Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Macedo,Marina Batalini de
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Lago,César Ambrogi Ferreira do, Mendiondo,Eduardo Mario, Souza,Vladimir Caramori Borges de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RBRH (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312018000100201
Resumo: ABSTRACT Studying the performance of LID devices on a laboratory scale has the advantage of flexible layouts, so that more factors can be tested. However, they do not always correspond to what happens on a real scale of application. This paper focuses on a comparative analysis between two bioretention experimental devices considering field and laboratory scales. Based on this comparison, our understanding can be enhanced to extrapolate the results. Flow rate and duration were used as the main equivalence parameters. However, these parameters were insufficient to ensure similarity in the results. We proposed to include control volume, an application rate and an equivalent net depth as new parameters. Further research should test the variation of these parameters.
id ABRH-1_03f12332dabceee9bc62d0d383c3573d
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2318-03312018000100201
network_acronym_str ABRH-1
network_name_str RBRH (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experimentsSUDSStormwater controlWater retentionPollutant removalABSTRACT Studying the performance of LID devices on a laboratory scale has the advantage of flexible layouts, so that more factors can be tested. However, they do not always correspond to what happens on a real scale of application. This paper focuses on a comparative analysis between two bioretention experimental devices considering field and laboratory scales. Based on this comparison, our understanding can be enhanced to extrapolate the results. Flow rate and duration were used as the main equivalence parameters. However, these parameters were insufficient to ensure similarity in the results. We proposed to include control volume, an application rate and an equivalent net depth as new parameters. Further research should test the variation of these parameters.Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312018000100201RBRH v.23 2018reponame:RBRH (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)instacron:ABRH10.1590/2318-0331.0318170038info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMacedo,Marina Batalini deLago,César Ambrogi Ferreira doMendiondo,Eduardo MarioSouza,Vladimir Caramori Borges deeng2018-01-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2318-03312018000100201Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbrh/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbrh@abrh.org.br2318-03311414-381Xopendoar:2018-01-08T00:00RBRH (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments
title Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments
spellingShingle Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments
Macedo,Marina Batalini de
SUDS
Stormwater control
Water retention
Pollutant removal
title_short Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments
title_full Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments
title_fullStr Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments
title_full_unstemmed Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments
title_sort Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments
author Macedo,Marina Batalini de
author_facet Macedo,Marina Batalini de
Lago,César Ambrogi Ferreira do
Mendiondo,Eduardo Mario
Souza,Vladimir Caramori Borges de
author_role author
author2 Lago,César Ambrogi Ferreira do
Mendiondo,Eduardo Mario
Souza,Vladimir Caramori Borges de
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Macedo,Marina Batalini de
Lago,César Ambrogi Ferreira do
Mendiondo,Eduardo Mario
Souza,Vladimir Caramori Borges de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv SUDS
Stormwater control
Water retention
Pollutant removal
topic SUDS
Stormwater control
Water retention
Pollutant removal
description ABSTRACT Studying the performance of LID devices on a laboratory scale has the advantage of flexible layouts, so that more factors can be tested. However, they do not always correspond to what happens on a real scale of application. This paper focuses on a comparative analysis between two bioretention experimental devices considering field and laboratory scales. Based on this comparison, our understanding can be enhanced to extrapolate the results. Flow rate and duration were used as the main equivalence parameters. However, these parameters were insufficient to ensure similarity in the results. We proposed to include control volume, an application rate and an equivalent net depth as new parameters. Further research should test the variation of these parameters.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312018000100201
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312018000100201
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2318-0331.0318170038
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RBRH v.23 2018
reponame:RBRH (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)
instacron:ABRH
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)
instacron_str ABRH
institution ABRH
reponame_str RBRH (Online)
collection RBRH (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv RBRH (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbrh@abrh.org.br
_version_ 1754734701502791680