Current status of Brazilian interprofessional education: a national survey comparing physical therapy and medical schools
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302019001001241 |
Resumo: | SUMMARY OBJECTIVES To investigate how many Brazilian medical and physical therapy schools have initiatives and courses related to IPE in their curricula, assessing the barriers and factors associated with their implementation and comparing the differences between both programs. METHODS This nationwide survey was carried out in 2017 and included representatives of all physical therapy and medical schools in Brasil. Offers of interprofessional activities and related opinions and barriers were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 76 (33.9%) of the medical and 159 (41.4%) of the physical therapy schools answered the questionnaires. At least 68.4% of the medical schools and 79.2% of the physical therapy schools have IPE initiatives, although the number of mandatory courses and clerkships is still low. Despite recognizing IPE’s importance in health education, school representatives see the lack of integration of programs, conflicting schedules, and the lack of institutional support as barriers. In physical therapy, there is a smaller perception of barriers and greater incorporation of mandatory programs in the curriculum. CONCLUSION These results will help in the development of future interventions that can enhance IPE in curricula in developing countries. |
id |
AMB-1_303ec01289f0830e2cbe56ae093d405c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0104-42302019001001241 |
network_acronym_str |
AMB-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Current status of Brazilian interprofessional education: a national survey comparing physical therapy and medical schoolsInterprofessional educationMedical studentsPhysical therapy specialtySUMMARY OBJECTIVES To investigate how many Brazilian medical and physical therapy schools have initiatives and courses related to IPE in their curricula, assessing the barriers and factors associated with their implementation and comparing the differences between both programs. METHODS This nationwide survey was carried out in 2017 and included representatives of all physical therapy and medical schools in Brasil. Offers of interprofessional activities and related opinions and barriers were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 76 (33.9%) of the medical and 159 (41.4%) of the physical therapy schools answered the questionnaires. At least 68.4% of the medical schools and 79.2% of the physical therapy schools have IPE initiatives, although the number of mandatory courses and clerkships is still low. Despite recognizing IPE’s importance in health education, school representatives see the lack of integration of programs, conflicting schedules, and the lack of institutional support as barriers. In physical therapy, there is a smaller perception of barriers and greater incorporation of mandatory programs in the curriculum. CONCLUSION These results will help in the development of future interventions that can enhance IPE in curricula in developing countries.Associação Médica Brasileira2019-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302019001001241Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.65 n.10 2019reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.65.10.1241info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCorrea,Cyntia Pace SchmitzHermuche,Lina SantanaLucchetti,Alessandra Lamas GraneroEzequiel,Oscarina da SilvaLucchetti,Giancarloeng2019-11-05T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302019001001241Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2019-11-05T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Current status of Brazilian interprofessional education: a national survey comparing physical therapy and medical schools |
title |
Current status of Brazilian interprofessional education: a national survey comparing physical therapy and medical schools |
spellingShingle |
Current status of Brazilian interprofessional education: a national survey comparing physical therapy and medical schools Correa,Cyntia Pace Schmitz Interprofessional education Medical students Physical therapy specialty |
title_short |
Current status of Brazilian interprofessional education: a national survey comparing physical therapy and medical schools |
title_full |
Current status of Brazilian interprofessional education: a national survey comparing physical therapy and medical schools |
title_fullStr |
Current status of Brazilian interprofessional education: a national survey comparing physical therapy and medical schools |
title_full_unstemmed |
Current status of Brazilian interprofessional education: a national survey comparing physical therapy and medical schools |
title_sort |
Current status of Brazilian interprofessional education: a national survey comparing physical therapy and medical schools |
author |
Correa,Cyntia Pace Schmitz |
author_facet |
Correa,Cyntia Pace Schmitz Hermuche,Lina Santana Lucchetti,Alessandra Lamas Granero Ezequiel,Oscarina da Silva Lucchetti,Giancarlo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Hermuche,Lina Santana Lucchetti,Alessandra Lamas Granero Ezequiel,Oscarina da Silva Lucchetti,Giancarlo |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Correa,Cyntia Pace Schmitz Hermuche,Lina Santana Lucchetti,Alessandra Lamas Granero Ezequiel,Oscarina da Silva Lucchetti,Giancarlo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Interprofessional education Medical students Physical therapy specialty |
topic |
Interprofessional education Medical students Physical therapy specialty |
description |
SUMMARY OBJECTIVES To investigate how many Brazilian medical and physical therapy schools have initiatives and courses related to IPE in their curricula, assessing the barriers and factors associated with their implementation and comparing the differences between both programs. METHODS This nationwide survey was carried out in 2017 and included representatives of all physical therapy and medical schools in Brasil. Offers of interprofessional activities and related opinions and barriers were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 76 (33.9%) of the medical and 159 (41.4%) of the physical therapy schools answered the questionnaires. At least 68.4% of the medical schools and 79.2% of the physical therapy schools have IPE initiatives, although the number of mandatory courses and clerkships is still low. Despite recognizing IPE’s importance in health education, school representatives see the lack of integration of programs, conflicting schedules, and the lack of institutional support as barriers. In physical therapy, there is a smaller perception of barriers and greater incorporation of mandatory programs in the curriculum. CONCLUSION These results will help in the development of future interventions that can enhance IPE in curricula in developing countries. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302019001001241 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302019001001241 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1806-9282.65.10.1241 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Médica Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.65 n.10 2019 reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) instacron:AMB |
instname_str |
Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) |
instacron_str |
AMB |
institution |
AMB |
reponame_str |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ramb@amb.org.br |
_version_ |
1754212834328182784 |