Teamwork: relevance and interdependence of interprofessional education
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Saúde Pública |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102017000100232 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Determine the perception of university students regarding interprofessional and interdependent work between team members in their inclusion in primary care. METHODS Analytical cross-sectional study. The sampling had a probabilistic, stratified random type with 95% confidence and 5% margin of error. Seven-hundred and four students of Public Universities in Santiago (Chile) answered self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS Ninety-seven point eight of students say that interprofessional work is important; 27.1% of them declare that their university did not seem to show that their study plans were important. The professionals listed as most important in teams are physicians and nurses. CONCLUSIONS Spaces for development and institutional support are key elements to promote interprofessional work. If this competence can involve each academic unit in their different formative spaces there will be a significant contribution to said promotion. Teamwork is a pending task. |
id |
USP-23_bf859e44622f1f1e45baa63edca05239 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-89102017000100232 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-23 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Teamwork: relevance and interdependence of interprofessional educationStudents, Health OccupationsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSocial PerceptionPatient Care TeamInterdisciplinary CommunicationInterprofessional RelationsABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Determine the perception of university students regarding interprofessional and interdependent work between team members in their inclusion in primary care. METHODS Analytical cross-sectional study. The sampling had a probabilistic, stratified random type with 95% confidence and 5% margin of error. Seven-hundred and four students of Public Universities in Santiago (Chile) answered self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS Ninety-seven point eight of students say that interprofessional work is important; 27.1% of them declare that their university did not seem to show that their study plans were important. The professionals listed as most important in teams are physicians and nurses. CONCLUSIONS Spaces for development and institutional support are key elements to promote interprofessional work. If this competence can involve each academic unit in their different formative spaces there will be a significant contribution to said promotion. Teamwork is a pending task.Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102017000100232Revista de Saúde Pública v.51 2017reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USP10.1590/s1518-8787.2017051006816info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTamayo,MBesoaín-Saldaña,AAguirre,MLeiva,Jeng2017-04-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-89102017000100232Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0034-8910&lng=pt&nrm=isoONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2017-04-20T00:00Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Teamwork: relevance and interdependence of interprofessional education |
title |
Teamwork: relevance and interdependence of interprofessional education |
spellingShingle |
Teamwork: relevance and interdependence of interprofessional education Tamayo,M Students, Health Occupations Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Social Perception Patient Care Team Interdisciplinary Communication Interprofessional Relations |
title_short |
Teamwork: relevance and interdependence of interprofessional education |
title_full |
Teamwork: relevance and interdependence of interprofessional education |
title_fullStr |
Teamwork: relevance and interdependence of interprofessional education |
title_full_unstemmed |
Teamwork: relevance and interdependence of interprofessional education |
title_sort |
Teamwork: relevance and interdependence of interprofessional education |
author |
Tamayo,M |
author_facet |
Tamayo,M Besoaín-Saldaña,A Aguirre,M Leiva,J |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Besoaín-Saldaña,A Aguirre,M Leiva,J |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tamayo,M Besoaín-Saldaña,A Aguirre,M Leiva,J |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Students, Health Occupations Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Social Perception Patient Care Team Interdisciplinary Communication Interprofessional Relations |
topic |
Students, Health Occupations Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Social Perception Patient Care Team Interdisciplinary Communication Interprofessional Relations |
description |
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Determine the perception of university students regarding interprofessional and interdependent work between team members in their inclusion in primary care. METHODS Analytical cross-sectional study. The sampling had a probabilistic, stratified random type with 95% confidence and 5% margin of error. Seven-hundred and four students of Public Universities in Santiago (Chile) answered self-administered questionnaire. RESULTS Ninety-seven point eight of students say that interprofessional work is important; 27.1% of them declare that their university did not seem to show that their study plans were important. The professionals listed as most important in teams are physicians and nurses. CONCLUSIONS Spaces for development and institutional support are key elements to promote interprofessional work. If this competence can involve each academic unit in their different formative spaces there will be a significant contribution to said promotion. Teamwork is a pending task. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102017000100232 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102017000100232 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1518-8787.2017051006816 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública v.51 2017 reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
collection |
Revista de Saúde Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br |
_version_ |
1748936503843618816 |