Advanced ankylosing spondylitis: a multisite, multimodality densitometric analysis for investigation of bone loss in the axial and appendicular skeleton

• Autor(a) principal: Theodorou,Stavroula
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: Theodorou,Daphne, Kakitsubata,Yousuke, Gelalis,Ioannis, Tsifetaki,Niki
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
• Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021001201627
• topic: Ankylosing spondylitis; Bone mineral density; Osteoporosis; CT X ray; Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate if there is a bias in bone mineral density measurements among major densitometric techniques across multiple skeletal sites. METHODS: In 25 advanced ankylosing spondylitis patients, bone mineral density measurements were acquired in the lumbar spine, the hip, and the forearm. RESULTS: In total, 60% of patients had a bone mineral density Z-score of -2 or less at one or more skeletal sites. Dedicated loss of cortical bone was identified at the distal forearm (60% of patients). Differences in bone mineral density measurements across all densitometric techniques were highly significant (p≤0.001). Bone loss was more striking in spinal trabecular bone by three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography [Z-score -2.1] versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [Z-score 0]. A trabecular bone loss quantified by quantitative computed tomography was about twice as much as a cortical bone loss by single-energy X-ray absorptiometry (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Low bone mineral density is prevalent in advanced ankylosing spondylitis patients, predominating in the spine. Bone mineral density measurements have systematic differences when compared to each other. Knowledge of these offsets is useful for improved diagnosis of regional bone loss that allows for targeted treatment of osteoporosis. Three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography is more suitable for evaluating spinal osteoporosis in advanced ankylosing spondylitis than dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, which rather underestimates bone loss.