A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Godoy,Priscilla Brandi Gomes
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Sumiya,Fernando Mitsuo, Seda,Leonardo, Shephard,Elizabeth
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462022000500532
Resumo: Objective: Naturalistic and neurophysiological assessments are relevant as outcome measures in autism intervention trials because they provide, respectively, ecologically valid information about functioning and underlying neurocognitive mechanisms. We conducted a systematic review to highlight which specific neurophysiological techniques, experimental tasks, and naturalistic protocols have been used to assess neural and behavioral functioning in autism intervention studies. Methods: Studies were collected from four electronic databases between October 2019 and February 2020: MEDLINE (via PubMed), PsycINFO, LILACS, and Web of Science, and were included if they used structured observational, naturalistic, or neurophysiological measures to assess the efficacy of a nonpharmacological intervention for ASD. Results: Fourteen different measures were used by 64 studies, with the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule the most frequently used instrument. Thirty-seven different coding systems of naturalistic measures were used across 51 studies, most of which used different protocols. Twenty-four neurophysiological measures were used in 16 studies, with different experimental paradigms and neurophysiological components used across studies. Conclusions: Cross-study variability in assessing the outcomes of autism interventions may obscure comparisons and conclusions about how different behavioral interventions affect autistic social communication and underlying neurophysiological mechanisms.
id ABP-1_3efc0bfa9c190bfe5109839e5562b532
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1516-44462022000500532
network_acronym_str ABP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autismAutisminterventionoutcome measuresneurophysiologynaturalistic assessments Objective: Naturalistic and neurophysiological assessments are relevant as outcome measures in autism intervention trials because they provide, respectively, ecologically valid information about functioning and underlying neurocognitive mechanisms. We conducted a systematic review to highlight which specific neurophysiological techniques, experimental tasks, and naturalistic protocols have been used to assess neural and behavioral functioning in autism intervention studies. Methods: Studies were collected from four electronic databases between October 2019 and February 2020: MEDLINE (via PubMed), PsycINFO, LILACS, and Web of Science, and were included if they used structured observational, naturalistic, or neurophysiological measures to assess the efficacy of a nonpharmacological intervention for ASD. Results: Fourteen different measures were used by 64 studies, with the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule the most frequently used instrument. Thirty-seven different coding systems of naturalistic measures were used across 51 studies, most of which used different protocols. Twenty-four neurophysiological measures were used in 16 studies, with different experimental paradigms and neurophysiological components used across studies. Conclusions: Cross-study variability in assessing the outcomes of autism interventions may obscure comparisons and conclusions about how different behavioral interventions affect autistic social communication and underlying neurophysiological mechanisms.Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria2022-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462022000500532Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.44 n.5 2022reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)instacron:ABP10.47626/1516-4446-2021-2222info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGodoy,Priscilla Brandi GomesSumiya,Fernando MitsuoSeda,LeonardoShephard,Elizabetheng2022-10-19T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1516-44462022000500532Revistahttp://www.bjp.org.br/ahead_of_print.asphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br1809-452X1516-4446opendoar:2022-10-19T00:00Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism
title A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism
spellingShingle A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism
Godoy,Priscilla Brandi Gomes
Autism
intervention
outcome measures
neurophysiology
naturalistic assessments
title_short A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism
title_full A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism
title_fullStr A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism
title_sort A systematic review of observational, naturalistic, and neurophysiological outcome measures of nonpharmacological interventions for autism
author Godoy,Priscilla Brandi Gomes
author_facet Godoy,Priscilla Brandi Gomes
Sumiya,Fernando Mitsuo
Seda,Leonardo
Shephard,Elizabeth
author_role author
author2 Sumiya,Fernando Mitsuo
Seda,Leonardo
Shephard,Elizabeth
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Godoy,Priscilla Brandi Gomes
Sumiya,Fernando Mitsuo
Seda,Leonardo
Shephard,Elizabeth
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Autism
intervention
outcome measures
neurophysiology
naturalistic assessments
topic Autism
intervention
outcome measures
neurophysiology
naturalistic assessments
description Objective: Naturalistic and neurophysiological assessments are relevant as outcome measures in autism intervention trials because they provide, respectively, ecologically valid information about functioning and underlying neurocognitive mechanisms. We conducted a systematic review to highlight which specific neurophysiological techniques, experimental tasks, and naturalistic protocols have been used to assess neural and behavioral functioning in autism intervention studies. Methods: Studies were collected from four electronic databases between October 2019 and February 2020: MEDLINE (via PubMed), PsycINFO, LILACS, and Web of Science, and were included if they used structured observational, naturalistic, or neurophysiological measures to assess the efficacy of a nonpharmacological intervention for ASD. Results: Fourteen different measures were used by 64 studies, with the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule the most frequently used instrument. Thirty-seven different coding systems of naturalistic measures were used across 51 studies, most of which used different protocols. Twenty-four neurophysiological measures were used in 16 studies, with different experimental paradigms and neurophysiological components used across studies. Conclusions: Cross-study variability in assessing the outcomes of autism interventions may obscure comparisons and conclusions about how different behavioral interventions affect autistic social communication and underlying neurophysiological mechanisms.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462022000500532
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462022000500532
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.47626/1516-4446-2021-2222
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry v.44 n.5 2022
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
instacron:ABP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
instacron_str ABP
institution ABP
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry (São Paulo. 1999. Online) - Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbp@abpbrasil.org.br
_version_ 1754212560900456448