Civic culture and public sphere: comparative study on the conversation in the VotenaWeb and ISideWith portals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rothberg, Danilo
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Berti, Pedro Luis Bueno
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Compolítica
Texto Completo: https://revista.compolitica.org/index.php/revista/article/view/227
Resumo: The research presented in this article was carried out with the goal of investigating, from a comparative perspective, the quality of the online conversation in two deliberative digital environments, in different countries: the web portals Votenaweb.com.br (Brazil) and ISideWith.com (United States), which have the potential of encouraging relations of proximity between the general public and formal political institutions, allowing the expression of opinions on bills and legislative matters in general through symbolic votes. In total, 30.192 comments were collected and analyzed. Content analysis was performed in five categories, based on literature, namely: justification; reciprocity; reflexivity; respect; and information. The results indicate remarkable similarities between the two environments studied, but also important differences, which might be anchored in cultural characteristics.
id ABPCP-2_cc41f65ce328a8da1dd095d6d99c530d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.compolitica.ojsbrasil.com.br:article/227
network_acronym_str ABPCP-2
network_name_str Revista Compolítica
repository_id_str
spelling Civic culture and public sphere: comparative study on the conversation in the VotenaWeb and ISideWith portalsCultura cívica e esfera pública: estudo comparado de conversação política nos portais VotenaWeb e ISideWithCidadaniaEsfera PúblicaConversação on-linecitizenshippublic sphereonline conversationThe research presented in this article was carried out with the goal of investigating, from a comparative perspective, the quality of the online conversation in two deliberative digital environments, in different countries: the web portals Votenaweb.com.br (Brazil) and ISideWith.com (United States), which have the potential of encouraging relations of proximity between the general public and formal political institutions, allowing the expression of opinions on bills and legislative matters in general through symbolic votes. In total, 30.192 comments were collected and analyzed. Content analysis was performed in five categories, based on literature, namely: justification; reciprocity; reflexivity; respect; and information. The results indicate remarkable similarities between the two environments studied, but also important differences, which might be anchored in cultural characteristics.A pesquisa apresentada neste artigo foi realizada com o objetivo de conhecer, em perspectiva comparada, a qualidade da conversação online em dois ambientes digitais deliberativos, em países diferentes: os portais Votenaweb.com.br (Brasil) e ISideWith.com (Estados Unidos), que têm o potencial de incentivar a aproximação entre o público em geral e as instituições políticas formais, ao permitirem a expressão de opiniões sobre projetos de lei e temas legislativos em geral através de votos simbólicos. No total, foram coletados e analisados 30.192 comentários. A análise de conteúdo foi realizada em cinco categorias construídas com base na literatura especializada, a saber: justificação; reciprocidade; reflexividade; respeito; informação. Os resultados indicam similaridades notáveis entre os dois ambientes estudados, mas também diferenças importantes, que podem estar ancoradas em características culturais.Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política2019-09-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.compolitica.org/index.php/revista/article/view/22710.21878/compolitica.2019.9.2.227Compolítica; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2019): Revista Compolitica; 05-36Compolítica; v. 9 n. 2 (2019): Revista Compolitica; 05-362236-478110.21878/compolitica.2019.9.2reponame:Revista Compolíticainstname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (Compolítica)instacron:ABPCPporhttps://revista.compolitica.org/index.php/revista/article/view/227/237Copyright (c) 2019 Danilo Rothberg, Pedro Luis Bueno Bertiinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRothberg, DaniloBerti, Pedro Luis Bueno2021-07-13T04:58:33Zoai:ojs2.compolitica.ojsbrasil.com.br:article/227RevistaONGhttp://compolitica.org/revista/index.php/revista/oairevista@compolitica.org2236-47812236-4781opendoar:2021-07-13T04:58:33Revista Compolítica - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (Compolítica)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Civic culture and public sphere: comparative study on the conversation in the VotenaWeb and ISideWith portals
Cultura cívica e esfera pública: estudo comparado de conversação política nos portais VotenaWeb e ISideWith
title Civic culture and public sphere: comparative study on the conversation in the VotenaWeb and ISideWith portals
spellingShingle Civic culture and public sphere: comparative study on the conversation in the VotenaWeb and ISideWith portals
Rothberg, Danilo
Cidadania
Esfera Pública
Conversação on-line
citizenship
public sphere
online conversation
title_short Civic culture and public sphere: comparative study on the conversation in the VotenaWeb and ISideWith portals
title_full Civic culture and public sphere: comparative study on the conversation in the VotenaWeb and ISideWith portals
title_fullStr Civic culture and public sphere: comparative study on the conversation in the VotenaWeb and ISideWith portals
title_full_unstemmed Civic culture and public sphere: comparative study on the conversation in the VotenaWeb and ISideWith portals
title_sort Civic culture and public sphere: comparative study on the conversation in the VotenaWeb and ISideWith portals
author Rothberg, Danilo
author_facet Rothberg, Danilo
Berti, Pedro Luis Bueno
author_role author
author2 Berti, Pedro Luis Bueno
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rothberg, Danilo
Berti, Pedro Luis Bueno
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cidadania
Esfera Pública
Conversação on-line
citizenship
public sphere
online conversation
topic Cidadania
Esfera Pública
Conversação on-line
citizenship
public sphere
online conversation
description The research presented in this article was carried out with the goal of investigating, from a comparative perspective, the quality of the online conversation in two deliberative digital environments, in different countries: the web portals Votenaweb.com.br (Brazil) and ISideWith.com (United States), which have the potential of encouraging relations of proximity between the general public and formal political institutions, allowing the expression of opinions on bills and legislative matters in general through symbolic votes. In total, 30.192 comments were collected and analyzed. Content analysis was performed in five categories, based on literature, namely: justification; reciprocity; reflexivity; respect; and information. The results indicate remarkable similarities between the two environments studied, but also important differences, which might be anchored in cultural characteristics.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.compolitica.org/index.php/revista/article/view/227
10.21878/compolitica.2019.9.2.227
url https://revista.compolitica.org/index.php/revista/article/view/227
identifier_str_mv 10.21878/compolitica.2019.9.2.227
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.compolitica.org/index.php/revista/article/view/227/237
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Danilo Rothberg, Pedro Luis Bueno Berti
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Danilo Rothberg, Pedro Luis Bueno Berti
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Compolítica; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2019): Revista Compolitica; 05-36
Compolítica; v. 9 n. 2 (2019): Revista Compolitica; 05-36
2236-4781
10.21878/compolitica.2019.9.2
reponame:Revista Compolítica
instname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (Compolítica)
instacron:ABPCP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (Compolítica)
instacron_str ABPCP
institution ABPCP
reponame_str Revista Compolítica
collection Revista Compolítica
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Compolítica - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (Compolítica)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista@compolitica.org
_version_ 1797049677317668864

Registros relacionados