Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cabar,Fábio Roberto
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Binotti,Gabriela Aparecida Marson
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021001001338
Resumo: SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the opinion of freshmen and fifth-year students of the University of Sao Paulo School of Law in relation to the respect for maternal autonomy and knowledge of the existence and the need to protect the unborn child. METHODS: Information was obtained from a questionnaire; responses were compared with appropriate statistical methods. RESULTS: In total, 403 students answered the questionnaire, 75.2% being first-year students; 58.6% of the students were against State intervention in maternal autonomy, with no difference between groups. However, 55.1% of students were in favor of the defense of the welfare of the unborn, with the statistical difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among the first-year students, there is a contradiction about respect for maternal autonomy. Among the fifth-year students, most of them were unreservedly in favor of respect for maternal autonomy.
id AMB-1_6bc860c3373f5e86c988c8dcf1b77cd0
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-42302021001001338
network_acronym_str AMB-1
network_name_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussionPersonal autonomyFetusBioethicsJurisprudenceSUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the opinion of freshmen and fifth-year students of the University of Sao Paulo School of Law in relation to the respect for maternal autonomy and knowledge of the existence and the need to protect the unborn child. METHODS: Information was obtained from a questionnaire; responses were compared with appropriate statistical methods. RESULTS: In total, 403 students answered the questionnaire, 75.2% being first-year students; 58.6% of the students were against State intervention in maternal autonomy, with no difference between groups. However, 55.1% of students were in favor of the defense of the welfare of the unborn, with the statistical difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among the first-year students, there is a contradiction about respect for maternal autonomy. Among the fifth-year students, most of them were unreservedly in favor of respect for maternal autonomy.Associação Médica Brasileira2021-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021001001338Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.67 n.9 2021reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)instacron:AMB10.1590/1806-9282.20210700info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCabar,Fábio RobertoBinotti,Gabriela Aparecida Marsoneng2021-11-17T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-42302021001001338Revistahttps://ramb.amb.org.br/ultimas-edicoes/#https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||ramb@amb.org.br1806-92820104-4230opendoar:2021-11-17T00:00Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion
title Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion
spellingShingle Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion
Cabar,Fábio Roberto
Personal autonomy
Fetus
Bioethics
Jurisprudence
title_short Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion
title_full Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion
title_fullStr Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion
title_full_unstemmed Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion
title_sort Maternal autonomy and the rights of the unborn child: a necessary discussion
author Cabar,Fábio Roberto
author_facet Cabar,Fábio Roberto
Binotti,Gabriela Aparecida Marson
author_role author
author2 Binotti,Gabriela Aparecida Marson
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cabar,Fábio Roberto
Binotti,Gabriela Aparecida Marson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Personal autonomy
Fetus
Bioethics
Jurisprudence
topic Personal autonomy
Fetus
Bioethics
Jurisprudence
description SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the opinion of freshmen and fifth-year students of the University of Sao Paulo School of Law in relation to the respect for maternal autonomy and knowledge of the existence and the need to protect the unborn child. METHODS: Information was obtained from a questionnaire; responses were compared with appropriate statistical methods. RESULTS: In total, 403 students answered the questionnaire, 75.2% being first-year students; 58.6% of the students were against State intervention in maternal autonomy, with no difference between groups. However, 55.1% of students were in favor of the defense of the welfare of the unborn, with the statistical difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among the first-year students, there is a contradiction about respect for maternal autonomy. Among the fifth-year students, most of them were unreservedly in favor of respect for maternal autonomy.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021001001338
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-42302021001001338
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1806-9282.20210700
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Médica Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v.67 n.9 2021
reponame:Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
instname:Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron:AMB
instname_str Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
instacron_str AMB
institution AMB
reponame_str Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (Online) - Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ramb@amb.org.br
_version_ 1754212836826939392