Neural mobilization and static stretching in an experimental sciatica model: an experimental study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bertolini,Gladson R. F.
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Silva,Taciane S., Trindade,Danilo L., Ciena,Adriano P., Carvalho,Alberito R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552009000600005
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To verify the effectiveness of neural mobilization and static stretching in reducing pain in rats submitted to experimental sciatica. METHODS: The rats (n=23) were divided into three groups: sham (SG/n=8), without intervention; stretching (STCG/n=8), treated with static stretching; and neural mobilization (NMG/n=7), treated with neural mobilization. The animals underwent an experimental model of sciatica by compression of the right ischiatic nerve with catgut suture thread. There were five consecutive sessions of treatment that began on the third day after lesion. The pain caused by the sciatica was evaluated by a functional incapacitation test that measured paw elevation time (PET), and values over 10s were indicative of pain. PET was measured at the following moments: before the lesion (M1), immediately before (M2) and after the first session (M3), immediately after the last session (M4) and 24h after the last session (M5). ANOVA was applied with repeated measures and unrepeated measures for intra- and inter-group comparison, respectively. RESULTS: In the SG, post-lesion PETs were greater than M1 (p<0.001), suggesting persistence of pain. In the STCG, post-lesion PETs were greater than M1 (p<0.001), but lower when comparing M3 vs. M4 (p<0.05) and M3 vs. M5 (p<0.01) suggesting the effectiveness of the treatment. In NMG, M2, M3 (p<0.001) and M4 (p<0.05) were greater in relation to M1, but not M5, showing that this treatment reestablished the normal PET values. CONCLUSION: Both forms of therapy were effective in reducing pain, with neural mobilization being the more effective of the two.
id ABRA-FT-1_7506f4c3a8fe62f61c23c50e4727a41d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-35552009000600005
network_acronym_str ABRA-FT-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
repository_id_str
spelling Neural mobilization and static stretching in an experimental sciatica model: an experimental studysciaticaphysical therapy modalitiesneuralgiaOBJECTIVE: To verify the effectiveness of neural mobilization and static stretching in reducing pain in rats submitted to experimental sciatica. METHODS: The rats (n=23) were divided into three groups: sham (SG/n=8), without intervention; stretching (STCG/n=8), treated with static stretching; and neural mobilization (NMG/n=7), treated with neural mobilization. The animals underwent an experimental model of sciatica by compression of the right ischiatic nerve with catgut suture thread. There were five consecutive sessions of treatment that began on the third day after lesion. The pain caused by the sciatica was evaluated by a functional incapacitation test that measured paw elevation time (PET), and values over 10s were indicative of pain. PET was measured at the following moments: before the lesion (M1), immediately before (M2) and after the first session (M3), immediately after the last session (M4) and 24h after the last session (M5). ANOVA was applied with repeated measures and unrepeated measures for intra- and inter-group comparison, respectively. RESULTS: In the SG, post-lesion PETs were greater than M1 (p<0.001), suggesting persistence of pain. In the STCG, post-lesion PETs were greater than M1 (p<0.001), but lower when comparing M3 vs. M4 (p<0.05) and M3 vs. M5 (p<0.01) suggesting the effectiveness of the treatment. In NMG, M2, M3 (p<0.001) and M4 (p<0.05) were greater in relation to M1, but not M5, showing that this treatment reestablished the normal PET values. CONCLUSION: Both forms of therapy were effective in reducing pain, with neural mobilization being the more effective of the two.Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia 2009-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552009000600005Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.13 n.6 2009reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapyinstname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)instacron:ABRAPG-FT10.1590/S1413-35552009005000062info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBertolini,Gladson R. F.Silva,Taciane S.Trindade,Danilo L.Ciena,Adriano P.Carvalho,Alberito R.eng2010-01-22T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-35552009000600005Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbfis/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcontato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br1809-92461413-3555opendoar:2010-01-22T00:00Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Neural mobilization and static stretching in an experimental sciatica model: an experimental study
title Neural mobilization and static stretching in an experimental sciatica model: an experimental study
spellingShingle Neural mobilization and static stretching in an experimental sciatica model: an experimental study
Bertolini,Gladson R. F.
sciatica
physical therapy modalities
neuralgia
title_short Neural mobilization and static stretching in an experimental sciatica model: an experimental study
title_full Neural mobilization and static stretching in an experimental sciatica model: an experimental study
title_fullStr Neural mobilization and static stretching in an experimental sciatica model: an experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Neural mobilization and static stretching in an experimental sciatica model: an experimental study
title_sort Neural mobilization and static stretching in an experimental sciatica model: an experimental study
author Bertolini,Gladson R. F.
author_facet Bertolini,Gladson R. F.
Silva,Taciane S.
Trindade,Danilo L.
Ciena,Adriano P.
Carvalho,Alberito R.
author_role author
author2 Silva,Taciane S.
Trindade,Danilo L.
Ciena,Adriano P.
Carvalho,Alberito R.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bertolini,Gladson R. F.
Silva,Taciane S.
Trindade,Danilo L.
Ciena,Adriano P.
Carvalho,Alberito R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv sciatica
physical therapy modalities
neuralgia
topic sciatica
physical therapy modalities
neuralgia
description OBJECTIVE: To verify the effectiveness of neural mobilization and static stretching in reducing pain in rats submitted to experimental sciatica. METHODS: The rats (n=23) were divided into three groups: sham (SG/n=8), without intervention; stretching (STCG/n=8), treated with static stretching; and neural mobilization (NMG/n=7), treated with neural mobilization. The animals underwent an experimental model of sciatica by compression of the right ischiatic nerve with catgut suture thread. There were five consecutive sessions of treatment that began on the third day after lesion. The pain caused by the sciatica was evaluated by a functional incapacitation test that measured paw elevation time (PET), and values over 10s were indicative of pain. PET was measured at the following moments: before the lesion (M1), immediately before (M2) and after the first session (M3), immediately after the last session (M4) and 24h after the last session (M5). ANOVA was applied with repeated measures and unrepeated measures for intra- and inter-group comparison, respectively. RESULTS: In the SG, post-lesion PETs were greater than M1 (p<0.001), suggesting persistence of pain. In the STCG, post-lesion PETs were greater than M1 (p<0.001), but lower when comparing M3 vs. M4 (p<0.05) and M3 vs. M5 (p<0.01) suggesting the effectiveness of the treatment. In NMG, M2, M3 (p<0.001) and M4 (p<0.05) were greater in relation to M1, but not M5, showing that this treatment reestablished the normal PET values. CONCLUSION: Both forms of therapy were effective in reducing pain, with neural mobilization being the more effective of the two.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552009000600005
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-35552009000600005
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1413-35552009005000062
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy v.13 n.6 2009
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
instname:Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)
instacron:ABRAPG-FT
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)
instacron_str ABRAPG-FT
institution ABRAPG-FT
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
collection Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy - Associação Brasileira de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Fisioterapia (ABRAPG-FT)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br||contato@rbf-bjpt.org.br
_version_ 1754575947885969408