Water storage variability across Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barbedo,Rafael
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Fleischmann,Ayan Santos, Siqueira,Vinícius, Brêda,João Paulo, Matte,Gabriel, Laipelt,Leonardo, Amorim,Alexandre, Araújo,Alexandre Abdalla, Fuckner,Marcus, Meller,Adalberto, Fan,Fernando Mainardi, Collischonn,Walter, Ruhoff,Anderson, Paiva,Rodrigo Cauduro Dias de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: RBRH (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312022000100235
Resumo: ABSTRACT Brazil hosts a large amount of freshwater. Knowing how this stored water is partitioned in space and time between surface and subsurface components is a crucial step towards a more correct depiction of the country’s water cycle, which has major implications for decision making related to water resources management. Here, we extracted monthly water storage (WS) variability, from 2003 to 2020, based on multiple state-of-the-art datasets representing different WS components – groundwater (GW), soil moisture (SM), surface waters (SW), and artificial reservoirs (RS) – in all Brazilian Hydrographic Regions (BHRs), and computed each component’s contribution to the total variability. Most of the variability can be attributed to SM (40-68%), followed by GW (18-40%). SW has great influence in the north-western BHRs (humid monsoon influenced) with 18-40% and the southern BHRs (subtropical system influenced) with 5-10%. RS has important contributions in the Paraná with 12.1%, São Francisco with 3.5%, and Tocantins-Araguaia with 2.1%. In terms of long-term variability, water storages have been generally decreasing in the eastern and increasing in north-western and southern BHRs, with GW and RS being the most affected, although it can also be observed in SW peaks. Comparisons made with previous studies show that the approach and datasets used can have a considerable impact in the results. Such analysis can have broad implications in identifying the nature of amplitude and phase variability across regions in order to better characterize them and to obtain better evaluations of hydrological trends under a changing environment.
id ABRH-1_3cd7ea166cd063b572c78c790fa03352
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2318-03312022000100235
network_acronym_str ABRH-1
network_name_str RBRH (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Water storage variability across BrazilWater storage partitioningBrazilian hydrographic regionsABSTRACT Brazil hosts a large amount of freshwater. Knowing how this stored water is partitioned in space and time between surface and subsurface components is a crucial step towards a more correct depiction of the country’s water cycle, which has major implications for decision making related to water resources management. Here, we extracted monthly water storage (WS) variability, from 2003 to 2020, based on multiple state-of-the-art datasets representing different WS components – groundwater (GW), soil moisture (SM), surface waters (SW), and artificial reservoirs (RS) – in all Brazilian Hydrographic Regions (BHRs), and computed each component’s contribution to the total variability. Most of the variability can be attributed to SM (40-68%), followed by GW (18-40%). SW has great influence in the north-western BHRs (humid monsoon influenced) with 18-40% and the southern BHRs (subtropical system influenced) with 5-10%. RS has important contributions in the Paraná with 12.1%, São Francisco with 3.5%, and Tocantins-Araguaia with 2.1%. In terms of long-term variability, water storages have been generally decreasing in the eastern and increasing in north-western and southern BHRs, with GW and RS being the most affected, although it can also be observed in SW peaks. Comparisons made with previous studies show that the approach and datasets used can have a considerable impact in the results. Such analysis can have broad implications in identifying the nature of amplitude and phase variability across regions in order to better characterize them and to obtain better evaluations of hydrological trends under a changing environment.Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312022000100235RBRH v.27 2022reponame:RBRH (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)instacron:ABRH10.1590/2318-0331.272220220077info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarbedo,RafaelFleischmann,Ayan SantosSiqueira,ViníciusBrêda,João PauloMatte,GabrielLaipelt,LeonardoAmorim,AlexandreAraújo,Alexandre AbdallaFuckner,MarcusMeller,AdalbertoFan,Fernando MainardiCollischonn,WalterRuhoff,AndersonPaiva,Rodrigo Cauduro Dias deeng2022-11-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2318-03312022000100235Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbrh/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbrh@abrh.org.br2318-03311414-381Xopendoar:2022-11-24T00:00RBRH (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Water storage variability across Brazil
title Water storage variability across Brazil
spellingShingle Water storage variability across Brazil
Barbedo,Rafael
Water storage partitioning
Brazilian hydrographic regions
title_short Water storage variability across Brazil
title_full Water storage variability across Brazil
title_fullStr Water storage variability across Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Water storage variability across Brazil
title_sort Water storage variability across Brazil
author Barbedo,Rafael
author_facet Barbedo,Rafael
Fleischmann,Ayan Santos
Siqueira,Vinícius
Brêda,João Paulo
Matte,Gabriel
Laipelt,Leonardo
Amorim,Alexandre
Araújo,Alexandre Abdalla
Fuckner,Marcus
Meller,Adalberto
Fan,Fernando Mainardi
Collischonn,Walter
Ruhoff,Anderson
Paiva,Rodrigo Cauduro Dias de
author_role author
author2 Fleischmann,Ayan Santos
Siqueira,Vinícius
Brêda,João Paulo
Matte,Gabriel
Laipelt,Leonardo
Amorim,Alexandre
Araújo,Alexandre Abdalla
Fuckner,Marcus
Meller,Adalberto
Fan,Fernando Mainardi
Collischonn,Walter
Ruhoff,Anderson
Paiva,Rodrigo Cauduro Dias de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barbedo,Rafael
Fleischmann,Ayan Santos
Siqueira,Vinícius
Brêda,João Paulo
Matte,Gabriel
Laipelt,Leonardo
Amorim,Alexandre
Araújo,Alexandre Abdalla
Fuckner,Marcus
Meller,Adalberto
Fan,Fernando Mainardi
Collischonn,Walter
Ruhoff,Anderson
Paiva,Rodrigo Cauduro Dias de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Water storage partitioning
Brazilian hydrographic regions
topic Water storage partitioning
Brazilian hydrographic regions
description ABSTRACT Brazil hosts a large amount of freshwater. Knowing how this stored water is partitioned in space and time between surface and subsurface components is a crucial step towards a more correct depiction of the country’s water cycle, which has major implications for decision making related to water resources management. Here, we extracted monthly water storage (WS) variability, from 2003 to 2020, based on multiple state-of-the-art datasets representing different WS components – groundwater (GW), soil moisture (SM), surface waters (SW), and artificial reservoirs (RS) – in all Brazilian Hydrographic Regions (BHRs), and computed each component’s contribution to the total variability. Most of the variability can be attributed to SM (40-68%), followed by GW (18-40%). SW has great influence in the north-western BHRs (humid monsoon influenced) with 18-40% and the southern BHRs (subtropical system influenced) with 5-10%. RS has important contributions in the Paraná with 12.1%, São Francisco with 3.5%, and Tocantins-Araguaia with 2.1%. In terms of long-term variability, water storages have been generally decreasing in the eastern and increasing in north-western and southern BHRs, with GW and RS being the most affected, although it can also be observed in SW peaks. Comparisons made with previous studies show that the approach and datasets used can have a considerable impact in the results. Such analysis can have broad implications in identifying the nature of amplitude and phase variability across regions in order to better characterize them and to obtain better evaluations of hydrological trends under a changing environment.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312022000100235
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2318-03312022000100235
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2318-0331.272220220077
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv RBRH v.27 2022
reponame:RBRH (Online)
instname:Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)
instacron:ABRH
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)
instacron_str ABRH
institution ABRH
reponame_str RBRH (Online)
collection RBRH (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv RBRH (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbrh@abrh.org.br
_version_ 1754734702361575424