with no statistical difference identified between any pair of groups (p> 0.05). Twenty-four restorations presented small marginal adaptation defects at the six-months evaluation recall, and all of them were considered clinically acceptable. The clinical performance of the universal adhesive Futurabond U associated to Admira Fusion unidoses resin composite was found to be promise after 6-month of clinical evaluation when applied in noncarious cervical lesions and it was not depending on the bonding strategy employed.Objetivo: o objetivo deste ensaio clínico randomizado, duplo-cego e multicêntrico foi avaliar o desempenho clínico de um novo sistema adesivo universal (Futurabond U, Voco GbmH, Alemanha) quando aplicado com diferentes estratégias de aplicação durante um período de seis meses. Material e Métodos: para isso, foram realizadas 200 restaurações em lesões cervicais não cariosas, utilizando o adesivo Futurabond U de acordo com quatro estratégias adesivas (n = 50 por grupo): autocondicionante sem condicionador prévio (SEE); autocondicionante associado ao condicionamento seletivo do esmalte (SET); etch-and-enxaguar com dentina seca (ERDry) e; etch-and-enxaguar com dentina úmida (ERWet). Após a hibridização, as cavidades foram restauradas usando resina composta Admira Fusion (Voco GmbH). Após 6 meses de desempenho clínico, essas restaurações foram avaliadas de acordo com os critérios do IDE nos seguintes itens: retenção / fratura, adaptação marginal, coloração marginal, sensibilidade pós-operatória e recorrência de cárie. Resultados: sete restaurações foram perdidas / fraturadas após seis meses de avaliação clínica (2 no grupo SEE, 1 no grupo SET, 1 no grupo ERDry e 3 no grupo ERWet). As taxas de retenção por seis meses (intervalo de confiança de 95%) foram 96% (86% -98%) para o grupo SEE, 98% (89% -99%) para o grupo SET, 98% (89% -99%) para o grupo ERDry e 94% (83% -97%) para o grupo ERWet, sem diferença estatística identificada entre qualquer par de grupos (p> 0,05). Vinte e quatro restaurações apresentaram pequenos defeitos de adaptação marginal no recordatório de avaliação de seis meses, e todas foram consideradas clinicamente aceitáveis. Conclusão: o desempenho clínico do adesivo universal Futurabond U associado ao composto de resina unidoses Admira Fusion foi promissor após 6 meses de avaliação clínica quando aplicado em lesões cervicais não cariosas e não dependeu da estratégia de colagem empregada.Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de JaneiroAlbuquerque, Elisa Gomes deSantana, Flavio Warol KlenCalazans, Fernanda SignorelliPoubel, Luiz AugustoMarins, Stella SoaresMatos, Thalita de ParisHanzen, Taíse AlessandraBarceleiro, Marcos de OliveiraLoguercio, Alessandro Dourado2017-12-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionOriginal ArticleArtigo originalapplication/pdfhttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/99910.18363/rbo.v74n4.p.251Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 74, n. 4 (2017); 251Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 74, n. 4 (2017); 2511984-3747reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologiainstname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)instacron:ABOenghttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/999/657Direitos autorais 2017 Rev. Bras. Odontol.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-01-04T14:20:53Zoai:revista_aborj_org_br.www.revista.aborj.org.br:article/999Revistahttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rboONGhttp://www.revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oaihttps://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai0034-72721984-3747opendoar:2019-01-04T14:20:53Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month randomized multi-center clinical trial
Um novo adesivo universal simplificado: ensaio clínico multicêntrico randomizado de 6 meses
title A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month randomized multi-center clinical trial
spellingShingle A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month randomized multi-center clinical trial
Albuquerque, Elisa Gomes de
DENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY)
Adhesion; Acid etching; Composite restoration
MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)
Técnicas adesivas; Auto-gravura; Restaurações dentárias; Longevidade clínica
title_short A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month randomized multi-center clinical trial
title_full A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month randomized multi-center clinical trial
title_fullStr A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month randomized multi-center clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month randomized multi-center clinical trial
title_sort A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month randomized multi-center clinical trial
author Albuquerque, Elisa Gomes de
author_facet Albuquerque, Elisa Gomes de
Santana, Flavio Warol Klen
Calazans, Fernanda Signorelli
Poubel, Luiz Augusto
Marins, Stella Soares
Matos, Thalita de Paris
Hanzen, Taíse Alessandra
Barceleiro, Marcos de Oliveira
Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado
author_role author
author2 Santana, Flavio Warol Klen
Calazans, Fernanda Signorelli
Poubel, Luiz Augusto
Marins, Stella Soares
Matos, Thalita de Paris
Hanzen, Taíse Alessandra
Barceleiro, Marcos de Oliveira
Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Albuquerque, Elisa Gomes de
Santana, Flavio Warol Klen
Calazans, Fernanda Signorelli
Poubel, Luiz Augusto
Marins, Stella Soares
Matos, Thalita de Paris
Hanzen, Taíse Alessandra
Barceleiro, Marcos de Oliveira
Loguercio, Alessandro Dourado
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv

dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv DENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY)
Adhesion; Acid etching; Composite restoration
MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)
Técnicas adesivas; Auto-gravura; Restaurações dentárias; Longevidade clínica
topic DENTAL MEDICINE (DENTISTRY)
Adhesion; Acid etching; Composite restoration
MEDICINA DENTÁRIA (ODONTOLOGIA)
Técnicas adesivas; Auto-gravura; Restaurações dentárias; Longevidade clínica
description The objective of this multi-centric, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical performance of a new universal adhesive system (Futurabond U, Voco GbmH, Germany) when applied with different application strategies over a period of six months. For this, 200 restorations were performed on non-carious cervical lesions using the adhesive Futurabond U in the four adhesive strategies (n=50 per group): self-etch without previous conditioner (SEE); self-etch associated with selective enamel etching (SET); etch-and-rinse with dry dentin (ERDry) and; etch-and-rinse with wet dentin (ERWet). After the use of the adhesive system, the cavities were restored with Admira Fusion composite resin (Voco GmbH). After 6 months of clinical performance, these restorations were evaluated according to FDI criteria in the following items: retention/fracture, marginal adaptation, marginal staining, postoperative sensitivity and caries recurrence. Seven restorations were lost/fractured after six months of clinical evaluation (2 in the SEE group, 1 in the SET group, 1 in the ERDry group, and 3 in the ERWet group). The retention rates for six months (95% confidence interval) were 96% (86%-98%) for the SEE group, 98% (89%-99%) for the SET group, 98% (89%-99%) for the ERDry group and 94% (83%-97%) for the ERWet group, with no statistical difference identified between any pair of groups (p> 0.05). Twenty-four restorations presented small marginal adaptation defects at the six-months evaluation recall, and all of them were considered clinically acceptable. The clinical performance of the universal adhesive Futurabond U associated to Admira Fusion unidoses resin composite was found to be promise after 6-month of clinical evaluation when applied in noncarious cervical lesions and it was not depending on the bonding strategy employed.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-27
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv

dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Original Article
Artigo original
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/999
10.18363/rbo.v74n4.p.251
url https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/999
identifier_str_mv 10.18363/rbo.v74n4.p.251
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/article/view/999/657
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2017 Rev. Bras. Odontol.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2017 Rev. Bras. Odontol.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv





dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Odontologia - Seção Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 74, n. 4 (2017); 251
Revista Brasileira de Odontologia; v. 74, n. 4 (2017); 251
1984-3747
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
instname:Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
instacron:ABO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
instacron_str ABO
institution ABO
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
collection Revista Brasileira de Odontologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Odontologia - Associação Brasileira de Odontologia (ABO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv https://revista.aborj.org.br/index.php/rbo/oai
_version_ 1798313204922712064