Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological status

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrade,Bruno Fonseca Martins da Costa
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Andrade,Taísa Santos de Melo, Queiroz,Luzia Helena
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232019000100315
Resumo: Abstract This study evaluated the prophylactic measures adopted after attacks by dogs and cats in the main city of Northwester São Paulo State, based on the technical manual for post-exposure treatment, considering the not controlled (1990-1996) and controlled (1997-2010) rabies status. A retrospective analysis was done using the data from the SINAN records (W64-CID10) between 1990 and 2010. In most cases, the accidents were mild (76.9%), and biting animals were healthy (75.4%); therefore, no treatment was needed in 53.3% of the cases. In 64.6% of cases, the prescribed PEP treatment was inappropriate. The most indicated PEP treatments consisted of vaccine and RIG (43.4%), and either three doses of mouse brain vaccine or two doses of cell culture vaccine (76.5%), during the not controlled and controlled rabies periods, respectively. The treatment was more appropriate and followed the technical recommendations during controlled rabies periods compared to not controlled (p < 0.0001) periods. However, excessive application of RIG and rabies vaccine was observed in both periods.
id ABRASCO-2_4344b9591e03623455456e0f078ffa08
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1413-81232019000100315
network_acronym_str ABRASCO-2
network_name_str Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological statusRabiesAnimal aggressionPost-exposure prophylaxisImmunization scheduleDogsAbstract This study evaluated the prophylactic measures adopted after attacks by dogs and cats in the main city of Northwester São Paulo State, based on the technical manual for post-exposure treatment, considering the not controlled (1990-1996) and controlled (1997-2010) rabies status. A retrospective analysis was done using the data from the SINAN records (W64-CID10) between 1990 and 2010. In most cases, the accidents were mild (76.9%), and biting animals were healthy (75.4%); therefore, no treatment was needed in 53.3% of the cases. In 64.6% of cases, the prescribed PEP treatment was inappropriate. The most indicated PEP treatments consisted of vaccine and RIG (43.4%), and either three doses of mouse brain vaccine or two doses of cell culture vaccine (76.5%), during the not controlled and controlled rabies periods, respectively. The treatment was more appropriate and followed the technical recommendations during controlled rabies periods compared to not controlled (p < 0.0001) periods. However, excessive application of RIG and rabies vaccine was observed in both periods.ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232019000100315Ciência &amp; Saúde Coletiva v.24 n.1 2019reponame:Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)instacron:ABRASCO10.1590/1413-81232018241.32832016info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade,Bruno Fonseca Martins da CostaAndrade,Taísa Santos de MeloQueiroz,Luzia Helenaeng2019-04-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1413-81232019000100315Revistahttp://www.cienciaesaudecoletiva.com.brhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||cienciasaudecoletiva@fiocruz.br1678-45611413-8123opendoar:2019-04-05T00:00Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological status
title Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological status
spellingShingle Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological status
Andrade,Bruno Fonseca Martins da Costa
Rabies
Animal aggression
Post-exposure prophylaxis
Immunization schedule
Dogs
title_short Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological status
title_full Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological status
title_fullStr Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological status
title_full_unstemmed Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological status
title_sort Human rabies post-exposure prophylaxis relative to the disease epidemiological status
author Andrade,Bruno Fonseca Martins da Costa
author_facet Andrade,Bruno Fonseca Martins da Costa
Andrade,Taísa Santos de Melo
Queiroz,Luzia Helena
author_role author
author2 Andrade,Taísa Santos de Melo
Queiroz,Luzia Helena
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrade,Bruno Fonseca Martins da Costa
Andrade,Taísa Santos de Melo
Queiroz,Luzia Helena
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Rabies
Animal aggression
Post-exposure prophylaxis
Immunization schedule
Dogs
topic Rabies
Animal aggression
Post-exposure prophylaxis
Immunization schedule
Dogs
description Abstract This study evaluated the prophylactic measures adopted after attacks by dogs and cats in the main city of Northwester São Paulo State, based on the technical manual for post-exposure treatment, considering the not controlled (1990-1996) and controlled (1997-2010) rabies status. A retrospective analysis was done using the data from the SINAN records (W64-CID10) between 1990 and 2010. In most cases, the accidents were mild (76.9%), and biting animals were healthy (75.4%); therefore, no treatment was needed in 53.3% of the cases. In 64.6% of cases, the prescribed PEP treatment was inappropriate. The most indicated PEP treatments consisted of vaccine and RIG (43.4%), and either three doses of mouse brain vaccine or two doses of cell culture vaccine (76.5%), during the not controlled and controlled rabies periods, respectively. The treatment was more appropriate and followed the technical recommendations during controlled rabies periods compared to not controlled (p < 0.0001) periods. However, excessive application of RIG and rabies vaccine was observed in both periods.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232019000100315
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-81232019000100315
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1413-81232018241.32832016
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência &amp; Saúde Coletiva v.24 n.1 2019
reponame:Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)
instacron:ABRASCO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)
instacron_str ABRASCO
institution ABRASCO
reponame_str Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
collection Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ciência & Saúde Coletiva (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva (ABRASCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||cienciasaudecoletiva@fiocruz.br
_version_ 1754213043076595712