A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462022000500532 |
Resumo: | Objective: Naturalistic and neurophysiological assessments are relevant as outcome measures in autism intervention trials because they provide, respectively, ecologically valid information about functioning and underlying neurocognitive mechanisms. We conducted a systematic review to highlight which specific neurophysiological techniques, experimental tasks, and naturalistic protocols have been used to assess neural and behavioral functioning in autism intervention studies. Methods: Studies were collected from four electronic databases between October 2019 and February 2020: MEDLINE (via PubMed), PsycINFO, LILACS, and Web of Science, and were included if they used structured observational, naturalistic, or neurophysiological measures to assess the efficacy of a nonpharmacological intervention for ASD. Results: Fourteen different measures were used by 64 studies, with the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule the most frequently used instrument. Thirty-seven different coding systems of naturalistic measures were used across 51 studies, most of which used different protocols. Twenty-four neurophysiological measures were used in 16 studies, with different experimental paradigms and neurophysiological components used across studies. Conclusions: Cross-study variability in assessing the outcomes of autism interventions may obscure comparisons and conclusions about how different behavioral interventions affect autistic social communication and underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. |
id |
ABP-1_3efc0bfa9c190bfe5109839e5562b532 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1516-44462022000500532 |
network_acronym_str |
ABP-1 |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autismAutisminterventionoutcome measuresneurophysiologynaturalistic assessments Objective: Naturalistic and neurophysiological assessments are relevant as outcome measures in autism intervention trials because they provide, respectively, ecologically valid information about functioning and underlying neurocognitive mechanisms. We conducted a systematic review to highlight which specific neurophysiological techniques, experimental tasks, and naturalistic protocols have been used to assess neural and behavioral functioning in autism intervention studies. Methods: Studies were collected from four electronic databases between October 2019 and February 2020: MEDLINE (via PubMed), PsycINFO, LILACS, and Web of Science, and were included if they used structured observational, naturalistic, or neurophysiological measures to assess the efficacy of a nonpharmacological intervention for ASD. Results: Fourteen different measures were used by 64 studies, with the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule the most frequently used instrument. Thirty-seven different coding systems of naturalistic measures were used across 51 studies, most of which used different protocols. Twenty-four neurophysiological measures were used in 16 studies, with different experimental paradigms and neurophysiological components used across studies. Conclusions: Cross-study variability in assessing the outcomes of autism interventions may obscure comparisons and conclusions about how different behavioral interventions affect autistic social communication and underlying neurophysiological mechanisms.Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria2022-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462022000500532Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.44 n.5 2022reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)instacron:ABP10.47626/1516-4446-2021-2222info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGodoy,Priscilla Brandi GomesSumiya,Fernando MitsuoSeda,LeonardoShephard,Elizabetheng2022-10-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-44462022000500532Revistahttp://www.bjp.org.br/ahead_of_print.asphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br1809-452X1516-4446opendoar:2022-10-19T00:00Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism |
title |
A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism |
spellingShingle |
A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism Godoy,Priscilla Brandi Gomes Autism intervention outcome measures neurophysiology naturalistic assessments |
title_short |
A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism |
title_full |
A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism |
title_fullStr |
A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism |
title_full_unstemmed |
A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism |
title_sort |
A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism |
author |
Godoy,Priscilla Brandi Gomes |
author_facet |
Godoy,Priscilla Brandi Gomes Sumiya,Fernando Mitsuo Seda,Leonardo Shephard,Elizabeth |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sumiya,Fernando Mitsuo Seda,Leonardo Shephard,Elizabeth |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Godoy,Priscilla Brandi Gomes Sumiya,Fernando Mitsuo Seda,Leonardo Shephard,Elizabeth |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Autism intervention outcome measures neurophysiology naturalistic assessments |
topic |
Autism intervention outcome measures neurophysiology naturalistic assessments |
description |
Objective: Naturalistic and neurophysiological assessments are relevant as outcome measures in autism intervention trials because they provide, respectively, ecologically valid information about functioning and underlying neurocognitive mechanisms. We conducted a systematic review to highlight which specific neurophysiological techniques, experimental tasks, and naturalistic protocols have been used to assess neural and behavioral functioning in autism intervention studies. Methods: Studies were collected from four electronic databases between October 2019 and February 2020: MEDLINE (via PubMed), PsycINFO, LILACS, and Web of Science, and were included if they used structured observational, naturalistic, or neurophysiological measures to assess the efficacy of a nonpharmacological intervention for ASD. Results: Fourteen different measures were used by 64 studies, with the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule the most frequently used instrument. Thirty-seven different coding systems of naturalistic measures were used across 51 studies, most of which used different protocols. Twenty-four neurophysiological measures were used in 16 studies, with different experimental paradigms and neurophysiological components used across studies. Conclusions: Cross-study variability in assessing the outcomes of autism interventions may obscure comparisons and conclusions about how different behavioral interventions affect autistic social communication and underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462022000500532 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462022000500532 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.47626/1516-4446-2021-2222 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.44 n.5 2022 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP) instacron:ABP |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP) |
instacron_str |
ABP |
institution |
ABP |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br |
_version_ |
1754212560900456448 |