Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | RBRH (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312018000100201 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Studying the performance of LID devices on a laboratory scale has the advantage of flexible layouts, so that more factors can be tested. However, they do not always correspond to what happens on a real scale of application. This paper focuses on a comparative analysis between two bioretention experimental devices considering field and laboratory scales. Based on this comparison, our understanding can be enhanced to extrapolate the results. Flow rate and duration were used as the main equivalence parameters. However, these parameters were insufficient to ensure similarity in the results. We proposed to include control volume, an application rate and an equivalent net depth as new parameters. Further research should test the variation of these parameters. |
id |
ABRH-1_03f12332dabceee9bc62d0d383c3573d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2318-03312018000100201 |
network_acronym_str |
ABRH-1 |
network_name_str |
RBRH (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experimentsSUDSStormwater controlWater retentionPollutant removalABSTRACT Studying the performance of LID devices on a laboratory scale has the advantage of flexible layouts, so that more factors can be tested. However, they do not always correspond to what happens on a real scale of application. This paper focuses on a comparative analysis between two bioretention experimental devices considering field and laboratory scales. Based on this comparison, our understanding can be enhanced to extrapolate the results. Flow rate and duration were used as the main equivalence parameters. However, these parameters were insufficient to ensure similarity in the results. We proposed to include control volume, an application rate and an equivalent net depth as new parameters. Further research should test the variation of these parameters.Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312018000100201RBRH v.23 2018reponame:RBRH (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)instacron:ABRH10.1590/2318-0331.0318170038info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMacedo,Marina Batalini deLago,César Ambrogi Ferreira doMendiondo,Eduardo MarioSouza,Vladimir Caramori Borges deeng2018-01-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2318-03312018000100201Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbrh/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbrh@abrh.org.br2318-03311414-381Xopendoar:2018-01-08T00:00RBRH (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments |
title |
Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments |
spellingShingle |
Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments Macedo,Marina Batalini de SUDS Stormwater control Water retention Pollutant removal |
title_short |
Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments |
title_full |
Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments |
title_fullStr |
Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments |
title_sort |
Performance of bioretention experimental devices: contrasting laboratory and field scales through controlled experiments |
author |
Macedo,Marina Batalini de |
author_facet |
Macedo,Marina Batalini de Lago,César Ambrogi Ferreira do Mendiondo,Eduardo Mario Souza,Vladimir Caramori Borges de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lago,César Ambrogi Ferreira do Mendiondo,Eduardo Mario Souza,Vladimir Caramori Borges de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Macedo,Marina Batalini de Lago,César Ambrogi Ferreira do Mendiondo,Eduardo Mario Souza,Vladimir Caramori Borges de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
SUDS Stormwater control Water retention Pollutant removal |
topic |
SUDS Stormwater control Water retention Pollutant removal |
description |
ABSTRACT Studying the performance of LID devices on a laboratory scale has the advantage of flexible layouts, so that more factors can be tested. However, they do not always correspond to what happens on a real scale of application. This paper focuses on a comparative analysis between two bioretention experimental devices considering field and laboratory scales. Based on this comparison, our understanding can be enhanced to extrapolate the results. Flow rate and duration were used as the main equivalence parameters. However, these parameters were insufficient to ensure similarity in the results. We proposed to include control volume, an application rate and an equivalent net depth as new parameters. Further research should test the variation of these parameters. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312018000100201 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312018000100201 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2318-0331.0318170038 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
RBRH v.23 2018 reponame:RBRH (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH) instacron:ABRH |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH) |
instacron_str |
ABRH |
institution |
ABRH |
reponame_str |
RBRH (Online) |
collection |
RBRH (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
RBRH (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbrh@abrh.org.br |
_version_ |
1754734701502791680 |